« first day (716 days earlier)      last day (2817 days later) » 

07:50
0
Q: Is It right conditional sentences OR I should use mixed structures?

Maxsecond conditional 1) If I were more attentive I would get a better mark now (first part- yesterday; second- current time) third conditional 2) If I had been more attentive I would have had a better mark yesterday (first part- yesterday; second- yesterday) mixed e.g. 3) If I had b...

Anonymous
08:06
@Man_From_India Hi :-) I'm not ignoring your messages but this has been a very busy week! I'm popping in several times each day to check flags and messages but I haven't been able to do much more. Sorry about that!
08:23
user image
4
08:36
@snailplane oh no no. I didn't think that you are ignoring :-) I understand! Happy Sunday :-)
0
Q: Why are two 'to be' verbs together (was + to be)

MaxDon't understand what this structure about (IF THAT WAS TO BE) If that was to be the basis for denying a right that was the norm elsewhere, then substantive evidence of non-performance should be made available If that was to be the case then the question was a simple one: who would be responsib...

Anonymous
Someone please stat Cowper's image :)
Anonymous
Erf. Star, not stat.
On mobile :-)
I don't think they dress it this way any more. Is it their ethnic wear?
09:16
@snailplane Thank you! Good afternoon! (0:
Anonymous
Good morning! I'm running a sleep deficit and unfortunately need to sleep now
Anonymous
Have a good day :-)
11:47
> 1. The train came after a two-hour delay.
> 2. The train came after a two hours' delay.
> 3. The train came after two hours' delay.
Which would you choose between 2 and 3?
12:50
:37869237 Handled it
 
1 hour later…
13:59
@Færd number 2
SBM
SBM
good evening people
14:39
Good morning.
14:52
@userr2684291, Have you just woken up? Hi!
@V.V. Haha, no. It's 16:56 here.
@V.V. Yeah, "a two hours' delay" is okay.
15:08
@Færd #1 and #3 work. #2 doesn't.
@Lawrence Are you a native speaker of English?
Sure, he is.
Dunno why my American friend would say otherwise, then, regarding 2, that is.
"Delay " can be countable and uncountable. Here it should be countable.
@V.V. I don't think that's what matters at all.
15:17
Yes, L is right.
@userr2684291 I'm not sure why either. As @V.V. suggests, delay in #3 is not countable. I'm not sure whether that's a test that holds in general since "a" isn't really thought of as counting (one) delays, but until you've internalised the idiomatic phrasings, it sounds like a useful test to try.
We have possessive case, so "a" can't be used.
(Or at least that the counting part doesn't feature that strongly.)
@Lawrence I'm not saying it can't be uncountable, I'm asking why you wouldn't say 2.
He can't explain, but he feels.
15:20
@userr2684291 The simplistic answer is that it doesn't sound right.
@V.V. :)
@V.V. That doesn't always work. Consider the idiom "a dog's breakfast".
I should read about possessive.
Ugh, I need to find new friends, lol.
I found it.
Try this: delay can be treated as a verb or noun. In "two hours' delay", delay is a verb. In "two-hour delay", it's a noun.
I think it's because you can't say "a two hours".
15:26
Swan. A day"s journey, twenty minutes' delay. Yay!
@userr2684291 I think "a" is applied to "delay" as the head word.
@Lawrence Then there's no reason why 2 wouldn't be okay.
A three-hour journey, a twenty -minute delay.
@V.V. In "a day's journey", the 'grouping' is (a day's) journey - that is, the journey of a (one) day. In "a 2h delay", the grouping is a (2h delay).
@userr2684291 You don't use "a" with verbs.
@Lawrence Would you say "after a two days' time"?
15:31
When you say, for example, "he went for a run", the word run is treated as a noun. If you say "he ran", ran is treated as a verb.
Bad example.
Let me think...
@userr2684291 Taken as a clause, no.
"After two days' time" would be ok, but "after two days" sounds better.
@Lawrence "After a two years' period" or "after a year's period", or both?
@userr2684291 Both are a little awkward, though "a year's period" is more acceptable.
I think it's acceptable because I'd read "a" as applying to "year", rather than "period".
Yeah, a applies to two years.
15:38
@userr2684291 But you don't normally say *"a two years".
On the other hand, "a year" is fine.
I'm aware of that.
That's why the original 2 is wrong.
I asked my friend again and he repeated my question, but he wrote, essentially, "a two-year delay", not the genitive variant.
@userr2684291 So your friend now rejects #2.
Indeed.
Interestingly, "after an hour's delay" works, for the same reason - that "an" applies to "hour", not "delay".
Yeah.
I hate myself for not just saying that at the beginning because we even talked about this here (two times that I count) – instead I googled it, found some semi-legit results, decided to ask my friend, etc.
15:44
But with " period " it's different, it's countable.
No, that's got nothing to do with it. I just gave that example in lieu of time because you wouldn't be able to say a two years' time even if a two years were possible.
SBM
SBM
good night folks
@userr2684291 It's fine. Language doesn't always follow the obvious rules, even if you know something is idiomatic or unidiomatic. Chasing it down to something plausible and rational can be fun. Then again, sometimes it's the obvious rules that are the hardest to identify. :)
@SBM Bye!
@V.V. can you plz give the entry no. And title? I too like to learn about it :-)
@V.V. Wait, actually, that's one way to make uncountable nouns countable.
15:47
You know how they do it? A period of four days
Or again a four-day period
@V.V. This is one of the few times that I've come to this chat room and @DamkerngT. isn't here.
Admittedly, I haven't been around here much lately.
@Lawrence You'd say an hour's delay and an hour's time?
@userr2684291 Those would be fine.
L, he disappeared.
Makes sense, thanks.
15:50
@userr2684291 E.g.: the train suffered an hour's delay; the meeting will still have to start in an hour's time.
@V.V. You mean he's not here anymore? How long has he been away?
@userr2684291 You're welcome. :)
Half a month perhaps.
@Lawrence Last seen May 13 at 15:54
@V.V. I just had a look at his profile: ell.stackexchange.com/users/3281/damkerng-t.
Did something happen here?
15:53
No, I don't think so.
Glad to hear it. :)
Time for me to go. Nice chatting with you!
@Lawrence Laters.
Thanks, L.
@Færd, now you can read all this information from a native speaker. I was wrong.
@Man_From_India, what should I tell you?
@V.V. The entry number in Swan's book.
Where you found the explanation of "delay" question.
16:08
440.4. third edition.
2
And Longman Exams Dictionary "delay " countable and uncountable.
Dictionary. Cambridge. Org. (online) period (examples )
@V.V. thank you. Will look into it later.
My pleasure.
 
2 hours later…
18:39
Hello Everyone!!!
what does squirrel the juices mean youtu.be/JZVWkjFGCBI?t=33s
 
2 hours later…
20:15
22
Q: Indefinite articles used with plural nouns: It was AN amazing TWO DAYS

Araucaria ManThe indefinite article a(n), derives from the old English word an meaning "one". Generally this word only occurs in determiner function before noun phrases which are singular. However, there seem to be some cases where this determiner occurs before plural noun phrases. I say that, but actually th...

@Lawrence Thanks for the input. I hold your native impression precious, esp because I'd expected to hear the reverse from a native speaker, and now I know that perhaps a clear consensus does not exist. But I'm not convinced by your argument. I'm probably going to go with 1 or 3 for now.
20:38
@V.V. Thanks, but maybe refrain from dispensing definite answers unless you refer to an authority or present the argument backing your answer, or at least you have a native speaker's prerogative. :)

« first day (716 days earlier)      last day (2817 days later) »