« first day (20 days earlier)      last day (478 days later) » 

12:07
hola
Hullo!
There! Stopping @Frd from getting alones since 1955.
Anonymous
@MARamezani Tanx!
12:09
Your wellcome.
Anonymous
Dang, I've lost 90 rep to the rep cap today so far!
-90!!!!
@snailboat You can spend some on a bounty. ;-)
@snailboat Hmm...On Japanese.SE?
Or ELL?
Oh, it's ELL.
I wanna go and downvote some of @snailboat's thingies now.
<-- still can't figure out what Garrison Keillor and Robert Frost have in common...
Anyway, Garrison Keillor is awesome!
12:18
Yakh!
I just ate a bitter pistachio thingy.
Oh, no!
Bitter pistachio... hmm...
Thanks. I am so sorry as I made some mistake and typos. — nima 2 hours ago
I think I know what troubles Nima in studying English.
listening!
He's studying English as if he's studying history.
still wondering about bitter pistachios... Is that even possible?...
@MARamezani Oh, tell me more!
12:21
@DamkerngT. That's more possible than your age count.
@MARamezani LOL
@DamkerngT. Imagine when someone says: Oh @Dam you got that typo there. What would be your response?
@MARamezani Thanks! -- perhaps.
Nah, give me a sentence.
What is bitter pistachios??
12:23
I think I just wrote a real one this morning.
@pazzo Nice catch! In case you spot an error like this of mine again (which is pretty likely, imo), please feel free to edit the post as you see fit. Thank you in advance, and thanks again for this catch! — Damkerng T. 21 hours ago
Real enough?
:D
To whom it may concern @Fred @Dam: google.com/… The pistachios are more real than your nightmare @Fred.
@DamkerngT. And then take a look at Nima's response. ROBOTIC.
As in a bad way.
Not @Dam way.
Ahh... I see your point!
You see, he studies: as can be used in the place of because. Then he applies what he read to a sentence, as if he's putting squares in their places. (Am referring to that children game)
There's no feeling.
No flexibility.
No nothing.
I think you're right.
This isn't the way to study a language.
12:29
I think it's about the amount of input.
Simply because, the speakers of that language, who are the people we solely want to be able to talk like, are humans, not robots.
No offence there @Dam.
Some taken.
You're not just a robot.
So you don't get what chemicals refer to when they say robot.
12:30
Well, whaddayou want?
Whadju want?
Whaddoyou want?
Whaddya want?
Hides from @snailboat
If we assume that, say, nima has zero contact with native speakers and materials, I think he's doing quite okay.
I don't know how much of the Internet he can access.
Anonymous
Anonymous
12:38
@MARamezani Are you saying you don't want to talk like Dr Sbaitso?
A robo-doctor!
Who the heck is that?
I can't see youtube.
Anonymous
Darn
Boing!
@MARamezani I know the way by which you can use youtube there! :-)
12:46
There's discussion of verb licensing, with further links, here. You may also check out question on the licensing tag. — StoneyB May 22 '14 at 15:06
Where are all the questions?
Anonymous
Is this a trick question?
Anonymous
Are you on the unanswered tab?
Anonymous
Maybe the featured tab?
Oh, I think I was on the featured tab!
Thanks!
@DamkerngT. No, the questions were hiding from your mighty fingers.
Anonymous
12:50
It took me a second to figure it out :-)
@snailboat I guess it could take me days. :-)
13:10
2
A: the Unified Modeling Language vs. Unified Modeling Language

J.R.It's odd, but if I were to say this with the full words, I would say, "One of the most popular tools is the Unified Modeling Language" (and include the article). However, if I were to use the acronym, I'd probably say, "One of the most popular tools is UML" (not "the UML"). A similar phenomenon...

Interesting!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Maybe sometimes we think of "Unified Modeling Language" as an expansion of UML
Anonymous
And sometimes we think of it syntactically as the language for unified modeling
@DamkerngT. Articles are always interesting.
Anonymous
Especially articles about articles.
13:15
Yeah...
@snailboat That's pretty much like my guess!
7 hours ago, by Damkerng T.
I think the writer might be thinking of it like the Spanish language (so the) and Spanish (so no the).
^That thinking is probably not really kosher.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Looks okay to me
Exactly what I thought. Way to go @Dam.
@MARamezani Hehe!
13:20
@DamkerngT. Have you changed religion? You're using lots of Kosher lately. Or is there Kosher in Buddhism?
Anonymous
I think he got it from me.
@snailboat I haven't finished Leech's yet. His "progressive" discussion is really interesting.
Anonymous
I'm a bad influence like that :-)
He's recently absorbing a lot of things.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. By the way, I should point out sometime that you use 's forms when I don't expect them
13:21
@MARamezani I take it as "okay" or "not wrong".
Anonymous
I know it means "Leech's book"
Anonymous
But it sounds a little strange in this case
0
Q: How is "goes" pronounced?

user19492When i was younger, my teacher said the word 'goes' must be pronounced go with an -s sound. But a couple of days ago, my teacher fixed me about that and told me i must pronounce 'goes' the same way we say 'does'. So which one is correct? Thank you!

