« first day (103 days earlier)      last day (395 days later) » 

Anonymous
22:10
@DamkerngT. And since I thought the existing answer was false, I tried writing my own . . . we'll see what people think of that one :-)
Anonymous
I do tend to rely on data from native speakers when writing answers sometimes on Japanese.SE
@snailboat Yay!
Anonymous
I usually avoid writing answers when people ask what sounds natural, etc., based on my own intuition
Anonymous
I have to rely on my intuition when I speak, but I'm afraid to teach based on my intuition :-)
Anonymous
I know non-native speakers can write useful answers based on intuition.
Anonymous
22:14
But I think most of the wrong answers I see from non-native speakers are when they're relying on their own intuition, but it wasn't good enough to base an answer on.
Anonymous
So it makes me worry a bit when I'm writing myself.
Anonymous
I mean, it's hard enough to write correct answers about English :-)
@snailboat I think they're usually wrong when they base their intuition on Unenglish. :-)
Anonymous
22:31
@DamkerngT. What worries me is this:
Anonymous
Sometimes I know when I make mistakes.
Anonymous
Sometimes I don't know when I make mistakes! :-)
Anonymous
Although I think I've actually got a pretty good internal grammar of Japanese, now.
@snailboat But we've got a lot of peers to review our answers. ;-)
Anonymous
That doesn't necessarily mean I always interpret things with the same meaning a native speaker would, or that I come up with natural-sounding utterances . . .
Anonymous
22:32
Grammar is only so useful.
Anonymous
I love grammar, though :-)
Anonymous
Grammar does seem kind of limitless, though. No matter how much I learn, there are always more interesting corners of a language waiting to be discovered.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yes!
Anonymous
Japanese.SE is getting better in that regard.
I came up with two important concepts that could compete with grammar: familiarity and analogy.
Anonymous
22:33
I'm really glad Japanese.SE has native speakers who are willing to post criticism or downvote.
@snailboat Yay!
Anonymous
In 2013, at the site's lowest usage, there were very few native speakers, and it was starting to look like the site wasn't going that well.
Anonymous
I think ELL could use a little more friendly criticism.
Anonymous
We've got lots of native speakers (though an oddly low linguist ratio).
@snailboat Indeed. I remember that it was friendlier.
Then again, maybe because some people tire of seeing more and more things they think are wrong.
Anonymous
22:37
@DamkerngT. Oh, yeah.
Anonymous
Stack Exchange Fatigue Syndrome!
LOL -- Nice name!
Anonymous
But, to be fair, most people are wrong a lot. You can't go through life getting upset over it.
Anonymous
nods -- It's really hard to strike a good balance.
@snailboat Haha!
Anonymous
22:39
It's funny because it's true :-)
I think it's normal when we somehow attach ourselves to something.
For me, I feel almost indifferent when I see something wrong on other sites. I just thought "Oh, again". But when I see something wrong or doubtful on ELL, I will start to write something on Language Overflow, at the very least. :-)
Anonymous
Phew, someone upvoted that angle brackets meta answer
Anonymous
I was getting a little self-conscious about my silly meta post getting bumped every few weeks :-)
The angle brackets meta answer?
Anonymous
Yeah.
Anonymous
22:44
Um.
Anonymous
7
Q: Angle brackets to indicate orthography

snailboatChoosing the right ‹angle brackets› Linguists often enclose letters in angle brackets to let people know they're talking about orthography (the way things are written). But Unicode has lots of different angle brackets, some of which don't show up for everyone, and some of which look funny. Whi...

