« first day (550 days earlier)      last day (2986 days later) » 
03:00 - 19:0019:00 - 21:00

03:09
I always buy books for my niece and nephew each year for Christmas and this one is really fun and English related so I thought y'all might be interested: The Weird World of Words It's basically English trivia.
For example, Did you know that ‘Almost’ is the longest word in the English language with all of its letters in alphabetical order? Or that ‘Stewardesses’ is the longest word you can type solely with your left hand?
Anonymous
03:36
@ColleenV What about billowy? :-)
Anonymous
Or is it cheating to use a word which has two of the same letter?
Anonymous
I did perl -ne 'chomp; $s = join "", sort split (//, $_); printf "%-3d $s\n", length $s if $s eq $_' ~/coca/words /usr/share/dict/words | grep -v ' [A-Z]' | sort -n | uniq
Anonymous
And it came up with billowy as the sole 7-letter candidate.
Anonymous
For 6 letters, it came up with abbess, abhors, accent, accept, access, accost, adders, almost, begins, bellow, billow, biopsy, cellos, chills, chilly, chimps, chinos, chintz, chippy, choosy, choppy, efflux, effort, floors, floppy, gloppy, glossy, and knotty.
Anonymous
If we get rid of words that reuse letters, it's down to almost, begins, biopsy, chimps, chinos, and chintz.
04:23
good morn
minus thirty outside (0:
04:33
Greetings. How farest thou?
@snailplane I think for trivia purposes, double letters might not count. I like your script though :)
I hadn't gotten around to testing the veracity of the claims (I've already wrapped the book) but it's a fun conversation starter I think :)
@CowperKettle Yikes. It's only 0 here and I'm all bundled up lol
I can handle 38 C like a champ though ;)
04:49
@Mick Fine, thank you!
(0:
1
Q: a passing police man vs a policeman passing

Kenichiro YokozawaPlease tell me the difference in nuance between the following two senteces. It was lucky for her that a passing policeman heard her cries for help and was able to rescue her from the canal. It was lucky for her that a policeman passing heard her cries for help and was able to rescue her from ...

