« first day (27 days earlier)      last day (471 days later) » 

Anonymous
18:01
I don't really have a reason to buy a book about legal writing at the moment
Anonymous
I'm too lazy to find out for myself what the difference is between them :-)
Anonymous
I'm having tea! That's more important.
@snailboat Oh, I'll make some for me too!
Aww, Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage ハードカバー won't ship to here.
Anonymous
Mean!
Anonymous
Hey, is there an e-book version?
Anonymous
18:07
Oh, that's the legal one
Anonymous
There's a Kindle version of the other one
Anonymous
I found out recently there was an e-book version of Native Listening
Anonymous
Look, it's only $18 in e-book form!
Neat! Thanks for the link!
18:09
The cover sorta reminds me of The Lord of the Rings.
Anonymous
It has some of the research I've discussed here before about how people perceive spoken language
Anonymous
Native and non-native
Anonymous
@Fantasier It is a fancy cover, isn't it?
Anonymous
A lot of linguistics stuff either has an ugly cover or a stock cover shared by a zillion other books
18:12
Fancy indeed :-)
fancying writing a book titled 'Non-Native Listening' ... :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Ah, but the book is all about that, too :-)
Anonymous
It's about how our minds work
Oh, no!
Anonymous
She's a psychologist and a linguist
18:13
So much psycholinguistics :-P
and cognitive science.
Anonymous
Yeah, it's what you call psycholinguistics
2nd attempt: fancying writing a book titled 'Non-Native Listening: Like a Machine' ... :-)
Oh, by the way, why did we need to create this room? Was there anything wrong with the old room?
(with a sub-title: How to beat Siri at your second language) :P
@Fantasier There are two main reasons, actually.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Don't let me stop you from pondering writing a book, by the way! :-)
Anonymous
18:15
I do think it's a good book to read. Twenty years of research went into it
@snailboat Oh, I've already added her book to my Wish List. :-)
Anonymous
Another frustrating thing about linguistics books: A lot of them aren't really intended to be bought by individuals
Anonymous
They expect them to be purchased by university libraries and the like
Anonymous
And their prices are often astronomical
18:16
Yeah... They are usually not affordable :-\
The first time I looked the CGEL up to see the price. I was shocked. lol
Anonymous
Well, there are books that cost in the hundreds of dollars that are just a couple hundred pages
@Fantasier Oh, yeah? I'm still shocked, though. :P
Anonymous
CGEL is at least a monumental work
Anonymous
Reference grammars are always expensive.
Anonymous
Unless you get them used.
Anonymous
18:17
Which I recommend, if possible :-)
Anonymous
I got Martin's Reference Grammar of Japanese (1975) for $11!
@snailboat Wow, that's super-cheap!
Anonymous
Right now I'm focusing on getting books about Japanese
It's a little inconvenient. If I want to use it, I have to borrow it from the library.
Anonymous
Or general linguistics
Anonymous
18:18
@Fantasier Yeah. Though some libraries don't let you take their reference books.
@snailboat Luckily, mine does. But still, it's much better if I have it on my shelf. Anytime I'm curious it's within my reach.
Anonymous
Next on the list might be Comrie's Tense
At the moment, all non-Kindle books on Amazon (used) I tried gave me this message: Sorry, this item can't be shipped to your selected address.
Anonymous
$25, not exorbitant :-)
Anonymous
I need to read about relative and absolute tense
Anonymous
18:20
I've read about it in the context of Japanese, but I know Comrie wrote about it and his book is considered a standard introduction on the topic
Anonymous
But I've never read it
1
Q: Why "truly" instead of "truely"?

broccoli forestIs there any reason, historical or grammatical etc? Why isn't this tolerated like "judgement" or "blueish"? I couldn't find related posts around here or EL&U forum as far as I searched. I'd truely appreciate your answers...