The first thing I thought: AmE or BrE?
Anonymous
Doesn't really matter
Why not?
13:22
@snailboat nods -- I guess it could make it sound like it's a place, or Leech wrote only one book.
@MARamezani goes doesn't rhyme with does in any dialects I know.
Anonymous
@MARamezani Because dictionaries answer the question completely in both cases
@DamkerngT. Yeah...
Anonymous
And yeah
But the question in the title doesn't mention anything about does.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, it's more like
Anonymous
13:24
@MARamezani Dictionaries still answer it completely, so it's off-topic
Yes. Let's go VTC!
Anonymous
> I've read Pullum's book, but I haven't finished Leech's book yet.
Anonymous
@MARamezani I did before you linked to it
Anonymous
In this example, context licenses ellipsis
@snailboat I see a close(1) next to it...Yes.
Anonymous
13:25
So it's fine.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. But when you said Leech's earlier, there was no context to license it
Anonymous
So it didn't have an antecedent
Anonymous
But it has to have one, so the reader thinks "Leech's what?" :-)
I see. So ellipsis without bringing in the antecedent causes confusion and ambiguity. I should avoid it.
@snailboat Even when I know that you know it's a book?
Anonymous
13:27
@DamkerngT. Yeah, even though I could figure it out from prior knowledge, it was weird.
Anonymous
It wasn't part of the discourse
Anonymous
So it didn't prevent understanding, but it was unnatural
I see. Thanks!
I'm all about unnatural.
Anonymous
13:28
@MARamezani Hey, was that sarcasm? :-)
Yes. < That's sarcasm too.
Anonymous
In any case, the dictionary will do a better job of answering than ELL
I guess it's irony. :-)
Anonymous
That's why I linked to it and voted to close
@DamkerngT. I love transition metals.
Anonymous
13:29
It has IPA transcriptions of both AmE and BrE pronunciations, and clickable links that let you listen to audio
Anonymous
ELL is not meant to reproduce a dictionary
Anonymous
It is, in fact, not as good because we can't easily embed audio, because we have people who make up ad hoc transcriptions, etc.
About that question, I think it's either that their teacher got it wrong or they had a miscommunication.
Anonymous
Also, the question is unclear
1
Q: 'meaning' vs 'semantics'

Law Area 51 Proposal - CommitThis question respects the noun 'semantics' and duplicates NOT this on the adjective 'semantic'. What are the similarities and differences : 'meaning' vs 'semantics'? ELU didn't simplify enough. semantics     {plural noun}   {usually treated as singular} [OED] 2. a. = The branch of li...

Reopen?
Anonymous
13:30
(What does it mean for it to be pronounced like "does"? Are they talking about the vowel? But they just mentioned an 's' sound, which neither word has. Hmm...?)
Anonymous
@MARamezani They don't need to ask the difference between meaning and meaning in two separate questions,
Anonymous
One is unclear enough
@snailboat I also think the two "my teacher"s are two different teachers!
So it's a no-no.
@MARamezani I can see that they asked different questions...
13:32
And both are weird.
though I'm not sure if the questions fit ELL well.
Anonymous
I don't really think they're different enough to be asked separately
Anonymous
I think Law Area is under the impression that the adjective semantic and the noun semantics refer to wildly different things
Anonymous
But that is not actually the case
13:34
@snailboat @snailboat!
I have a question in better English than you can imagine!
You need to learn some things from this guy:
-22
Q: I don’t know what the purpose of stack overflow

NiventhFirst of all apologies to all. I don’t know what the purpose of stack overflow. I thought stack overflow is used discourage and teased the beginner level developers. I asked a question on your website, your higher level members closed the question. He does not understand what I am asking to your...

@snailboat I think they also think the same for semantic semantic and semantic meaning meaning.
Anonymous
@MARamezani Ah, thank you very much for the link
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, my head...
@snailboat Welcome.
@snailboat :D
13:36
7 hours ago, by Freddy
-22
Q: I don’t know what the purpose of stack overflow

NiventhFirst of all apologies to all. I don’t know what the purpose of stack overflow. I thought stack overflow is used discourage and teased the beginner level developers. I asked a question on your website, your higher level members closed the question. He does not understand what I am asking to your...