"a passing policeman" - an adjective or a present participle phrase?
"a very passing policeman" - wrong. Probably a pp phrase then
Have you ever eaten chips (fries) cooked in beef dripping? They are wonderful. It must be 55 years. sigh
!!wiki/dripping
Dripping, also known usually as beef dripping or, more rarely, as pork dripping, is an animal fat produced from the fatty or otherwise unusable parts of cow or pig carcasses. It is similar to lard, tallow and schmaltz. == History == It is used for cooking, especially in British cuisine, significantly so in the Midlands and Northern England, though towards the end of the 20th century dripping fell out of favour due to it being regarded as less healthy than vegetable oils such as olive or sunflower. Traditionally fish and chips were fried in beef dripping, and while this practice does continue in...
No, never. I've had a millet porridge.
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Not all adjectives are gradable. If very works, we can tell that it's an adjective, but if very doesn't work, that alone doesn't prove that it's not an adjective.
@snailplane so "a passing policeman" has an adjective after all?
and "a policeman passing" is a case of postpositive adjective?
Anonymous
04:55
No, it's a verb form, but your test was insufficient to demonstrate that on its own. I would avoid the abbreviation "pp" for "present participle", by the way, as it's ambiguous.
Anonymous
I use PP exclusively for "preposition phrase".
Anonymous
Which is a common convention among linguists.
Anonymous
> He was awake.
Anonymous
> He was very awake. ← Hmm, is awake gradable?
04:57
> It was lucky for her that a policeman passing heard her cries for help and was able to rescue her from the canal. (a postpositive present participle probably works well only if it is long)
Anonymous
I guess we tend to say wide awake.
Anonymous
And we do say half-awake.
Anonymous
@CowperKettle I like passing by in this example.
@snailplane also a pres. part. phrase?
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Yes. Or as CGEL would say, a gerund-participial clause. An -ing clause.
04:59
yes (0:
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Noun phrases can have several kinds of post-head modifiers. One type of post-head modifier is the AdjP (adjective phrase); when AdjPs appear in this function, they are often referred to as "postpositive". But the term isn't much used for other types of post-head modifiers.
Anonymous
Also, not everything that appears in post-head position is a modifier. There are also, for example, post-head complements.
Complements are usually post-head
Anonymous
05:16
In CGEL's analysis, the subject is a kind of complement.
05:42
@snailplane I've read in a book that 'to be' is often allowed in the sense of "have" in passive voice sentences of the verbs fall, rise, come, arrive, go, lose. Is it right?
And it provided some examples. 1. Mighty Ceaser is(has) fallen 2. Summer is(has) come 3.The book is(has been) lost. 4.The sun is(has )risen 5.Golden days are(have) gone.
Good morning
Anonymous
@Nagendra No, that is not correct. That is not passive; it is the archaic be-perfect.
Anonymous
In Present-Day English, the be-perfect is no longer a productive part of the language. There are some remnants which are still used, like gone, but these have been reanalyzed as predicate adjectives and are no longer be-perfects.
Anonymous
It was used productively until 150 years ago or so. It took a very long time to die out. You will still see it in older written English, in purposefully archaic English, in religious materials, and so on.
Anonymous
But what you said is almost correct, it's just that your description of it was somewhat inaccurate.
Anonymous
05:53
It is a real construction, just not a passive.
@snailplane it's not my description. I've exactly copied what is given in the book. I too thought that it's not passive. Thanks!
Anonymous
It superficially resembles the passive, so it's sometimes mistakenly described as one.
Anonymous
But it lacks the semantic and grammatical characteristics of the passive. There is no corresponding active clause, no by-phrase indicating the agent, no swapping of semantic roles.
Anonymous
What happened is this: in older forms of English, there were two perfect auxiliaries, be and have.
Anonymous
Have was always more common, but be was used as a perfect auxiliary with certain kinds of verbs.
Anonymous
06:04
This isn't entirely accurate, but the basic distinction was have for unergative and transitive perfects, and be for unaccusative perfects.
Anonymous
It took a very long time for English to completely lose the be-perfect. It lasted into the Modern English period, until the 1800s.
Anonymous
The last verbs to survive with be-perfects were come and go.
Anonymous
The actual difference between the have- and be-perfects is a little more complicated than just unergative versus unaccusative, but I can't give a complete account off the top of my head. It could make a good question for English Language & Usage.
Anonymous
Or Linguistics.SE. You can find a be-perfect in German, Danish, Italian, and other languages today.
Anonymous
The line is drawn in different places in different languages at different times.
Anonymous
06:09
It's probably most instructive to compare to German.
Anonymous
For a discussion in English, see e.g. be/have + past participle: the choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English (Kytö 1997), The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English (Rydén et al 1987), The perfect auxiliaries in the language of Shakespeare (Kakietek 1976), Structural change in the English auxiliary system: on the replacement of be by have (Zimmermann 1973)
Anonymous
The loss of the English be-perfect has been a very popular topic among linguists.
06:30
Thanks for your elaborate explanation. I'll try to ask it on ELU.
07:04
3
Q: a passing police man vs a policeman passing

Kenichiro YokozawaPlease tell me the difference in nuance between the following two senteces. It was lucky for her that a passing policeman heard her cries for help and was able to rescue her from the canal. It was lucky for her that a policeman passing heard her cries for help and was able to rescue her from ...