Anonymous
I wrote this meta post.
Anonymous
It's had an answer for a long time, but it was scored 0, so Community kept bumping the question.
Oh, I remember that one!
Anonymous
Someone finally upvoted the answer, so it should stop getting bumped :-)
Anonymous
22:44
I was actually thinking I should upvote the answer, but I didn't.
Anonymous
I kept forgetting to.
Anonymous
+1 Note that this is eye dialect and doesn't reflect the actual pronunciation, which is more like /'hwɛɹ̥/, with an extended /ɛ/ and a strongly syllabic /ɹ̥/ — StoneyB 58 mins ago
Anonymous
I wonder if it might not make sense to write /rr/
Anonymous
See, I imagine there tends to be a slight dip in intensity, a rearticulation representing the division between the two /r/ sounds
Anonymous
As in mirror
Anonymous
22:48
Hey, check out mirror: ja.forvo.com/word/mirror/#en
@snailboat I remember that in A Bug's Life, I heard a character pronounced mirror as "mere-yer".
Anonymous
The first and third pronunciations are AmE, which is what I'm focusing on.
Anonymous
But they're very different pronunciations.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I'd be interested to hear that! I don't have that movie, so I can't check for it myself.
@snailboat I might have it recorded in the set-top box. But you can imagine it, right?
Anonymous
22:49
I can't.
Anonymous
I mean, I think what I'm imagining is not the same thing as what you're describing.
browsing...
Anonymous
I'd like to hear it so I can understand better :-)
Oh, wait! I found an interesting website last night. Maybe it's helpful.
Anonymous
22:51
Also, I was pronouncing mirror in a monotone, but I suppose the second /r/ is often noticeably lower in pitch!
Anonymous
That's another argument against writing rː, I guess.
Oh, I misremember it. It was warrior.
Anonymous
Oh!
But I remember that I heard /r/ as if it's a /y/.
Anonymous
Well.
Anonymous
22:54
/i/ is the vowel version of /j/ (the 'y' sound)
Anonymous
We tend to treat it as a consonant phoneme /j/ when it patterns like a consonant phoneme (part of the syllable onset or coda), and as a vowel phoneme /i/ when it patterns like a vowel phoneme (part of the syllable nucleus)
Anonymous
But phonetically, in isolation, it can be difficult to distinguish between j and i
Anonymous
So if we say /ˈwɔr.i.ər/
Anonymous
Isn't it easy to imagine reinterpreting it as /ˈwɔr.jər/?
22:56
It sounds like /ˈwɔr.jiər/ to me. :D
Anonymous
There might be an actual phonetic difference between the two (for example, /j/ might have less of a sustained vowel sound before it changes, and have more of a gradual shift into the following vowel sound)
Anonymous
So I don't necessarily mean to say that they're identical, but it's very easy for me to imagine a 'y' sound in warrior
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. What does that mean? A particularly palatalized /i/?
Anonymous
If I say war, ye, err, it sounds pretty funny to me :-)
Anonymous
22:58
Oh! Right. You gave me a link. :-)
Don't the warriors in the two clips sound a bit like "waryiorz"? :P
Anonymous
Haha! It sounds like woyers
Anonymous
I totally don't hear the /r/.
Anonymous
You don't think I've offended the woyers, do you!?
23:00
LOL
Anonymous
First of all, I'd like to thank the woyers
Anonymous
So, um, /ˈwɔjərz/ :-)
Anonymous
I wonder what other people hear.
Anonymous
Maybe I'm weird for hearing /ˈwɔjərz/
23:02
I think I hear them as First of all, I'd like to thank the woryers and You don't think I've offended the woryiers, do you!?
I wonder if it's really kosher for that site to have all the sentences of each movie available online.
(If it's really okay, I'd love to build a similar site.)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. By all, do you mean all the sentences in the entire movie?
@snailboat It appears so.
Anonymous
Or do you mean all as in "all the ones they have up there (which is a lot)"
Anonymous
Oh, I see!
Basically, I think the site chop the entire sound track of a movie into pieces corresponding to the subtitles.
And they do this with perhaps all well-known movies.
Which makes it very interesting.
(I've thought of something similar, but a little better, but the copyrights would be a big problem, in my opinion, so I haven't done it.)
Anonymous
23:14
@DamkerngT. Well, you know, lots of people have established fairly successful businesses by ignoring the law.
Anonymous
Some of those businesses later get sued into the ground, like Grooveshark.
nods -- They seem to claim "fair use" on their site.
Anonymous
Others get passed over for various reasons.
Anonymous
I was rather unhappy Grooveshark sold my music without paying me anything.
23:16
They did that!?
Anonymous
Yeah. That was sort of their business model ;-)
Eww...
Anonymous
Though they got shut down, and then just recently the CEO was found dead in his home―very sad
Oh! That's a bit sad.
Anonymous
Although they said it wasn't because of the Grooveshark shutdown. In fact, he said it was a relief not to have those lawsuits hanging over his head anymore.
Anonymous
23:18
That's what I read, anyway.

« first day (103 days earlier)      last day (395 days later) »