« first day (20 days earlier)      last day (90 days later) » 

@jcprx: You're in!
@AlexClark: Incurrence is now the only owner of the room, so.
01:17
alright!
hello everyone.
hello!
hey Alex :)
user147690
Hey!
user147690
I just woke up xD
user147690
Actually, what are everyone's time zones?
-4, -7, +10 and then there's me
I will be between -3 and -7 at various times during this project
user147690
01:24
Alright, so I'll just set my other two windows clocks to -3 and -7 and it'll cover everyone else(probably not that necessary actually, -3 is just PM)
So like 1a GMT is the time that we would do group meetings, right? b/c that's 6p 9p 11a
user147690
Sure, that'll work fine for me(for most of the project) - for the last few weeks it might need to change, but I don't have my next semester schedule yet
I'm not sure that will ever be necessary but it's good to know that it's feasible.
yes, that's fine.
Alex do you have the chatjax thing enabled?
I never bothered to do it
so I don't know how
user147690
01:29
@EricStucky $\LaTeX$ in chat
3
user147690
Just a bookmarklet to click on each time you visit
:P there you go
Also I guess somehow I missed that the end of the project was at the beginning of your next semester
but I guess that makes sense
that is to enable latex in the chat?
user147690
My final exams for this semester are on 15th complex analysis, 19th functional analysis, 23rd abstract algebra II
user147690
01:33
$\frac{\color{green}{\LaTeX \text{works}}}{\color{red}{\large{\checkmark}}}$
Ah, I see it now
same
Also 15th! That's next Monday :/
user147690
Yep, I'll have to do long days to make up for doing both(this and exams), fortunately they are relatively distinct, so I can rest from one another by alternating
Yeah I wish I had realized this earlier, I would have tried to push it back a week to make the first week easier on you.
user147690
01:37
@EricStucky That's alright, next semester will probably be harder, so it's for the best
You're ridiculous <3
user147690
xD
user147690
So you have already done a heap of work on tropical geometry @Eric? I found some comment on the old wiki page for tropical geometry by you
Haha, not really. I know everything up to p171 in that article but that's about it
Tbth we were really hard pressed to relate the tropical geometry to the research problem.
user147690
@EricStucky And your blog post implied(atleast to me) that everyone didn't do too well?
01:39
haha I didn't want to be too strong about it but yeah
user147690
Were there many teams though?
Hm, maybe I shouldn't say this publicly :/
but
there were about 16 teams
user147690
That's actually way more than I expected
user147690
For the record, I am essentially always on chat(atleast in the main room, and I am awake)
Well then I guess you'll be the go-to when we want to talk with someone :D
user147690
01:49
@EricStucky Haha sure
user147690
Does anyone here code?
i'm a CS major so yes.
i use C++.
user147690
Oh good, I haven't done anything really for awhile(last was python a year ago, and matlab 2 years ago)
I know a small amount of mathematica and could be convinced to remember some Java
Actually I also have a medium-sized bunch of MATLAB code. That might actually be useful :P
never coded with matlab.
only java, c++, and obj-c so far.
01:57
It's kind of a pain in the butt. Probably one of the open source projects are better.
Objective C! Was that for a course?
yes a course i'm taking right now. :)
to eventually make apps with.
Weird. Did they talk about the philosophy behind using that language? I thought it wasn't very well liked.
Ah
ah-ha no.
albeit, my algos professor was a c++ fanatic.
he said it's the best programming language to use for many applications.
i'm incline to agree.
inclined*
I believe it :)
Haven't used it seriously but if it's basically C-like with an extra object oriented framework then it's hard to see how that could be bad.
Er, easy to see why it would be useful *
it is!
user147690
02:03
For latex: $\odot$ - $\odot$ - $\oplus$ -$\oplus$ - $\Bbb R^n$ - $\Bbb R^n$ - $\mathcal H$ - $\mathcal H$, $\bf x$ - $\bf x$
oh, is everybody here right now? that's neat
yeah!
If you click on the first starred message then it gives you some links to see the latex formatted in the chat
Oh gosh don't use bold format vectors ;_;
user147690
Haha that's what the document uses
user147690
Which do you prefer, overline, underline, arrow?
I prefer nothing. It's faster :P
user147690
02:06
(or just context)
user147690
Ok
user147690
$x\in\Bbb R^n$ - $x\in\Bbb R^n$
Yeah I mean it's nice to read but when I think of writing it I just get a bit sad :/
user147690
You can just use the define command though
user147690
$\def\o{\overline{x}}$ Now you could just $\o$ vectors for x
user147690
02:08
$\o$
Can I do that? $\o$
Haha that's a nice perk of the system :P
user147690
$\def\o{\overline{x}}$ is what I used there(you can actually break commands, by redefining actual ones)
I mean, I didn't have to define anything tho; it just let me use your command
user147690
Yep it will stay defined until my command leaves the page(which is hidden in my 'now you could just...' message)
user147690
Chatjax actually just renders the latex multiple times a second from top down
02:10
That's sensible.
Arright I probably need to head out for the evening. So I'm either going to bed or nightblogging, we'll see :D
Glad that everyone's made it :)
user147690
@EricStucky I'll start doing some pomodoros(for the pomodoro technique). Have fun!
i'll be working all day tomorrow on the tasks you assigned us. so i'll probably be on the chat as well during that time.
 
16 hours later…
18:27
@EricStucky i'm kind of confused about #3 of the polyhedral fan question. what do you mean by invent a classification scheme?
18:41
It's intentionally vague, but
there's a nice classification scheme of finite dimensional real vector spaces; it's the nonnegative integers and you specify one by choosing one
Abelian groups have a slightly more complicated scheme
positive integers themselves are classified by multisets of the prime numbers
So the idea is something like: find an object which somehow encodes all the 2dPFs
(#3 is definitely the hardest question on the PF side of the sheet, fwiw)
19:30
ah, i see what you mean. thanks for clearing that up.

« first day (20 days earlier)      last day (90 days later) »