It looks like Jasper keeps on adding the obituaries tag to this question. O_O
Which is misguiding, methinks
Anonymous
07:06
Do obituaries have distinctive grammatical features?
@snailplane I've no idea
> The first airport terminals were built for transportation purposes only and lacked any architectural significance. (Do I need the there, in the beginning?)
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Yes. First makes it definite.
Thank you, the Blackhat Snail!
Anonymous
Out of the set of all airport terminals, we are picking out the first. First is not always definite, however . . .
Because I thought that maybe "first terminals" could be read as "well, roughly the terminals that were built in the 1920s"
And this "roughly" may permit the omission of the
Anonymous
07:21
Nope :-)
okay (0:
Anonymous
We aren't precisely specifying the exact set we're talking about, but that's not a requirement for definiteness.
> The article explores the history of airport terminal complexes. The first airport terminals were built for transportation purposes only and lacked any architectural significance. As time went by, the "architect's perception" of the terminal changed, reflecting the intertwined technological and social changes.
I'm trying to help out a friend, translating a bit for free.
It is blatantly clear that the policeman mentioned in the OP is alive and well, the progressive form is used, hence the tag obituaries is wholly inappropriate. But have it your way. — Mari-Lou A 54 secs ago
07:47
> This article explores the history of airport terminal complexes. The first airport terminals were built for transportation purposes only and lacked any outward architectural significance. As time went by, the "architect's perception" of the terminal changed, reflecting the intertwined technological and social changes. That is why, when we study the historical trends, we can identify the key time points, provide descriptions and uncover causal relationships.
> This study identifies the key stages in the development of international airport terminal design in Russia and foreign countries. By taking a close look at the sequence of events and trends in the field, it is possible to detect certain patterns that arose in the early stages of its history and to come up with recommendations to guide further development.
The art of writing a paragraph where a couple of words would have sufficed.
07:58
@CowperKettle An art indeed. A true master may be able to write 200-300 pages when one word would suffice.
They're a Writing Jedi! :P
BTW, nice boombox!
good afternoon all (or whatever time it happens to be where you are) o/
Good afternoon!
@Catija nods -- Absolute vs. scale could be the key. (BTW, I should've written "I've never been happier -- not being as happy excludes now", to be more accurate.) cc @snailplane
@snailplane You aren't happier now than you are now. -- I suppose we could say that, but that would make English curious in another way! :-)
I think I've never know [something] vs. I've never been happier is probably like the continuative perfect vs. the experiential perfect.
It's often that in experiential perfect, the time of the state/event excludes now.
08:15
2
Q: McCoy, decoy, and coy

Mari-Lou AA “McCoy” means something that is truly genuine. The idiomatic expression, “the real McCoy” is used when the speaker wants to emphasize the purity the authenticity of something. It is said to derive from the Scottish McKay (or MacKay) whisky, whenever a host offers his guest a drop of the real Mc...

08:55
> All of these examples seem to be the distributed reading, in which each of a number of individuals has a unique head. In contrast, Shakespeare used "their head" only once, in Romeo and Juliet, where the Prince says to Montague:

Seale vp the mouth of outrage for a while,
Till we can cleare these ambiguities,
And know their spring, their head, their true descent,
And then will I be generall of your woes,
And lead you euen to death?

And in this case, there is indeed just one head for all the ambiguities.
"And in this case, there is indeed just one head for all the ambiguities." -- I say, this sentence is also ambiguous, and it was deliberately!
(In case my ellipsis after the introductory-it didn't work, you can read it as 'and it was done deliberately'.)
Nice song!
BTW, here is an updated chart of Arctic Sea Ice Area:
09:22
Let's have a look at another curious corner in English:
4
Q: They write in their school diary (or) diaries?

Mari-Lou ACurrently, I am using a children's English coursebook called Gold Experience A2, by Pearson, it's for a private student of mine. It's supposed to help young learners prepare for the KEY exam, and it covers the basics. In chapter 02 there is a short report entitled Tech-free Teens—is it possible?...

