« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (351 days later) » 

 
1 hour later…
06:14
Added him fb nvm
^^
@user223679
06:30
Facebook? @Mann
Yes.
I guess he declined my invitation. :/
:OOO
Hahahaha :D
I didn't got replied to my messages either :|
0
Q: complex nos in ellipse.

DineshI was practising some ques on ellipses when I came a criss this question: If normal at four points $(x_1,y_1)$..... on the ellipse $\dfrac{x^2}{a^2}+\dfrac{y^2}{b^2}=1$ are concurrent then find the value of $$(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4)\left(\frac{1}{x_1}+\frac{1}{x_2}+\frac{1}{x_3}+\frac{1}{x_4}\right)...

Yes
Sorry connection prob
Ah np , so did you let $z=re^{i\theta}$ ?
In polar form?
06:34
No. r=1
Why would r=1 :O
Well there would be two problem with it, it wouldn't really make an ellipse in an ellipse r is a function of theta
Check this
In mathematics, an ellipse is a curve on a plane surrounding two focal points such that the sum of the distances to the two focal points is constant for every point on the curve. As such, it is a generalization of a circle, which is a special type of an ellipse that has both focal points at the same location. The shape of an ellipse (how 'elongated' it is) is represented by its eccentricity, which for an ellipse can be any number from 0 (the limiting case of a circle) to arbitrarily close to but less than 1. Ellipses are the closed type of conic section: a plane curve that results from the ...
In the original eqn we have sin x. and cosx. . So I let z=cos+i sin
This z i s not in polar corrdinate
But $z$ specify what in your equation?
We have cos x and sin x in equation right
Yes
I haven't made it or tested it however
06:37
So. I put cos + i sin =some z
So I replaced cos by (z +1/z)/2 and so
Hmm can you send me the equation you have?
Hi robert!
Btw, if you got the 4th degree eqn, the 1st bracket is sum of the roots while the second is (summation of three at a time)/(product of roots) @Dinesh
I believe he has already done it like that.
06:40
U r wrong
We want $x_1$
Which is cos theta
Which is (z+1/z)/2
So 1/x_1 means z^2/(z^2+1)
Isnt your equation like $-(a^2-b^2)x'^4+2ha^2(a^2-b^2)x'^3+x'^2(....)-2a^4h(a^2-b^2)x'+a^6h^2$
Oh! You got the eqn in z and not x. I didn't read the question properly.
Yeah
In z
Can x' has value 3?
think
And in eq z^2 term does not occur
06:43
Or can x' attain values greater than 1
How are you even commenting on the range of x
Well you defined z= cos + i sin doesn't that represent a unit circle?
So if x attains any value greater than 1 it's over.
or even under
Well don't put z graphically
Uh ok let's suppose x is just that nvm
How did you simplify?
after
I didn't put z=cos+i sin. Instead I put cos =(z+1/z)/2 and so on. Notice the difference between the two claims
I got the equation as
06:47
Let me get link for mathjax sec
Z^4(a^2-b^2)+z^3(2iyb-2ax)+z(2ax+2iyb)-(a^2-b^2)
Open it and render mathjax
Start*
$\frac{1}{2}$
Works
$$Z^4(a^2-b^2)+z^3(2iyb-2ax)+z(2ax+2iyb)-(a^2-b^2$$
Yes works does it for you?
Nope but I will manage. Hope u see me equation
06:52
Yes, Pretty much. just drag the link of start mathjax into your bookmark
Come on this chat and click the bookmark
Done
3
Q: 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine test

user223679I found this reaction over here: which illustrates the carbonyl test but looks fuzzy. Assuming that the R in the product is a typo for H, I couldn't conserve the number of Nitrogen atoms. What is the correct reaction? Is this correct? Is there a possibility of a methyl substitution ...

