« first day (384 days earlier)      last day (114 days later) » 

00:11
@Catija It seems so!
 
18 hours later…
17:58
0
Q: Is this question "reopenable" by a single vote?

RathonyWe vote to close a question which is not in accordance with the rules and guidelines specified on Help Center of ELL. We need consensus (five votes unless a moderator is involved) to decide whether it should be closed or not. We vote to reopen a question which was unduly closed (by misundersta...

18:23
@PhMgBr Hi
@Rath hullo
@PhMgBr Read the question again. I am not raising an issue on whether a mod should have a single hammer or not. I am raising an issue on how it should/could/might be used. Gold dupehammer is a good example. The decision to reopen the question is completely arbitrary and uncalled for. A single vote would have been enough to get consensus of this community. — Rathony 10 mins ago
No no @Rath, it's perfectly fine to question mod actions, and reopens on the site.
I just saw your latest comment. Digging a bit more into the topic doesn't make a difference.
It does. It's all about answers. If the answers do not satisfy the OP, it's not a dupe.
@PhMgBr 5 users agreed the question is a dupe.
@Rathony And 1 user believed that it isn't. Considering the user-base that can close, none of these numbers are meaningful.
18:25
You know better than me how simple it is to use "which" or "that".
Esp. considering the fact that a lot of dupe close-votes are pile-on.
(A lot of reopen votes are pile-on too, but it doesn't apply in this case)
ELL's votes are all pile ons
Used to be.
I don't want to see one moderator reopen a question.
I don't care about one moderator closing a question.
@Rathony This sentence implies you're against the single-vote feature.
Which I asked for in my first comment.
If you're questioning the closure/reopen of a question, then the single vote discussion is irrelevant.
@PhMgBr I am not against the single vote feature as long as it is used reasonably
If you're discussing why they have the binding vote, then the reopen is irrelevant.
Choose one.
18:29
@PhMgBr I have never raised such an issue on ELU.
@Rathony So are you against it, or not?
I am not. absolutely
Are you against it in your meta post?
Nope
@Rathony Then if you're discussing the question's reopening, the single vote is unrelated.
Remove it from your question.
18:30
Why?
Let the meta post focus on the reopen.
I don't think it is fair
Meta.ELL posts are already too fruitless when focused on a single topic.
Let alone two.
My point is it is not fair for one vote to override 5 votes.
Now you are against the binding vote.
18:32
Yeap. I am against it.
Then the reopen is irrelevant.
Yeap.
If you want to discuss it, open another meta post.
As long as it is exercised in the right way
I am fine.
In democracy, one vote can't override 5 votes.
Your current meta title should only contain "why can a mod's single vote override the vote of five members of the community"?
18:34
Is my question misleading?
And your post should contain your thoughts on this, maybe marginally referring to the reopen instance.
@Rathony Right now it's impossible to tell which you wanna discuss.
And a piece of advice: Don't use the words "unfair", "treatment" etc. in your post.
OK. Let's wait for other users' responses
@Rath I'm deleting the obsolete comments now.
What do you mean by "open another meta post"?
Write another one, I mean.
18:37
For?
Discussing whether that question should be closed, or remain open.
Don't question the mod's decision, because that's not related to the current state of the question.
Don't question the mod's decision. That statement is very risky
I will always question the mod's decision.
The mod is not a dictator.
If (s)he behaves like one, (s)he should be removed. That's a democratic process.
I'm not saying not to question his decision.
Don't question it in that post.
Well, I think I am the only one who can do it on ELL.
That post is a place for you to discuss the closure and the reopen of a question.
18:40
I don't give a fuck.
You're interpreting that incorrectly... It's not about requesting an explanation for their action rather than saying that the action is wrong.
You can't know why the action was taken.
@Rathony Do give a fuck if you want results.
... unless you ask.
If you don't, then maybe you're just looking for some argument.
@Catija Hello.
@PhMgBr Well, I am not looking for some argument. I am looking for explanation.
18:43
And what are you going to do with that explanation?
But you phrase it as an attack on you and the five voters... instead of simply asking "why was this decision made?". There's no reason to phrase it the way you have.
Well, it depends on explanations.
@Rathony You're looking at this the wrong way.
Mods in some cases do need to make unilateral decisions on things... but what is important is understanding why.
You should be the person that helps build a building, not stand aside and nitpick on builders' actions.
18:44
@Catija If one vote overrides five votes, it could be interpreted that way.
Providing that you are here to help.
@Rathony Don't interpret it that way.
Try to be constructive, not like the police.
You're not the police.
@PhMgBr Do you know how many my comments on dupe were deleted?
72,892?
No, 1000000000
@Rathony Are you missing that I'm saying that it is sometimes appropriate...?
18:46
When is it appropriate @Catija?
When the five users are in the wrong.
You're assuming you're right and he's wrong.
That pre-assumption is gonna get you downvotes, and no useful results.
Just another headache out of a meta discussion.
@Rathony When the five users are wrong... or the users don't understand site policies... or any number of reasons.
@PhMgBr What I am trying to say is 5 users agreed and you are not supposed to override their decision by one single vote. That's all
@Rathony Why not?
@Rathony Um... no. That's not part of the site rules anywhere.
18:48
Are you saying any mod actions done that override some users' actions all over the SE are unjustified?
Hahahahahaha no.
BBL dinner
@PhMgBr Again, you misinterpreted my intention. I absolutely agree with what a moderators can do. I don't agree with a single vote that can reopen a post which was closed by 5 votes.
> You misinterpreted me. I agree that mods should do X. But mods shouldn't do X.
yeap. mods shouldn't do x
@PhMgBr What difference does it make?
No differences.
I just quickly ate dinner and am back. :P
@PhMgBr I got to go.
18:54
See ya.
One thing.
Fairness
Yeah, fairness. Don't assume you're always right and the other side's wrong.
@PhMgBr Yeap. I would not have voted to reopened the question if I had had the power.
Big difference.
@Rathony Look man. We're running in circles.
First you were questioning the question's reopening, then mod's binding vote, then reopening, then again mod's binding vote.
Unless you want to choose one topic, I get the feeling J.R. is in your debt and you're asking for your money, rather trying to have a friendly conversation in the end of which everyone goes home happy.
@PhMgBr Well, it depends.
18:59
It shouldn't depend.
@PhMgBr As long as ELL is managed as it is supposed to be, why would I ask such a question?
If you want to have a productive interaction, you should only look for the latter.
Friendly conversation, friendly criticism, leading by example.
You're not in a court.
@PhMgBr Can you post an answer to the NOW reopened question? Please go ahead.
@Rathony You fix problems step-by-step. They won't go away if you say you can't fix them.
@Rathony I haven't posted an answer on ELL for some months and I do not wish to break that record, thankuverymuch.
@PhMgBr Well, a problem on ELl is fixed step by step. More attention is required. ]
19:01
What is the problem? A mod?
@PhMgBr Well, let's see.
No.
Tell me what you have in mind.
@PhMgBr Later. I got to run tomorrow and need to sleep.
See you.
Night.
 
4 hours later…
Anonymous
23:23
@Rathony Please, try to keep the discussion friendly.
coming in ...
23:59
leaving ...

« first day (384 days earlier)      last day (114 days later) »