> a1) Each morning they write about their thoughts and feelings in their school diary.
> a2) Each morning they write about their thoughts and feelings in their school diaries.
I suppose a2) is preferable. (It's my choice, too.)
1
Q: a sense or senses

Larry LiangI have been facing a difficulty understanding the usage between singular or plural forms in situations like this: I give them a book. I give them books. If my understanding is right, the first sentence means I give a group of people just ONE book, while the second means I give a group of peopl...

> b1) The activity helps them develop a keener sense of body awareness.
> b2) The activity helps them develop keener senses of body awareness.
Now, why b1) is preferable? (And it's my choice as well!)
09:46
Hello... Oh, my EL&U avatar is showing up instead. How come? Anyway, slightly off topic request here. Does anyone know if Peter got a Winter Bash hat after I awarded him the bounty? It doesn't look like it, does it? FYI I didn't win one either. Sorry for butting in like this.
@Mick I've had roast potatoes cooked in goose fat two years ago, if that's relevant to the conversation. They were very yummy too.
@Mari-LouA No idea about the hat. I've got only one hat, and it's an easy one at that! BTW, just want to say hello. Hello!
Hello!
I guess our avatars in chat is based on our main sites in our profiles.
I was sure winning and awarding bounties would have earned hats. I think this year they're much harder to win. Oh, well...
(or should it be 'based on our main site in our profile'? lol :-)
09:53
@DamkerngT. that would explain why the avatar is different. Makes sense.
Yes, I got your meaning
Well, it's very quiet here. Our American friends are still asleep I think. @DamkerngT. thanks for welcoming me here on chat. You are a gent (I presume you're a man...right?)
I just mentioned the choice between singular and plural when we use a noun in its distributive meaning, so right now my eyes are so keen at these choices. :D
@Mari-LouA Exactly!
!!greet/Mari-LouA
Welcome to ELL's chat room @Mari-LouA! Happy chatting!
See, I'm a man and a bot. :D
 
