Can we have markup for example sentences, as distinct from actual quotes? And markup to distinguish a correct example from an incorrect one? (Strikethrough is a poor substitute.)
PEU 242.7 (look at) says that look at can be followed by either object + -ing or object + infinitive, with an implication that "object + infinitive" is AmE.
I've been thinking of how 'yet' in the affirmative statement works. I think [1] through [3] work but I'm not sure about [4].
[1] A: We've got to hurry!
B: Calm down. It's early yet.
[2] A: Is he coming back soon? Has he finished his job in Beijing?
B: No, he has two years yet.
[3] We have a ...
nods -- That was quite the same feeling I had the first time I saw that entry.
Anonymous
An example of that is have got for possession. In AmE we usually say I don't have any change while in BrE I haven't got any change is more frequent, but both are grammatical in both dialect groups
It sounds better at the end, because if you say it first, you're telling your listener that what you're about to ask isn't really that important or something for him to really worry about. If, by contrast, you say it at the end you give him the chance to be magnanimous and do you a great favor. — pazzo13 hours ago
Since their meat isn't Halal, Iranians don't keep them for meat.
@DamkerngT. All of this is partially dependent on your genes.
There's a recent trend in Iran wherein people claim
> Ah! See that guy? He says he eats one third of me and still he weighs twice as much as me. Corpulent dork! There's no such thing as genes being involved. It's just eating.
While they're wrong.
Oh my! What's that 5001 next to my name?
It just couldn't be 5000.
Anonymous
13:12
Sorta. Anyone can gain weight by overeating and anyone can lose weight by undereating.
@snailboat no is considered as a central determiner, and such is used both as predeterminer as well as postdeterminer....but then why we don't use such no? :O