« first day (494 days earlier)      last day (3035 days later) » 

00:00
@snailplane It's what @yubrajsharma mentioned a few minutes ago.
Anonymous
As in, cell internet rather than wi-fi.
Anonymous
Oh, I missed it!
SIM provides survice to access internet through mobile data
Anonymous
@yubrajsharma You're free to use your own style in chat, but I'd like to caution you: some users may feel a bit overwhelmed when they see lots of exclamation points. They might think you're shouting at them.
Anonymous
It's usually better to use only one exclamation point (or period, etc).
Anonymous
00:01
And we usually don't put spaces before them.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Nope, 's here is is :-)
@snailplane I realized that after typing that message. :-)
It's the only way that would make some sense of that line.
00:40
Again ......use of 'would have to'--I would have to write more articles to make use of England words and phrases.
Implied conditional---I would have to agree his failure ! (If he failed in the future)
@DamkerngT. What do you think ?
 
1 hour later…
01:51
Sawasdee khrap
@yubrajsharma It sounds odd out of context.
But it may be okay in a right context.
@CowperKettle Sawasdee khrap!
It's getting curiouser and curiouser in Westworld!
 
2 hours later…
04:14
I wonder whether a kathoey uses "khrap" or "kha" in Thailand as a suffix
Females use kha
Sawasdee kha! Minus five.
(0Ж
Minus 1 here
Going for a bicycle ride now
Fine.
Planning to go shopping
Good luck! (0:
You take care.
05:05
@DamkerngT. I think we need to make a context ....to make use of "would have to" practically
 
1 hour later…
06:14
Billiken. Interesting.
06:41
@V.V. Hi
07:05
@user62015 hello.
Hi
Could you help me?
The criminal was
B. caught, convicted the hung
C. in a short period of time.
D. No error.
I think, convicted the hung*
is wrong
but Answer says within a short period of time.
"In" refers to a future period, but we have "was"
See?
But could you please explain "the hung"?
Let's consult the dictionary.
No, I don't know such usage. Usually convicted of a crime.
Found guilty
I will try another one.
No such usage, is your source reliable?
2
Q: 'Convicted the Hung' - Right?

VijayCan we say he was convicted the hung? Is it grammatically right or just an informal sentence? I've seen sentences like 'Sentenced to hang'. But i don't have any idea about this.

Someone did the same test.
07:35
Hi
 
2 hours later…
09:10
Hello why it is taking time to reply this mail ?
is that sentence correct ?
If wrong why ?
 
2 hours later…
10:49
@Shriram What mail are you talking about? What sentence are you talking about?
 
1 hour later…
12:14
@V.V. Brrr!
@CowperKettle Hmm... mostly, ha. :-)
Anonymous
@user62015 Yes, you're right – the is wrong. It must be a misprint. They probably meant to write and instead of the.
Can you tell who is and who's not "krathoey"? (^_^) @CowperKettle
@snailplane I guess it's from the same source as the one of our old question. :-)
0
Q: Neither of ---their books or his book

learner Neither of the twin brothers took their books. Neither of the twin brothers took his book. Which is most suitable?

> I'm assuming that you mean neither brother took his own book. In this case, his book is the correct usage. Their books is idiomatic and should be avoided.
We should avoid idiomatic alternatives!? o_O
:D
Note to self: find out more about 'distributive possession'
7
A: The ambiguous "he is buried"

Colin FineThere is no ambiguity. In a present-tense narrative, it could be passive "He marries, he dies, he is buried" but in any other context, it is adjectival. He is buried is a copular sentence, where "buried", an adjective, is the complement of the copula "is". You can call it a participial ad...

Another nice answer!
> There is no ambiguity. In a present-tense narrative, it could be passive "He marries, he dies, he is buried" but in any other context, it is adjectival.
Yay, for the mentioning of 'present-tense narrative'!
> He is buried
is a copular sentence, where "buried", an adjective, is the complement of the copula "is". You can call it a participial adjective if you like, as it originates as a participle: I'm not sure what the value is in doing so.
Yay for the last sentence!
> Whether or not you call it a predicate nominative depends on what you mean by "nominative", which the writer of the page you linked to didn't specify. Again, I don't know what advantage there is in such a designation.
Yay, for the last sentence, again!
13:00
There is nothing wrong with certain kinds of repetition, especially in a story which is like a fairy tale. However, I do find the repeated genderless plural pronouns somewhat jarring (child...they; child...them). Other speakers might have a different reaction. — TRomano Oct 20 at 9:01
I felt exactly the same way!
 