3 hours later…
12:29
"You can crash at our place ". Funny.
12:45
!!!
Hello.
@ColleenV Wow!
@ColleenV I see you changed your avatar back.
@Arrowfar Yes, to something that can wear a hat :)
Ahh nice!
Here's another picture of a crash:
Heh!
That's a cutesie crash. :-)
13:21
Next time she might say, No, I won't. — TRomano 2 hours ago
xD
14:12
@Damkerng T: Repeating the article, "... a card or an old piece of paper" subtly reinforces the idea that one will have to search through a variety of old scraps when looking for something that was scribbled down. — TRomano 18 mins ago
I suppose he's right, but are we reading the sentence too close?
> " ... Six months later you find a name and e-mail address on a card or an old piece of paper."
Hmm...
> X For what [reason] did you put that there?
For what reason did you put that there? is actually okay to me.
14:53
> Zinc is essential for growth and development. At the cellular level, it is critically involved in proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.
Why do we say "At eye level" but "At the cellular level"?
I suppose eye level is a special case, while the cellular level is a typical case.
Ah, I think I understand. Thank you!
Hi damk and cowper.
Good evening!
15:09
Good evening!
Cool. All three of us have evening at the moment :)
15:23
Wow this is crazy and funny. Trolling at its best. Look at the 'best answer' here, it has 215 upvotes:
Im reading about zinc metabolism. Quite interesting.
Chemistry?
> In developing countries, remarkable results can be expected: zinc supplementation
might reduce child death globally by 63%. Zinc
deficiency is one of the ten most important factors
contributing to the burden of disease in developing
countries with high mortality
@Arrowfar Yes, biochemistry, but the article is not deep into chemistry.
So do you always have to do research while translating or proofreading?
I was glancing through neuroscience news and found that a memory receptor needs zinc to function. From there, I found that zinc affects mood and cognition. Etc.
@Arrowfar I'm just reading for myself, out of curiosity.
15:26
oh nice!
> Zinc requirements and the risks and benefits of zinc supplementation
But zinc overdose is dangerous too. It has a narrow dosage window.
I finished translating a big job and decided to take some rest. Hence, reading random stuff.
Good.
I should print out more Shakespeare sonnets. I've run out of my current batch. All memorized. (0:
Does anybody have a book reader? Which model is good to buy, I wonder.
I mean the hardware thingy you use to read books.
My local shop has 14 models
I have nooo idea. Snail might know.
Like a kindle?
I think damk has kindle if I remember correctly right @DamkerngT. ?
I would like to buy the cheapest one, a Digma model. (0:
15:34
@Arrowfar Yes. It doesn't work now, though, and shipping it back to repair is probably not reasonable.
Another local shop has 142 models
I still have another non-LED eBook reader, but it's not a Kindle.
I remember that I looked into this a few months ago.
I think I saw this one:
@DamkerngT. Tesla?
Is it good?
But I can't remember now. I remember there are two brands selling exactly the same hardware, one with Google Play, and the other without.
15:37
The shop says is has a highlight system for the screen
checking...
@CowperKettle nods -- Does it say it comes with the standard Google Play store?
People seem to like this model
@DamkerngT. I haven't checked
Why is Google Store important?
@CowperKettle Hmm... I don't know about that one.
@CowperKettle Ah, it might just be more important to me, because I've invested too much in Kindle books, so I need a legit Kindle app on my reader.
(If I want to buy a new one)
Ah, I see!
I see: E-Ink Carta is better than E-Ink Pearl
So a Digma model might be good
Less than a hundred bucks
nods -- Some people may complain that it's too white. My old Kindle is Pearl. I'd say I'd want to use a whiter one. :D
15:47
I'm not picky!
In this video, E-Carta is in the middle
Looks even less white
Btw, I still use the very old nokia's black and white cellphone. There is no internet etc. in it though of course.
@CowperKettle Indeed! Strange!
I have an ancient (2006) cellphone too, but its battery is poor
@DamkerngT. It's a little awkward for casual conversation, by my lights.
@CowperKettle Yay. So I am not alone!
15:56
I still think my old Nokia N95 has a better audio system than recent devices.
@user2684291 your ping didn't reach anyone. Btw hello.
@user2684291 Agreed. The context I was thinking wasn't a casual one anyway.
It was in the same setting we'd say To whom am I speaking? :-)
Oops! Sorry for the extra to.
Better restart my browser; it's not very responsive at the moment. See you guys in a jiffy.
@Arrowfar Hi. How are you going?
Yes I am fine thanks. How are you?
It's still not very responsive, but at least I can type without lagging so far behind.
(And then he continued the heavyweight, monstrous background process...)
16:06
@Arrowfar Pretty good.
@user2684291 I'm not sure, but is this your first time in this room? It looks like you've met Arrowfar, but I don't know about that.
I'm not sure, I think I've been here before. And no, I don't know who @Arrowfar is.
I see. Anyway, welcome to the room! (^_^)
Hey, I just got a secret hat! What did I do?!!
Ah, this secret hat seems to be quite common!
Thanks.
I'm not sure how I got mine either.
It's not much of a hat though, but it's better than nothing, I reckon.
:D
I haven't checked the leader board yet. Hopefully, ELL'll do better than last year.
16:19
Yes true, I don't know who user2684291 is either, just random strangers on the internet meeting and greeting :0)
Hmm... 150 hats. Not too bad, I suppose.
Scratch that. We're in the top most 25%. 150 hats is pretty good!
16:33
:>
16:55
0
Q: "Fell onto" x "Fell on" What's the difference?

Davyd DinizWhat's the difference between these two sentences? Are they correct? The water drop fell onto my head The water drop fell on my head Could anyone explain me difference between these terms?