@Mann
Cool
Let me see
I am on mobile so can't do it. But I'll type in latex . Its fine
Exactly what i was thinking xD
Ow mobile
I see
I don't really see the origin of this statement :'(, can not understand where you got it from. What was your initial question "If the normals at four points $(x_i,y_i)$ on the ellipse are concurrent then value of $x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4$ $(1/x_1 +1/x_2$ etc?
@user223679 , the methyl was probably biggest typo
xD
Yeah that was it
07:00
So why would you want to do it in complex number? You would still have to extract the "real part" of it in the solution leading to same equation.
@Mann The reason why I gave up.
Hahha D: Askiitan are sometimes weird
Giving so many things without any reason or proof
GG
@Mann I gave up on that Complex number question, and regarding askiitians, I gave up on it last year ;)
Ahahahahhahaha I see. xD
Ofcourse, weird things on it i see.
Still trying the complex one though
I still believe x should be represent by $\frac{z+\bar z}{2}$
@Mann Can you create chat rooms ?
07:04
Yes.
With restricted entry?
But it would create too much mess this is fine.
Nope I guess D:
Never tried
@Mann u are right . x is $\frac{z+\bar z}{2}$ except for the fact that its $\frac{z+\frac{1}{z}}{2}$
Did you use equation of normal in parametric form?
Wait
The reason for this is that, this room has been converted into a discussion room while it was meant to be a continuation of the comments of the original answer to ADG's question. @Mann
07:08
I know haha, but not a problem. It just works fine.
I don't mind it as long as someone does not come in and yells at us for making this room a mess ;)
Ahahaha, but there are already too many messages above anyway it wouldn't matter.
Or we can always change name
OH damn , okay new room
Indeed
This room has no owners. It belongs to that answer and the name most probably can't be changed.
I suggest we call in a mod. He can shift the useless messages to our new room.
07:11
Uh not really the best idea, not all messages are so nice in here are they? x
Oh, I see @Dinesh now what had you mean, tried this in parametric form
But they wont be relevant over here atleast. Better shift them over there.
Uh i guess you are right.
You all continue with the complex number question, while I go in search of a mod with lots of free time ;)
Yeah. Now you got
So i have my equation all in terms of cos
4th power
But still it's perfect in here why would you still have to use complex number instead of cos
07:16
Bcz u can't proceed easily with cos equation. So instead convert everything in just z and we get a 4th power eq in z
It's very easy in actual
Multiply the roots of cos with a and you got x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4
Ohh I got it. I did it this way because I solved every conormal ques in z and got easy results. Thanks anyways
Weird, I never tried that though! Must try these somedays haha
Yeah u easily get the results this way. Like if parametric angles are a,b,c,d then a+b+c+d=odd multiple of pi.... and so on
:OOO, Interesting. I think i sometimes keep things to mainstream aa.
Wait a+b+c+d wasn't that the condition for con-cyclic points?
07:26
Nope. A,b, c,d are angled
Angles
Yes angles of con cyclic points on ellipse sorry.
Moreover we can use complex nos easily to show if 4 points are concyclic
:O
Any four general points
Wait. I'll tell ya
I don't remember much about complex number it seems, :| Gotta do much revision. Was it with rotation theorem?
07:29
z_1 be a complex no. Then we can rotate z as $z_2=z_1 cis(\theta)$
Hello?
Oh yes, I remember that rotation theorem np.
HI!
Someone rang?
Ah ha!
07:29
You got a minute? @Pureferret
Not sure I'd I can up and lift chats elsewhere
But I have a minute
Cool sorted then :D
So you can shift these messages? @Pureferret
I believe the opposite points must be diameters of an circle! @Dinesh right?
or not
Not necessary
07:31
Nevermind.
Nope
checked it
Do u know how to do it easily by complex NOs ( how to show 4 points are con cyclic)
Nope, even If i would, by now i would have forgotten that. :(
@user223679 which ones and where?
If a, b, c, d are 4 points and a,b,c,d are come led nis then if they are con cyclic then
$\frac{(a-b)(c-d)}{(a-c)(b-d)}$ is purely real
@Mann Did you create a new room?
07:36
Umm no, wait let me do it
It can be done by a room owner I think...
@Pureferret The problem is, these messages are owned by the answer/comments from where it started. So no owners.