Ah, should we close it or leave it?
It's interesting, though. Then again, I feel like it's an etymology question.
Looks like an English Stack question.
Anonymous
The ELL answer might simply be that it's arbitrary at this point
Anonymous
18:25
It doesn't reflect pronunciation and the spelling isn't related to any productive process
Anonymous
...I think
Anonymous
I don't actually know the answer to the question
Anonymous
broccoli forest is a linguist in Japan
But his point is actually quite interesting :-)
Oh, broccoli forest is their name!
(Well, pseudonym, I guess)
18:28
I wonder what (stab) in their profile means. :-)
Anonymous
@Fantasier Before I ever saw the name broccoli forest, I felt that broccoli were tiny giant trees
Umm... tiny giant trees? :D
^There must be a good linguistic term for it.
I tried googling broccoli tree and got something, um, that can be related to what you said.
Anonymous
18:30
Anonymous
See, they're like very very big trees, if they were very very little
Oh, look who's here! Hi, @MARamezani!
Who's here? Worried
Anonymous
All of us, I think
Anybody missed me?
18:31
Oops, wrong one :-P
@MARamezani No worries. We just miss you.
Um.. missed, I think.
^ could be the "original" size of broccoli.
@Fantasier I love Photoshop.
@MARamezani I don't. It's expensive.
@Fantasier You can subscribe to it now.
$10 a month
Anonymous
18:33
I bought Photoshop CS2 a long time ago.
Anonymous
I've never needed anything newer :-)
...and regretted it.
Yeah... I think we don't really need anything newer than CS2.
Anonymous
No, I'm relatively happy with my purchase, though I don't use it all the time
My first Photoshop experience was 7. It was good enough back then :-)
Anonymous
18:34
I have a couple art tablets to go with it
Anonymous
One's a big 21" Cintiq, and the other is a little tablet that takes a lot less space :-)
Wow, you have Cintiq!
Like a digital artist :-)
Anonymous
Yeah! Like! :-)
How many days have I been gone?
I've been through hell.
Anonymous
I mean, technically I am what you might call an artist, but that word is probably far too kind
18:36
Hullo @AndrewKolenteew!
Anonymous
@MARamezani A lot. A lot of days. Where've you been?
I bet my drawing skill is worse than yours. :P
@MARamezani Keep going! (Like they said)
@snailboat In Iran.
Anonymous
Welcome to the Cabin, @AndrewKolenteew!
I'm not back though.
18:37
From where?
This is my subconsciousness.
@snailboat thank you)
Anonymous
@MARamezani Your subconscious is good at typing.
@MARamezani hello
I've/He's been practicing ya know.
18:39
There are keyboards in hell?
Or typewriters?
Or... what came before typewriters?
@MARamezani I haven't understood you
@AndrewKolenteew Where? Last message? Don't worry though. I don't understand myself too.
Anonymous
@AndrewKolenteew Don't worry, MARamezani is silly :-)
Especially after the effing exams.
@MARamezani Ok) I speak English enough well, but I'd like to improve my English, to speak it not worse than native speakers. That's why I need practice\
18:43
@MARamezani Now I see what you meant by hell.
@snailboat Ahah)
Hi @AndrewKolenteew!
@DamkerngT. Hi!
@DamkerngT. How are you&
?*
In fact, I'm also gonna vanish for some days.
Good. Thanks! I'm browsing the main site at the moment.
@MARamezani Oh, some more exams? or a summer trip?
18:45
@Dam is gonna breathe out ta his nostrils for some moment.
Stupid auto correction.
I'm thinking about adding a couple of entries from two grammar books for Cookie Monster.
@DamkerngT. Very well, but I'll go to work. English is well, but the application must work in the future, as fast as it's possible
@DamkerngT. My exams have barely begun...Am screwed.
@AndrewKolenteew The sooner, the better. :D
@MARamezani Poor thing!
in The Periodic Table, 12 mins ago, by MARamezani
Haha, poor things.
18:48
:D
This is the cycle of life.
0
Q: What's the difference between the simple past tense and the present perfect?

user48070 The simple past tense indicates that an activity or situation began and ended at a particular time in the past. The present perfect expresses the idea that something happened (or never happened) before now, at an unspecified time in the past.The exact time it happened is not importa...