2 hours later…
14:46
Phrase of the Day: for toffee
15:14
This appears to confuse "by" with "if," with a an ill-conceived gerund phrase (which may have been intended participially) thrown into the bargain. I think it means "If cards are filled out according to the new system..." — Rob_Ster 16 hours ago
The comment makes it sound like correcting By filing our cards according to the new system, another clerk will have to be hired to By filing our cards according to the new system, we have to hire another clerk is incorrect!
15:53
Hi @TomFreezers! Welcome to the room!
> And then when it happed any of them to be of great worship by his noble deeds, as there was no year that these failed, but some were dead, then was there chosen in his stead the most men of worship that were called the queen's knights.
^An interesting instance of subject-verb agreement
> then was there chosen in his stead the most men of worship that were called the queen's knights
16:15
0
A: The ambiguous "he is buried"

Gary BotnovcanThis "buried" is the so-called past participle.  The past participle is a non-finite verb form.  The other non-finite forms are the infinitive and the gerund.  "Non-finite" means something like unbounded.  There are two characteristics common to non-finite forms in English.  They are not bou...

A thought after reading the first third of the answer: to say that 'When a participle modifies a noun in the manner of an adjective, it seems reasonable to call it "an adjective participle" or "a participial adjective". Those are nothing but shorthand for "a participle doing an adjective's job".' is like saying that googled in I googled it (however newfangled it may sound) is a noun doing a verb's job.
BTW, what's the job of an adjective again?!
17:07
@DamkerngT. I know it's impossible to tell (0:
:D
@CowperKettle FYI, all of them. :D
@DamkerngT. I'm not surprised.
:D
(Sorry that it's no subs) "A life of a cat slave" -- motto at the end of the clip: "Learn how to be a good cat slave with Sheba (the brand)." :-)
@DamkerngT. Yes, I know, the over-priced brand, we have it here too (0:
17:16
> I love cats, but mainly through 55.
> ชอบ ผญ ครับ แมวน่ารักดี55
@CowperKettle "ชอบ ผญ ครับ แมวน่ารักดี55" ~ "I like the girl. The cat is cute 55 (haha)." :-)
OMG
What does "55" mean?
I thought he was some pervert, loving cats "through 55"
Laughter. :-)
I only know 69 though
@DamkerngT. ah!
Ugh! :D
17:18
(0:
I think machine translation still can't cope with internet-speak very well. :-)
17:28
3
Q: One-box is messing with my URL

M.A.R.Not sure if this is a bug or a feature, but if I link to specific sections of a Wikipedia article such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry, the link will look like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry#Molecule where "Molecule" is the section I'm linking to. However, when this one-boxes,...

@CowperKettle O.o
What does the I represent? A tie?
Seems so. :-)
BTW, @CowerKettle, it's not easy to tell, even among women! One of these four is not a real woman, and they sat together, questioned one another for almost an hour, and yet some of them guessed it wrong! youtube.com/watch?v=yozDmGHRYW8
(The reveal is at around 40:11.)
0
Q: Incorrect reputation history

GlorfindelThere's a strange thing going on with my reputation history. On June 30th, I supposedly voted down an answer. I can't remember if I did; it links to this answer and in any case I'm able to downvote it again. This record does not show up at all in my 'reputation log' (http://ell.stackexchange.c...