Would the sentence "The water drop fell onto my head" sound normal to a native speaker of English?
> "John fell on the roof", however, means that John was already on the roof in a standing or walking position, fell, and is now lying down.
Would "John fell on the roof" always imply that he had been there before falling?
Anonymous
@CowperKettle It sounds okay.
Anonymous
@CowperKettle I think it could go either way.
Thank you!
hi @snailplane
I just recalled the song "Raindrops are falling on my head", and thought it would be strange to remodel it to onto
Anonymous
17:01
Hello
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Hmm, I do like it better with on. I wonder if that has to do with meaning or rhythm.
Anonymous
Maybe both :-)
I like "on" better.
Anonymous
I think onto is possible, though.
Anonymous
17:03
I'm looking at Google Books results.
Anonymous
> Droplets of water fell onto my head, neck, shoulders. I tipped my head back, and they fell on my face.
Anonymous
> A breeze shook the wet leaves. Raindrops fell onto my head. The smell of the sewer faded. I flicked the cigarette into the gutter and heard the jogger's sharp breath and her sneakers striking the wet street. I wished her a good night.
Prepositions can be tricky. I make mistakes in using them sometimes.
@snailplane This "onto" sounds a bit vernacular to me
Anonymous
I don't get that impression.
17:05
Hmm, I'd say, "John fell on the roof" is ambiguous. It might mean that while he was on the roof, he fell. Or it might mean that he was somewhere else, in a helicopter hovering over the building perhaps, and he fell and landed on the roof. — Jay 2 mins ago
Anonymous
But I do think on is probably the usual choice, and onto is probably not particularly common.
Anonymous
@CowperKettle Yep.
Anonymous
That's what I meant when I said it could go either way.
Anonymous
So I suppose for raindrops, I'd recommend on.
Anonymous
Without actually going so far as saying there's something wrong with onto.
17:07
nods
Ontology is a tough subject
Why is on more common? I'll blame it on this song:
@DamkerngT. The same that I mentioned
It's from some ancient musical, shot in the previous millenium
@snailplane snail do you think my English has a good flow? I mean from the chat writing or do I have to improve it more? just out of curiosity.
Anonymous
17:09
You're fine.
I see, thanks.
Hello all !
Hello Hanaa!
17:22
My heart fell onto the floor when I saw the news @CowperKettle
and did you pick your heart back from the floor Hanaa?
@CowperKettle The drops keep falling on his head! Why? Isn't it natural?
(j/k)
@Arrowfar I did. :)
Good :)
17:37
I liked the new picture @Mick :)
@Hanaa It's an old avatar (Spongebob Squarepants). I'm just using it for the Winter Bash.
17:58
@Mick The winter bash?
@Mick The winter bash?
yes it is "winter bash" right now. The season of fake internet hats ;-)
@Mick The winter bash?
Go to the main site and click on the snowflake, you will notice it.
@Hanaa You need to get busy on the main site. You won't earn any hats here.
18:02
Yes you can I think. By starring ten messages in chat, I don't know if that hat is available now or not.
It gets crazy in chats when people are looking for that hat.
Anonymous
I think they're trying to make it so the hats this year don't encourage disruptive behaviors.
@Arrowfar I did wonder why chat was so busy.
@Mick wow!
I have switched off hats though.
@Arrowfar You humbug!
18:05
@Mick Heh. Naah people are here for just quality English discussions now :-)
@Mick Hah I might seem like a humbug but I did have 6.9k points a year ago, so I did contribute to sites here. Mostly giving answers. :)
Great@Arrowfar!
@Hanaa Oh Hanaa you are here and you are there. I don't know where to chat with you now :)
Both places are beneficial
Yeah.
Well Google hangouts are fun but here you can discuss English related things I believe.
Yes when I chat with you, I may use phrases which could be unnatural
I come to confirm here or in the ELL
18:20
@Hanaa There on hangouts you type way too fast by the way. Here you make one message, disappear then make another message, disappear :) just joking by the way.
