« first day (612 days earlier)      last day (2923 days later) » 

00:03
Hello! :-)
 
3 hours later…
03:17
Good morning
wow a beautiful sunrise
the glass facades are orange in the rising sun
04:17
Good morning everyone!
What "psydoscience" is called in hindi language? What does psydoscience really mean?
04:38
0
Q: In(to) a road/path or On(to) a road/path?

Vun-Hugh VawOn the topic of giving directions, I'm not sure whether I should suggest someone to "turn into the right lane / the driveway / Long Road" or "turn onto the right lane / the driveway / Long Road". The answers to this question seem to suggest that as you drive on the surfaces of roads, you should b...

05:55
:35547002pseudo-science
noun [ C usually singular ] UK ​ /ˈsjuː.dəʊ.saɪ.əns/ US ​ /ˈsuː.doʊ.saɪ.əns/

a system of thought or a theory that is not formed in a scientific way
@yubraj
 
2 hours later…
08:11
Hey LO
How's it vibrating?
@yubraj morning
@yubraj don't you mean "pseudoscience"?
08:25
@snailplane o/
08:37
@M.A.R. yes
@snilplne nods....
@yubraj pseudoscience is stuff people think is scientific but is actually not.
Ummm...
But hat would you call to blind folded reading?
I'll call it blindfolded reading
If they believe the cause is the person being holy or something stupid like that, it can be superstition
Although I think there's a better word for religious superstition but I don't recall it now
08:48
I'm wondered with this telents
@yubraj hmm, that will either become a hot network question or it's off-topic
Oh....
@yubraj humans naturally love to explore the unknown
Some People call it third eye activation!
I don't have any idea about it
There's always some explanation, but before we're certain how it's done, all the stuff floating around is bullshit
@yubraj that's the best thing you can do about it: Not have any ideas
You don't have the means to do research about it
And whatever opinion you choose to believe will definitely be wrong for the simple reason that it's not scientific
09:11
Nods...
But, science must justify such phenomena with evidence. Whether it's cheating or technique or magic or god gifted power, science should explain it.
Science doesn't even believe in God. How would it explain god gifted power? Loh....
@yubraj science should, but it can't yet.
We have a very limited knowledge of all the stuff that goes on in the world
And we only have come to that realization currently
Nods....
Is it DOP ?
Dermo optical perception?
I have no idea what that is
And as I said, I prefer not to take any opinions
09:19
Ufff....
Because opinions aren't facts
But once you're sure it's a fact, you can safely believe it
Yes that's it.
Answer to my question in the website is yet to be received.
@yubraj that's a small beta site. You should wait a day or two.
@M.A.R. Weird!
Good afternoon, everyone!
@DamkerngT. Wired!
@DamkerngT. o/
09:27
@M.A.R. :)
You're creepy without your nose. Too much . . . me
GAAAAAAA
\o/
I wonder if your version of \o/ is something like \o-/
09:31
Nah, just \o/ as everyone else's.
Wow, then your nose gets out of the screen or something
I never knew how 3D this emoticon actually was
If you wore VR goggles, you could perhaps see my nose. :P
Damn 3D world with your un-2D ways
 
2 hours later…
11:06
careful in next time
is this a correct sentence?
I don't think I can come <- I just said this sentence when i was talking with a friend. It sounds not correct for me. Is it wrong?
11:36
@JudeNiroshan "Be careful next time"
Without in
I catch myself singing the last Ukrainian song I learned.
I must try to translate it.
Thanks :)
No problem!
12:19
Roadside Picnic by Brothers Strugatsky is being made into a TV series in the US
Roadside Picnic (Russian: Пикник на обочине, Piknik na obochine, IPA: [pʲɪkˈnʲik nɐ ɐˈbotɕɪnʲe]) is a short science fiction novel written by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky in 1971. By 1998, 38 editions of the novel were published in 20 countries. The novel was first translated to English by Antonina W. Bouis. The preface to the first American edition of the novel (MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York, 1977) was written by Theodore Sturgeon. The film Stalker, directed by Andrei Tarkovsky, is loosely based on the novel, with a screenplay written by the Strugatsky brothers. == Book title == Roadside...
 