 We love math, physics, chemistry and

Random Talk. If you don't understand the talk, hardluck!
Nice one @Dinesh !
@Pureferret I know its too much but, all messages after this one:
Whosoever owns this room, click on the roomâ–¼ link then select the comments
07:38
13 hours ago, by user223679
Hello guys!
I'd like to prove that :D
@user223679 no, I said room owners. The comments from the answer comments will be owned by the person who commented
Who owns the room?
Heck let me make that you @user223679
I'm in mobile so I can't ctrl-click them
Yes! @user223679 for president! D:
Ow
@Mann Check whether you are the owner -_-
How do i do that. **
07:41
Click info
Seems not, I have never owned anything in my life D:
Nope
Doesn't show any owner
Yes! Thats why I thought of calling in a mod. Maybe they can shift/overide these stuff.
@Dinesh , can't get a nice proof. do you know D:
@StackExchange Boom. By a landslide victory @user223679 is now president
@user223679 if you click on roomâ–¼ and then in move/delete you should see instructions
Cool. I actually owned something, interesting. Thanks
!
07:44
Tbh, you could just rename this chat
@Pureferret Thanks. But I just realized that a person on mobile can't multiselect(you had the same problem). So @Mann please shift them.
And with that, I shall disappear into the night
Hail pureferret
@MannJust changed it.
301 messages moved from We Love Maths
Done
07:47
@Mann use this: if 4 points are con cyclic then angles in same arc ate equal
And then use concept of complex slope
See if u can do from that
@Dinesh The other room please.
OH
This in indeed better
Nope, I was never so good with complex number d:
@Mann You made the new room, I just changed everything about this room!! Let me see if I can restore stuff back.
Got it!
@Mann @Dinesh Go to the new room please.
07:51
Or maybe not
ok
Left other room.
>Still trying to prove concyclicity
>Failing
>Fml
@Mann There are few messages left to shift, the ones of Dinesh. Shift them here. I tidied up the other room in case someone goes there, and make me the owner over here too ;)
Ok, but i already left other room **
How to make owner
Firstly, go back over there and shift the 5-6 messages.
13 messages moved from Discussion between ADG and Mann‌​
Ok
Great!! Now go to info and [add user] as owner.
@Mann ?
08:01
Trying **
Not able to woot
Where to do it
Go over here(chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/23760/we-love-math) , scroll down. Under owners, on the RHS there will be [add user]. Search my name.
@Dinesh , be mine savior and bring me forth to thine light. **
@Mann Hello!! Did you try?
Trying lol wait screenshot
Okay. Go to [access] tab. You are currently on [general].
Go over [here](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/23760/we-love-math?tab=access) and user223679
user223679 scroll down. Under owners, on the RHS there will be [add user]. Search my name.
08:08
Did i made it!?
Wait screen
Ah
I need 100rep to be a owner. Else a mod has to make me, like Purefeet did. You be the owner till that time. I will soon get rep and then you make me.
Ah yes, just answer some nice questions np
Here easy one
0
Q: Finding the points of intersection on a circle

JuxhinBefore addressing my issues, below is the question from a past examination paper along with a diagram I dre in order to facilitate readers. 3(a) A circle has center $C(5, 8)$ and radius $\sqrt{29}$ (ii) The circle cuts the y-axis at $R$ and $Q$, where $Q$ is above $R$. Find the coordin...

@Mann Yes. Gtg. see you later.
Uh cya, I should study or maybe eat then x
@Mann I will gain rep soon. But right now, I have to go. Cya.
 
2 hours later…

« first day (1 day earlier)      last day (351 days later) »