@DamkerngT. By the way the verb to think can not be used in Continuous
This question got 18k views, but only 2 votes!
@AndrewKolenteew Really?
BTW, Chem.SE graduated, and I was absent when everyone was shedding tears of victory...Heartbreaking, even for a dolt like me. :{(
18:49
@DamkerngT. Ыгку
Sure*
What's with the asterisks?
Where are you from? I'm from Ukraine
@AndrewKolenteew Are you really sure?
A use I'm not aware of?
@AndrewKolenteew Iran.
Anonymous
@AndrewKolenteew Think is typically a stative verb, so we usually use it in the present simple: "I think you're right."
Anonymous
18:51
Particularly in informal speech it is sometimes used as a dynamic verb: "I'm thinking you're right."
We can also ask someone what they're thinking, even.
@AndrewKolenteew Burn it!
Anonymous
So your rule is not true all the time, though it's true that people usually use it as a stative verb
this site is in Russian, but the list of verbs is in English
@AndrewKolenteew No link can beat the mighty @snailboat.
Anonymous
18:53
It's best to think of that as a general guideline, not a strict rule
Anonymous
Almost any stative verb can be used as a dynamic verb some of the time, but some verbs are more restricted than others
Anonymous
It's a complex topic to describe precisely, so it's often simplified
@snailboat No, no. It's a logic of English grammar. You think till the death. What do you think about in the moment?
@AndrewKolenteew I'm thinking, you're wrong.
We can not say What are you thinking about
No you think that I'm wrong
I'll try to find an English site with grammar about it
18:57
Grabs popcorn I'm thinking this is getting interesting.
@AndrewKolenteew I'm now thinking that not all of the grammar sites out there are reliable.
There are verbs which are normally not used in the Present Progressive, like:
be, believe, belong, hate, hear, like, love, mean, prefer, remain, realize, see, seem, smell, think, understand, want, wish
Especially for @AndrewKolenteew
Anonymous
@AndrewKolenteew See The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language p.167, under Dynamicity
18:59
@AndrewKolenteew BTW you can use block quotes here.
Damn that auto correction!!!!
@AndrewKolenteew I can't read Russian, but I think that page looks pretty good, though it's still incomplete. At least they got the part "not normally used" right. Can you think of a real example of, let's say, hearing?
I hear you.
No, I mean hearing, not hear.
> I'm hearing spooky sounds here...HALP!
19:05
I do it at the moment, but I don't use continuous
I hear you now
I sure what I say.
Anonymous
> Are you hearing this?
Anonymous
That's a perfectly natural English sentence in the right context.
@MARamezani some [HALP] <-- Here!
Ya know, the point is that stative verbs are usually without -ing, not always.
Do you hear this?
Anonymous
19:07
@MARamezani Or, to put it another way: stative verbs are always with -ing, but sometimes they turn into dynamic verbs :-)
Common @Andrew, English is more flexible than that!!!!!¡
I'm not even sure most of those are stative verbs.
> I'm hearing you clearly on 104.4 FM in Whitchurch, north Hampshire this morning! It's a refreshing change from the usual fare on the dial!
https://www.facebook.com/resonancefm/posts/10150622555443107
Maybe in slang we can say like this, but in classic English-grammar we can not say this
19:09
Are you native speaker?
I'm not. But snailboat is.
I'm not.
But meet @Dam and his examples anyways.
But if someone said, "I'm thinking ..." or "I'm hearing you clearly" etc. you'd be wrong if you thought what they said was wrong.
Anonymous
19:10