Chemistry is a branch of physical science that studies the composition, structure, properties and change of matter. Chemistry includes topics such as the properties of individual atoms, how atoms form chemical bonds to create chemical compounds, the interactions of substances through intermolecular forces that give matter its general properties, and the interactions between substances through chemical reactions to form different substances. Chemistry is sometimes called the central science because it bridges other natural sciences, including physics, geology and biology. For the differences between...
Hmm... it looks fine here. @M.A.R.
17:52
Chemistry is a branch of physical science that studies the composition, structure, properties and change of matter. Chemistry includes topics such as the properties of individual atoms, how atoms form chemical bonds to create chemical compounds, the interactions of substances through intermolecular forces that give matter its general properties, and the interactions between substances through chemical reactions to form different substances. Chemistry is sometimes called the central science because it bridges other natural sciences, including physics, geology and biology. For the differences between...
Weird.
I swear it didn't work the other day
Maybe it's something to do with the TeX addon in another room?
(MathJax or something similar)
18:08
I think we should leave this open because it is clearly a question about the English language and there's enough context for someone to write a reasonable answer. — snailplane ♦ 16 hours ago
@snailplane - I fully agree. I'm amazed there are 4 closevotes
Hi! @DamkerngT. How are you?
@user62015 Good, thanks!
How are you?
@CowperKettle Oh, +21!
I am great. Could you help me as I have a question?
To be honest, I skipped that question all along.
@user62015 What's the question?
1. He was too conscientious in the discharge of his duties "that he could not serve"that exploiter for long.
a. that he would not serve
b. for serving
c. to serve
d . No improvement
Thanks.
18:12
Huh?
How's the question formatted exactly?
You are requested to check "that he could not serve" in the question.
If you think we can replace then replace from the given options otherwise no improvement option.
I'm not sure if I can understand that sentence.
No matter how it's phrased.
hahahahha
but still any guess?
Well, I can't relate discharge of his duties to exploiter. I'd better leave it to others. :-)
ahahaha. Okay. I can understand
18:16
Are you sure the original sentence is correct? The end seems strange "that exploiter for long."
@TomFreezers It is Indian English ahahhaha
It was asked in a competition exam 3 days ago.
Another obvious problem with the choices is the original sentence and a appear to be in the opposite direction to b and c, so we need to be sure of its meaning. (And because I can't make exact sense of the meaning, I'd better pass. :-)
I had same issue DamkerngT.
I would say A) is the answer. The other answers seem odd to me.
Yes. I had the same feeling.
18:21
But a) would be a common mistake (of using too ... that for so ... that), I think.
too ... to ... is typical, but it doesn't make sense for me in this sentence.
d) would be similar to a), IMO.
(Admittedly, a) sounds a little better than the original.)
As a guy, I call my male friends "girlfriend" all the time. Unrelatedly, I get punched a lot. — QPaysTaxes 15 hours ago
:D
@user62015 Ah, I see. I think the answer is c).
I have to read this discharge as "perform".
18:33
C?
Are you sure?
Well, it's the only choice that makes sense to me, right now.
Okay.
The basic sense of the sentence is: He's too good a person to do such an immoral thing (for long).
You meant to say "to serve"?
18:36
Okay.
Thanks.
@DamkerngT. Dunno. We focused the issue on the room description
> He's too good a person (i.e., too meticulous in his duties) to serve such a bad person for long.
18:53
2
Q: Indirect object, proximity, and ambiguity

P. E. DantAs a lad I was taught that certain verbs such as "to say," "to describe," "to distribute," and "to explain" can take an indirect object only when it immediately follows a preposition, and that this indirect object can never immediately follow the verb. New learners of the language are still bein...