1 hour later…
13:38
0
Q: The Amazing Migration of an English terminology question to Russian Language Stack Exchange

CopperKettleI've just discovered that my question asking about an English term that an English biotechnitian would use was migrated to, of all possible SEs, the Russian Language SE. This is just to register my amazement at this decision. I've very little free time right now. Let me cite a comment left by...

 
2 hours later…
15:46
Good Monday Evening!
GME!
GMM to Snails
GMLE to Damkerng
GMEE to V.V.
Word of the Day: inexpiable
@CowperKettle But that's not a question about biology at all.
It's about the meaning of a word in English.
On receiving the mark-sheet from the University (1)/I realized (2)/ that I had got only passing marks in English. (3)/ No error
Migrating it to Russian.SE was a good guess.
Could anyone help me please
Anonymous
Word of the day: folkways
3
Anonymous
16:00
@user62015 Is it "no error"?
It says passing mark
Instead of passing marks
Anonymous
Erm. That would sound strange to me, at any rate...
I think they'd also include an article.
Let me tell you the explain from the website
Anonymous
I was about to ask.
16:02
Ans:(3) Mark = a number of letter that is given to show standard of somebody’s work or performance.
Hence, that I had got only passing/pass mark …….. should be used here.
Or other website says “pass marks” should be used not “passing marks”.
Anonymous
I don't speak a dialect where "pass marks" is used, and I'm not sure about that one. To me, "passing marks" sounds fine.
Thanks.
Anonymous
It sounds quite odd to me with just "mark" with no article.
But it shows marks of only one subject so
mark is enough instead of marks
Anonymous
Yeah, I guess you could say that, but then why no article?
16:06
Could that possibly be an Indian English thing?
Yes. It seems
Anonymous
I'm not familiar with mark as a non-count noun.
Yeah, I don't think you need articles in Indian English.
Anonymous
Interesting.
I agree with both of you.
Anonymous
16:08
Well, I speak American English, but I'm also somewhat familiar with British English. Actually, we tend to say grades rather than marks in AmE.
Anonymous
I do have a couple books that talk about InE, but I haven't run into non-count mark before. I would love to see it in a corpus :-)
Anonymous
I would also be interested to see what a BrE speaker would say about the question, since it's clearly not written in my dialect.
pass mark?
Yeah, "got" reveals that, I think.
Thank.
Thanks.
16:12
@user62015 I don't know what you're asking.
I needed help in finding error in the question.
16:43
@user62015 I know; I meant with the question "pass mark?".
Answer says it should be pass mark instead of passing marks
So it makes sense?
Note what it says after the transcriptions.
Yes.
So what would you choose at the end?
16:49
@user62015 What would you choose?
Greetings!
D'you find "pass mark" more correct than "passing mark"?
Maybe in India
@user62015 Did you read what it says after the transcriptions?
Let me check
the number of points that must be achieved in order to be successful in an exam
You mean to say this?
16:51
No, before that.
uk us passing grade, passing mark
What do you get from that?
What can you educe?
I think passing mark and pass mark both are fine.
But it depends on countries most of the time.
That's right.
Thanks.
16:55
It says "pass mark" is used in the UK; whereas "passing grade" and "passing mark" in the US.
Yes.
And in India we prefer UK English
17:10
@user62015 Yeah. In essence, BrE was appropriated and underlay InE.
17:49
Is it fine to ask here how to rephrase a sentence? I am working on my thesis, and as English is not my primary language my wording feels off. "In 1915 Godfrey Harold Hardy, in a famous paper published in the Proceedings
of the London Mathematical Society, answered in the affirmative a question of
Landau [7]. "
@N3buchadnezzar Is this question really that well-known?
@userr2684291 I guess this sentence, was taking a bit out of context. Sory
"In 1915 Godfrey Harold Hardy, in a famous paper published in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, answered in the affirmative a question of Landau [7]. In this paper, not only did Hardy generalize Hadamard’s three-circle theorem, but he also put in place the first brick of a new branch of mathematics
which bears his name: the theory of Hardy spaces $H^p$. "
@N3buchadnezzar I'd say "In a famous 1915 paper published in the P. of the L. M. S., Harold Hardy answered the question posed by Landau by proving that..."
OK, lemme think.
I feel that I put too much information into a single sentence. Or that the sentence tries to have two main points, which is confusing for the reader.