Laters.
I remove the message when I make mistakes.
Dish of the day ...
!!wiki/minestrone
Minestrone (/ˌmɪnᵻsˈtroʊni/; Italian: [mineˈstroːne]) is a thick soup of Italian origin made with vegetables, often with the addition of pasta or rice. Common ingredients include beans, onions, celery, carrots, stock, and tomatoes. There is no set recipe for minestrone, since it is usually made out of whatever vegetables are in season. It can be vegetarian, contain meat, or contain a meat-based broth (such as chicken stock). Angelo Pellegrini, however, argued that the base of minestrone is bean broth, and that borlotti beans (also called Roman beans) "are the beans to use for genuine minestrone...
IIRC, pronunciations match spellings more closely in Italian.
Healthy :)
Anonymous
Anonymous
@Ellbot I would not syllabify minestrone that way in English. By the maximum onset principle, the /s/ belongs with the third syllable.
18:41
@snailplane Oh, yummy!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Your minestrone picture made me think of chāshū-men! :-)
A-ha! The description of minestrone made me think of another dish. Let's see if Ellbot can retrieve it.
!!wiki/จับฉ่าย
Aww... no page for it!
Anonymous
I went to Google Images because I don't think there's a Wikipedia page for チャーシューメン.
Anonymous
18:44
@DamkerngT. Do you eat meat? I forgot.
@snailplane Maybe there is! It's quite popular!
@snailplane Yes, but not very often.
Anonymous
I don't always remember which cultures eat which meats. And of course individual people in different cultures have different beliefs and customs . . .
Anonymous
Here in the U.S., most people eat most meats, but we have some vegetarians and vegans. Not very many, though. Most people who say they're vegetarian actually eat meat sometimes.
A lot of Chinese people don't eat beef.
I think most Thais eat almost everything. :-)
Anonymous
In some countries people eat dog or horse or cat or whale, but those are all taboo here.
18:51
Only a few people in some regions over here eat cats sometimes, but that's quite unusual.
What does a cat taste like damk?
I've never tried that!
Anonymous
I was going to say people in the U.S. eat all sorts of meats, but I realized while I was typing it that it's not true – that people in other countries eat meats we don't.
Anonymous
We just don't even think of them as meat normally because they're taboo and we don't think about them.
Anonymous
18:53
In the same way, I'm sure, that we eat meat in the U.S. that people in some other countries wouldn't even consider eating.
Here beer and wine is taboo.
I mean alcohol heh.
Anonymous
I don't consume alcohol, but it's very widespread in the U.S.
Right, India and cows comes to mind.
Anonymous
@user2684291 Oh, great example! :-)
Should it be "Here beer and wine is taboo." or "Here beer and wine are taboos."?
18:54
@Arrowfar BTW, there's a song for this: youtube.com/watch?v=ZKufFIF-bpU (lit. bachelors eating cats)
Anonymous
@Arrowfar Either can work technically, but I prefer are. But don't change the form of taboo as though it's a noun; use it as an adjective.
@DamkerngT. Heh listening now :D
@snailplane nods
@Arrowfar The melody is sort of traditional, a bit like Korean trot songs.
Anonymous
Subject–verb agreement with coordinate subjects in English is very complicated.
@DamkerngT. Yeah. Are those guys in the video Thai?
Anonymous
18:56
It tends to depend on how the coordination is conceptualized. Is the pair a single unit, or are you considering them individually?
Anonymous
> [Peanut butter and jelly] is my favorite flavor of sandwich.
@Arrowfar Yes, 100% Thai, I'm sure. :-)
Anonymous
> [Peanut butter and jelly] are two flavors I like very much.
Anonymous
In the former, I'm considering peanut butter and jelly to be a single unit.
Anonymous
In some sentences, this isn't possible:
Anonymous
18:57
> [Peanut butter and jelly] are very different from one another.
Anonymous
Is would be ungrammatical.
I see, thanks.
@DamkerngT. Nice tune. I subscribed to the channel btw just to try new songs once a while.
03:00 - 19:0019:00 - 21:00

« first day (550 days earlier)      last day (2986 days later) »