@AndrewKolenteew You're making the mistake of assuming the grammar you read is a correct and comprehensive description of the English language.
Anonymous
The rules you learned are "baby rules"―they're helpful at first, but they're simplifications that aren't completely accurate.
That's the hammer. ^
@Andrew be the nail.
Anonymous
That's not to say the rules are entirely false. They just don't work 100% of the time.
I'll download book soon and find this rule. I must check it))
hi all
19:11
@MARamezani I think you could be a little nicer? :-O
I am looking for a word to express how close a person to another person. For example, your best friend is very close to you. Can I say "closeness"? or any other word?
the closest.
I think it's better
@Fantasier That's an expression man...I mean Fa.
@CoKoder Hmm...closeness...Could you be more specific about the context?
Hullo BTW!
@CoKoder Closeness should work in general.
@MARamezani I want to rate how close all my friends are. For example, "closeness" of my girl friend is 100, my best friend is 90 and so on...
19:14
@MARamezani Hmm? Which expression are you talking about?
I think closeness is good enough?
@Fantasier Hammer and nails.
@snailboat I have have spent much time to learn English grammar, that's why I'm sure in my opinion. Maybe in talk native-speakers do not use all the rules in grammar.
of grammar*
@MARamezani And what was your intended meaning, exactly? I suspected it wasn't something nice?
@CoKoder This is one of the cases that I would coin something, but closeness is good.
@Fantasier It was.
Ok, thanks.
19:17
@MARamezani Really? What does it mean then? Enlighten me!
I meant for it to mean This is the bottom line which points directly at the problem you're having. Accept it, though it might be bitter.
Put plzzzs there if you want politeness and stuff.
@MARamezani :-( !
To me too.
I knew it!
Dang
I can never trust you MAR :-P
So I'll go to work)))
19:19
Yup, that's me...
A liar!
You deserve hell!
@Fantasier It feels hot!
Must be! You could try living in Thailand like me, too. Just as hot.
Is ))) the new smiley?
I think we got a question with ((( ... ))) earlier today.
I don't know. If it were, I think it would be a very weird face.
You know, let's rotate it 90 degrees clockwise and... ugh
Weird face.
Face, do you even face?
19:23
@Andrew we're pleased to announce that your face is weird.
Of course that's not what I meant!
Exxxactly.
Exxxxactly not.
I still can't find my face! Where is it? Where is it? (I remember I posted a close-up shot here. Um... I mean, Asimo's face.)
Found it!
@AndrewKolenteew Please consider keeping your mind a little more open and not sticking too much to only one book. That way you will definitely improve better and faster.
19:25
Nice selfie.
@DamkerngT. Am I the only one that thinks this is actually really spooky.
@Fantasier Good point. You're not getting a star.
@MARamezani I didn't expect one anyway. Don't confuse me with yourself :-P
19:26
@Fantasier That's @Dam before planning doomsday with Jim.
@MARamezani Who's this Jim? You?
keeps planning...
I knew it! You're the mastermind behind every single catastrophe on earth.
@Fantasier Akh I meant Jimbie.
@Fantasier I haven't seen Jim for a while. He must be busy.
19:27
He's busy crying.
Oh, right.
@MARamezani Or playing with cats and dogs. :P
I don't see him very often :-) (Or maybe the other way round)
I wonder how many people on ELL with some rep actually don't have grammar as their top tag.
19:30
@MARamezani It appears to be a prerequisite of some sort. :D
I seem to recall that at one point snailboat mentioned ELL was like a morphosyntax Q&A site.
1
Q: "How is this called" Vs "What is this called"?

