« first day (589 days earlier)      last day (2947 days later) » 

Anonymous
Hello!
What's the difference between "look" and "see"?
Example: Look me
And see me
Anonymous
You can't say *look me. It has to be look at me.
In spanish those are "mirar"; "Mirame" (Look me)
at?
Anonymous
In terms of meaning, the basic difference between look and see is that look is volitional.
Anonymous
02:07
That is also the difference between listen and hear.
Anonymous
Grammatically, look is usually intransitive, so it needs a preposition: look at
Anonymous
You look at things on purpose. You see things without trying.
Anonymous
You listen to things on purpose. You hear things without trying.
Interesting, thanks @snailplane
 
2 hours later…
04:37
@SinNombreSinApellido There's a related question on ELL that might help:
17
Q: What is the difference between "look", "see", and "watch"?

bytebusterWhen should I use "look", "see", and "watch"? I'm watching "Star Trek". Have you seen "Star Trek"? Are the examples above correct?

 
1 hour later…
05:42
27
Q: Hanging a hammer from a table and a stick so that its midpoint is outside of the support of the table

Tanishq JaiswalI came across this pic on the internet today. At beginning I thought it is just not possible because the centre of mass is way off so gravity will generate torque making the stick and hammer fall. Later I thought that the heaviest part of hammer could've balanced the centre of mass and so it co...

06:10
The FBD in the second-most-voted answer is more correct, but I guess the one in the most-voted answer is easier to understand.
This stuff always looks cool!
Word of the day: FBD
06:27
LOL
 
2 hours later…
08:13
@DamkerngT. Fragile Bonding Distribution?
08:29
Moderating ELL and ELU is tiring.
You have to argue with a lot of incorrect decisions.
I wonder if it's also the case for other language sites.
There's a reason I'm scared of clicking ''review'' on ELL.
08:53
> Make America Great Britain Again!
09:38
Hello!
Hello
I have send an E-mail to a company , so can I start it with hello
because hello seems to be informal
Usually you start letters with ''dear''
ok, thanks
 
2 hours later…
11:31
Once again, Shog proves he's awesome.
11:59
@M.A.R. Free (Angry) Birds Day, maybe. :P
12:20
> For the first time in what anyone can remember the door of the castle was open and unguarded.
Pullum K says this one is ungrammatical. He gave a brief reason behind its ungrammaticality.
The complement of the in-PP should denote a time interval in sentences like this. The fused relative clause - what anyone can remember - doesn't express a time interval.
Now I want to know if generally fused relative clause doesn't express time interval. Or is it just the case only here?
@snailplane @DamkerngT. @Araucaria
I thought fused relative clause should express a time interval, not embedded interrogative clause. Anyway can anyone give some explanation regarding this?
12:45
Mouse pancreatic islets, grown in rats & transplanted into diabetic mice, function for prolonged periods of time… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/824482115416948737
The future of stem cell research may be here in the form of a hybrid human-pig embryo. http://bit.ly/1UDISvB via @Mic
These two news just WOW
Hm.
@M.A.R. What's the baby waiting for? Haha.
They see me slither, they wither.
13:40
@Man_From_India I wonder where Pullum discussed this, but IMO the sentence is quite contrived.
@DamkerngT. over email conversation :-)
"contrived" is still okay but he went as far as saying it "ungrammatical".
Let's see. If we try to side with the sentence, what would be a good word for this gap: Anyone can remember that in ___
It also has two gaps in one. Let's see if two gaps work in other sentences ...
> I met her in the garden.
@Man_From_India "News" is an uncountable noun.
> In what I met her.
Doesn't quite work, I think.
(If it works, it's not in the way Pullum's example seems to be intended to mean.)
13:58
The gap to be filled by time, no doubt as Snail had mentioned earlier. But still doesn't feel okay.
Hmm... but we already have time before in.
I don't think it'll work if we try to read it that way.
Well it can still be fine but I can't understand that "time interval" explanation.
> For the first time in what anyone can remember the door of the castle was open and unguarded.
> Anyone can remember the door of the castle was open and unguarded for the first time in what.
???
Well this might make sense.
> For the first time in (the time) [anyone can remember __], the door of the castle was open.
It seems like you try to put two gaps into one.
> They remember what in what.
> In what they remember, what.
14:03
@DamkerngT. no no :O
> For the first time anyone can remember, the door of the castle was open.
I think there is one gap in there.
Say, anyone can remember A, B, C and D. A,B,C and D are time frame. Now the door was open for the first time in A, B ,C and D.
Maybe two, but not in the same place.
They remember A-D or remember in A-D?
@DamkerngT. right. Better phrasing.
From A to D
I think that's what Pullum K meant by time interval.
So, A-D is what they remember, not in what they remember, right?
14:06
@DamkerngT. right
If you try to read it that way, "For the first time in what [...]" wouldn't work.
@DamkerngT. i think it is making sense.
Anything can make some sense, whether it's grammatical or not.
Well I think this is why Pullum K said the time interval is not expressed by that fused relative clause.
Probably. I don't know the context, though. Maybe he had his reason to give that sentence as an example.
14:11
@DamkerngT. I asked about that sentence. And he said no more than what I wrote earlier.
 