Yeah, I think even though the introduction is a bit long-winded, I'd continue the sentence the way I started it. (I'm not a native speaker of English, mind.)
Can't you make it obvious that the answer is "yes" in the follow-up sentence?
If you choose to do so, finish the preceding one with "...answered Landau's question."
18:06
Maybe remove the bit of Landau makes it clearer. As it is not really important for the structure
An alternative would be "confirmed Landau's doubts" or "confirmed/proved their theory", or some such.
"Answered in the affirmative" sounds like legal bs.
I totally agree.
At any rate, in mathematics and such, a single "yes" isn't enough – you need to prove it, so I'd give it up if it's nonessential.
Cheers.
Thanks =)
18:23
!!greet/N3buch
Welcome to ELL's chat room @N3buch! Happy chatting!
Waves furiously back
@N3buchadnezzar Your sentence is fine with me.
Why? Because I've seen much worse, often enough.
(In papers, I mean.)
Writing words is hard. You have to place them in order and stuff
f
18:38
The sentence is a bit complicated, but it seems to mean what the author wanted to say.
Just came to say "hi".
Say it then
@DamkerngT. Mathematicians often does that. Overcomplicating things, to make themself seem smarter then they are :p
18:49
@N3buchadnezzar Isn't that true for everyone in their field
Grammarians often do that. Barge into a chat discussion to correct a grammar error, to make themselves seem smarter than they are. :p
Everyone sometimes needs to show off
@CowperKettle You're brutal today
@N3buchadnezzar I can assure you that it's not only mathematicians. :P
I mean if you spent a year writing a paper, why not?
You have to spend that time doing something :p
And I can assure you chemists are the coolest people of the bunch
18:50
LOL
Linguists are usually either really cool or really annoying/annoyed
"In 1915 Godfrey Harold Hardy, in a famous paper published in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, confirmed a question posed by Landau \cite{Hardy}. In this paper, not only did Hardy generalize Hadamard’s three-circle theorem, but he also put in place the first brick of a new branch of mathematics
which bears his name: the theory of Hardy spaces $H^p$. For three decades afterwards mathematicians such as \citeauthor{inequalities}, \citeauthor{Riesz}, Privalov, F. and V. Smirnov, and G. Szegö, expanded and developed the theory of the Hardy spaces. While most of this early work
^I think that will be my draft for the introduction. Thanks for all the help! Will let it lie for a few days, before I attempt improving it again =)
Anonymous
Snailbarge.
Anonymous
Word of the day: barge
3
Robosmile! (^_^)
18:56
@M.A.R. Just tired
> Budging the sluggard ripples of the Somme,
A barge round old Cerisy slowly slewed.
Softly her engines down the current screwed,
And chuckled softly with contented hum
Good night
Sleep tight!
Anonymous
By the way, we don't have electricity here right now. I'm typing this on my phone and can't easily star messages. I owe you all a bunch of stars :-)
Anonymous
Rest well, Kettle o' Cowper!
Oh!
Is it because of the flood?
Anonymous
Good question!
18:58
Flood?
Anonymous
There does appear to be quite a lot of water about. I hope the snails outside are doing okay.
19:30
I hope they managed to climb (crawl?) up the trees in time.
@DamkerngT. fly
Haha!
If you can catch them flying on camera, it could be an instant hit!
They fly too fast to be caught on camera
Anonymous
20:01
Some of them climb up trees. They'll climb anything they can find, though.
Anonymous
We have some tree snails here too, but most of the snails live in the dirt.
20:14
@snailplane They prolly purchased some scuba diving equipment and rolled with it
Heh.
I got mine with my tablet. Now I can play Temple Run 26 3D while I'm in my bathtub, submerged beneath the suds.
@snailplane So that's where all the pranksters have been getting those wonderful ideas.
It's just a social experiment, bro.
 
1 hour later…
21:50
Word of the Day: sprezzatura
Why are there more than one word of the day per day?
Word of the Day: spatula
@N3buchadnezzar Because! :-)
@N3buchadnezzar That nice cooking thing!
Anonymous
22:43
We aren't too strict about taking "of the day" literally.
Anonymous
What matters is that we want to share a word we just learned, or a word we thought would be interesting :-)
Anonymous
We could be a bit silly about it and say "Word of the last fifteen minutes" ;-)
Why is it a Hilbert type? I thought the rule was based on sound?
Scratches vocabulary

« first day (612 days earlier)      last day (2923 days later) »