Dory Which of the following is more suitable as a title for a picture with aמ arrow toward a part of body's anatomy? How is this called? What is this called"? I need for a picture of a part of the body, that appears without information about this part. So, I need to ask what it is in the...

11
Q: This site isn't English Morphosyntax Learners

snailboatQuestions about English should be allowed on ELL. We don't need to restrict our topicality to an arbitrary subset of questions, like those about morphosyntax ("grammar"). In particular, questions about semantics and pragmatics ("meaning") should obviously be on-topic, given that they're major...

Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Cute!
@snailboat Hee
19:32
She mentions lots of things.
Just like they.
My god.
You have a god in your possession. My GOD [ironic] you must be RICH!
Anonymous
My top tag is grammar by a huge margin
She could've said grammar instead of morphosyntax...
Typical @snailboat.
19:36
But for some people they're not the same thing.
:-)
Grammar is ambiguous.
@snailboat You mean morphosyntax?
Anonymous
I try to say morphosyntax when I mean morphosyntax
Anonymous
I may not always succeed :-)
Don't worry. Failure brings success.
Keep failing.
®
I meant
@MARamezani I wonder if you could say that about the exams you just finished.
:-)
I'm addicted to typing :-) now.
19:38
I wonder too.
So much influence from this chat.
@MARamezani A quote that could be useful in your exams: "When all else fails, ... we don't."
:P
Only my pen is useful to me in the exams.
That sentence is usually a lie.
So we could actually take your brain and heart out and you would still be fine?
That scene would be so cool, but maybe a little graphic.
19:40
Well not a little.
I'm a chair cyclohexane. We ain't got no heart and that jazz
Let's just say, "a lot." :-)
A lot!
I said it! I said it!
Anonymous
@Fantasier I'm sorry! :-)
Where's my money?
19:41
No, he told us to say "a lot," not "A lot!" like that!
@snailboat Don't. I'm perfectly fine with it :-)
Pishhhh.
@Fantasier I'm sorry to say that this is stage two of addiction.
Trust me.
@MARamezani You lost your wallet again? How many times do I have to tell you to keep it in your bag?
I dun research on it.
Oh, you muast [sic] be an expert on this thing then.
@Fantasier How many times? Oh lord!
19:44
@MARamezani Like, a zillion times maybe.
Hullo @SanŚ́́́́Ý́́́́Ś́́́́! Welcome!
@Fantasier You were so loud saying it I didn't hear you.
Hullo @FarArrow!
@MARamezani Are you trying to be poetic? Because I just spotted a paradox.
(Or was it an oxymoron? I'm so terrible at lit)
0
A: "How is this called" Vs "What is this called"?

FumbleFingersOP's version #1 (using how instead of what is [something] called?) is a typical non-native speaker error. If you compare Google's results for how what called site-specific to ELL and again for site-specific to ELU, you'll see the error often occurs in actual question titles from non-native speake...

(But I'm in a faculty that's focused on studying lit! What am I doing here!??)
Wow, 19,700 results on ELU!
5,870 results on ELL.
user116848
19:46
@MARamezani Hello MA!
Hmm... Latin is surprisingly fun.
A lot of inflections but I'm studying it bit by bit, so I should be fine at this pace...
@Fantasier Like dead fun? (in more than one sense :-)
@DamkerngT. In both senses I guess. :-P Time will tell
The thing I really love about Latin is probably the fact that it has no articles. Yay.
XxßVIIñ
user116848
Galician detected,
Anonymous
19:54
@Fantasier Japanese too! :-)
Anonymous
Japanese has lots of inflection, too.
Anonymous
Though it's not exactly the same thing
I still doubt if the absence of the after as in Cookie Monster's question is really about the law (or legal writing).
I think I'll keep Japanese for later. I've seen my friends at uni studying Japanese... Difficult enough :P (Mainly because they need to remember a lot of Kanjis for tests I think)
I mean, they don't usually complain about grammar or something like that. Only kanji.
πΔπß
19:56
@Fantasier Maybe the Japanese dorama help them a lot. ;-)
Oh, probably the anime and manga too.
That's a surprise. I thought drama in Japanese would be durama.
Instead it's do!
Oh, that reminds me, another thing my friends hate is loanwords written in Katakana.
Hah! I kinda like it.
You see, Mr. Roboto always speaks in katakana.
(or so I was told)
Τηισ ισ Γλεεκ
@MARamezani Is that Latin?
Anonymous
@Fantasier The typical epenthetic vowel in Japanese is /u/. The biggest exception is following /t/ and /d/, in which case it's /o/
19:59
One of my friends once spent a lot of time trying to figure out the meaning of アスファルト.
LOL -- Google Translate says: Tiis currency Gleek

« first day (27 days earlier)      last day (471 days later) »