1 hour later…
15:18
Just learned the word : INNOCUOUS.
2
Example: I'm an innocuous Indian :-)
15:59
Hello @Catija
How are you doing? How is baby?
Doing great :D
Yay 👍
 
1 hour later…
17:26
@user2684291 nice catch. Thanks. I should've written two news stories.
 
2 hours later…
19:54
@ColleenV I edited and I understand, thanks for the help.
@WillowRex No problem - it takes a while to get the hang of SE sites and get a feel for what the community likes
Comments are pretty loosey-goosey but we have some folks that like to see answers be more like, um, an entry in a reference book and less like a forum post to help one other person.
@ColleenV I tend to be more on the chatty side, so I'll try to be less so.
@WillowRex It's fine to be chatty - just keep it in the comments :)
or in here
There's nothing wrong with using your own voice in your answers either - just avoid asking questions or responding to questions in your answer
and don't use greetings or signatures (the folks browsing on mobile really hate "fluff" (: )
20:31
@ColleenV Ah, the good ol' smiley-before-parenthesis issue
Well I was going to do it the other way and I had some vague memory of someone complaining about the :)
so I changed it up - it will take some getting used to. I don't know how to do :P in reverse hrm
d: ?
@ColleenV It looks like a guy with a cap
Yeah, oh well I should stick to vanilla :)
@ColleenV It was probably me making a lame joke about a guy having two mouths
@ColleenV My eyes.
I also don't know how to deal with this problem.
20:43
@user2684291 Browsing SE on mobile?
Or the fluff problem?
The smiley.
However, this abomination "(blah blah :)" is never a solution.
GAAAAAAA
Now I won't be able to sleep tonight
Double-mouth is the sanest solution.
I don't know about that either.
You could do some use-smiley distinction voodoo, like emboldening the smiley
It looks like "his/her" in text.
20:49
Not as bad as ''his\her''
@M.A.R. I also never use :) or :(, which is another issue, I suppose.
Anonymous
My smileys have noses.
Anonymous
:-)
@M.A.R. I think eschewing smileys in these situations is the way to go.
Anonymous
@user2684291 Yabbut, writing :-) ) seems so weird.
21:05
@snailplane The only version I would okay is "(blah blah :))".
Anonymous
@user2684291 There's no consensus about it. For some people the smiley absorbs the parenthesis, and for others it doesn't.
Anonymous
Someday there may be a consensus, who knows? :-)
I hope so.
@snailplane Some of mine are enschnozened as well, e.g., (^:. I've always perceived this smiley as sassy.
Anonymous
Love that word :-)
23:13
Hai! Can you please tell me whether we have to use the word "unnecessary pressure" with an article or without an article?
@Nagendra It depends on the context.
@user2684291 Can you please explain?
@Nagendra What exactly? Absent context, it can be used with an article or anarthrously.
Give us the full sentence.
23:37
@user2684291 I have no context. I want to know when to use an article and when to omit it. Could you explain to me with your own examples?

« first day (589 days earlier)      last day (2947 days later) »