@DamkerngT. I "regret for" using objectionable words against a man so mighty a. repent for, b.sorry for, c.regret, d No improvement
Just regret is probably the best choice.
@user62015 Regret.
But a man so mighty, really?!
Who talks like that?!
Option C?
19:02
Uh-huh
It is just for a competition exam
@DamkerngT. Villains in kid cartoons
Today I took one such prep exam as well.
The sentences were ridiculous.
And I prolly ended up answering a couple of them wrong.
None of the options seemed to fit!
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
19:05
I took three tough exams today.
And the last was English.
Congrats on your survival!
I didn't feel like dumbing myself down to the level of the examiner to see what the answer will be.
At least that's what I always do.
@user62015 Hmm... maybe the question wants repent for.
It's not at all common, though, I think.
Are you sure? @DamkerngT.
How can I be sure? It's not easy to guess how the test designer thinks!
19:10
I agree.
We are on the same page.
'repent for' is prolly the choice, yeah.
"I witnessed some pastors in Korea use 'repent for' very frequently (and very energetically) in their sevices to drive the throng to give away their money lavishiy."
@user62015 After a certain point, it's not English knowledge, but the power of telepathy, that helps you ace an exam.
Okay.
@DamkerngT. They witnessed! They must be 200 years old since that's what the English looks like
19:12
:D
The Witness has spoken.
(12 Monkeys meme.)
I have some questions I know the answers but I just want to confirm the answers if you don't mind? These questions were asked in a competition exam 3 days ago.
Are all these and the previous two questions from the same exam?
@user62015 Sure
@M.A.R. "Sure, I do mind." you mean? :-)
ahahahahaha these are tough questions.
19:17
@DamkerngT. I'll eat the minding
Let me send one by one
The reason that I think repent for is a plausible choice is because I started to think that the test designer was aiming at a specific kind of English, which most people do not use.
I am senior than him by two years. No error senior to him
It's bad either way, than or to.
We can't change we have to find just the error
19:19
The exam is the error.
We always use senior to
Then it would be 'senior to'.
Stick to what your book says.
Do you think it is not right?
nods -- I think it's like the Terminator in T5. -- "You're nothing but a relic from a deleted timeline." -- So is this kind of English.
@user62015 Sometimes it's not about being right or wrong, but being a stupid non-native sentence and a correct, native one.
Do you see any other option?
I agree.
The first book that has He was senior to me in Google Books that's written by a native speaker dates back to 1840!
Please understand these kind of questions are asked in competition exams
I understand. It's just that I have to think of it like another language.
@DamkerngT. Teehee
19:24
HAHAHHAHA
@user62015 I'd use different words and different structures
Whatever is wrong with I'm two years older than him.?
I agree but if I ask you to find the grammatical error then I think you will choose the same option
Yes, I think your correction made it better.
Thanks. I am used to them. ahahahhahaha
When I finished writing the letter, I could not help admiring myself to have achieved the impossible.
Although it still doesn't look like something you should say in everyday speech. Or chat.
19:27
@user62015 :D
I would say "myself to achieve" the impossible
Oh, that was a sentence in the exam. I thought you were talking about what you did today.
I agree but please try to understand Indian also don't speak this way but examiners have to make the exams tough so they can choose good candidates
Hmm... my problem with that sentence is could not help admiring sounds too new.
If they ask in a normal language then anyone can answer no need to work hard
19:28
In the 19th century, it would've been could not help but admire.
Okay.
Okay. Maybe you right.
Let me check
@DamkerngT. Haha
@user62015 Either 'I could not help but admire . . . ' or 'I couldn't help admiring myself for having . . . '
I think, @DamkerngT. you are right. But do you think my point doesn
.....doesn't make sense?
to achieve instead of to have achieved?
@user62015 I think I've heard that myth, but I don't think it's really serious.
Now the problem is, did the test designer think the myth was real?
@user62015 To have achieved is actually okay in 19c English.
I also agree with your answer because they think the same way as you have just done. @DamkerngT. you are right because they ask questions this way.
3. I am glad that you are here. No error.
I think that is unnecessary here, what do you think?
19:35
This one should be fine.
Or maybe no error
That can be omitted, but including it doesn't make it wrong.
(In fact, I think it's probably required in 19c English.)
hahahaha
Soon you will understand how Indian competition works
ahahahah
19:37
@user62015 No error
He will be cured from his fever. No error I say cured of and you?
I agree @M.A.R.
I agree with your agreeing.
Next....
Though he is a gifted comedian, he prefers spend his spare time watching horror movies. No error
I say he prefers spending
19:40
You're right.
It's weird because other sentences sound old but the context of this sentence sounds rather new.
Thanks
You're welcome!
We don't speak this way
but are asked to face the competition
Next...
The writer of this poetry is Wordsworth. No error
I thought we were done!
Wordsworth is capitalized like that?
No, there are some questions but if you are busy you can skip them
Yes, same way
19:44
I think it's okay, then.
Yes.
Do you want me to continue?
I'll leave you to MAR. (^_^)
I know the answers but just want confirmation
Thanks for your time.
[email protected]. Shall we continue?
Later
Thank you so much.
19:46
I'm now busy.
Have to go AFK.
Bye for now. Thanks
20:43
Before time and space.
Anonymous
You're welcome to stick around if you'd like to help people with English :-)
Thank you.
21:12
Lost and found, eh? :-)
BTW, Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold History of English looks like an interesting book.
> And then he points out that borrowing vocabulary is not even unusual, but the way English grammar works is unique. It's not Germanic, it's not Romantic - it has some features that it shares (only) with Celtic languages, specifically Welsh and Cornish, but even there it doesn't match exactly.
21:32
0
Q: What does 'by right belongs' mean in this context?

SadiqI was reading a Islamic tradition which says "Therefore, whatever I decide for anyone which by right belongs to his brother, he must not take anything, for I am granting him only a portion of Hell." From my understanding, it seems to indicate it means, if he decides for someone and the judgement...

Hmm... I think it's better at Islam.SE as said in a comment. All minor language issues have already been solved in comments as well. Should we migrate it or something?
21:58
0
Q: Flaws in the voting model in re. questions

P. E. DantThis issue has been addressed scores of times. How can we improve our voting system? touches on some of the concerns which were exemplified today in two ELL questions (votes at the moment of this writing are in parens): The ambiguous "he is buried" (4) When a girl mentions her girlfriend, does ...

 
2 hours later…
23:45
Recent research shows brain-to-text device capable of decoding speech from brain signals

« first day (494 days earlier)      last day (3035 days later) »