Hey, Freddy's got a new look!
Anonymous
Freddy's a trend setter
Anonymous
MARamezani used to be, back in the hullo days
@Freddy Is that the real you?
@DamkerngT. I think he was sad when I said...
13:37
@DamkerngT. yup
1 hour ago, by MARamezani
To whom it may concern @Fred @Dam: https://www.google.com/search?q=Garrison+Keillor&rlz=1C1PRFE_enIR614IR614&oq=Gar‌​rison+Keillor&aqs=chrome..69i57.292j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#q=bitt‌​er+pistachios The pistachios are more real than your nightmare @Fred.
@Freddy Nice to meet you!
Anonymous
I like the new avatar better :-)
@MARamezani Nope not at all
Anonymous
I don't like seeing horror movie stuff
13:37
@MARamezani LOL
Anonymous
0
A: Could all "auxiliary" be used at the beginning of the sentence

A PersonThe auxiliaries in this example are at the beginning of these sentences because the subject pronouns that would usually go before them have been omitted. (I) Haven't had a windows box in a while. If you're asking whether it's correct to omit subject pronouns, no, it usually isn't. It can so...

@snailboat Thanks
Anonymous
> Also, the correct contraction of "will not" is "won't".
@Freddy I can't do what you're doing in the photo!
Anonymous
I didn't even notice the OP wrote willn't
13:39
Practice makes man perfect @DamkerngT.
@snailboat Oh, I think I'd recommend them to avoid it, but I know that they'd use it anyway. :-)
woman too
@Freddy Hehe!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Hey, maybe non-native speakers will be the driving force behind the regularization of will.
Anonymous
Insomuch as an auxiliary can be regularized
13:41
How about shalln't, amn't? :-)
Anonymous
Yeah, be is by far the least regular verb in English
Anonymous
You know how go and wend form a single paradigm? go, went, but no *goed or *wend? That suppletion stuff I was talking about.
Anonymous
What you know as be is actually made up of three different verbs
Anonymous
That's why all the forms look so different
Anonymous
Of course, that's just etymology. It's just one verb now.
Anonymous
13:42
It has more forms than any verb.
Anonymous
And such ridiculousness as:
Anonymous
> Aren't I adorable?
> *I aren't adorable.
nods
@snailboat What's the third word, besides "bee" and "bean"? :P
Anonymous
We need to get the regularization team working on it!
Anonymous
Hehe, silly!
13:46
@snailboat If only we can trap 1.21 gigawatts, we can check out how English is like 100 years from now!
^maybe what'd sound better.
Anonymous
Yeah, what would sound better
Anonymous
> If only we could trap 1.21 gigawatts, we could check out what English will be like 100 years from now!
Anonymous
I had to sit and think about will be versus would be for a while :-)
Anonymous
I'm still not sure!
@snailboat Oh, I think the film makes me think it's more real than it could be. :-)
Anonymous
13:49
I'm not sure you can say "If only we can [...]", though I'm not sure you can't, either. Maybe you can.
Anonymous
But I expect:
Anonymous
> If we can only ...
> If only we could ...
Anonymous
Not sure why I expect those word orders.
Anonymous
> If we can just ...
I think I'm now prefer:
> If only we could trap 1.21 gigawatts, we could check out what English is like 100 years from now!
Anonymous
13:51
I still like what better :-)
Oh, I missed that one.
Anonymous
But yeah, I'll go with your is
I think if we had a time machine, we could think of all possible time like a map.
Hmm... but it'd be a map that I'd still like to say was like 100 years ago.
Hah! I see. It's the English two-tense map! :P
Anonymous
Complicated one, that.
Aww... I thought it would be natural for English speakers.
@snailboat "Generally, if you omit pronouns, people will have a hard time understanding what you're trying to say. It's best to include them, as pronouns really aren't optional." -- Hmm... Really?
Anyway, typing and speaking aren't exactly the same. We can speak much faster than we can type.
> Can use Documents, Video etc...just not in the top folder.
To add I will mean three extra keystrokes: shift, i, space
(But they had to press shift to type Can anyway, assuming that it wasn't a smartphone keyboard.)
> Overall, thinner the film, shorter was the width.
https://ell.stackexchange.com/q/56326/3281
Hmm...
What kind of film is that?
Why would the width become shorter?
Anonymous
14:05
@DamkerngT. I know that was rhetorical, but no, not really
Anonymous
Pronouns are not strictly necessary 100% of the time
Anonymous
They are quite often necessary
Anonymous
Conversational deletion has come up before
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. The first time my mom wrote email to me, she left out all her sentence-initial pronouns
14:07
@snailboat I guess we have a similar question somewhere on the main site.
Anonymous
It struck me as kind of strange
@snailboat Oh!
Anonymous
I believe it's some sort of letter-writing practice
Anonymous
I think that probably needs to be accounted for separately from conversational deletion
Anonymous
Though I'm not entirely sure, to be honest
14:08
nods
Anonymous
Anyway, it's something some people do.
Anonymous
My first impression of the text the OP quoted was that it was probably a non-native speaker
Anonymous
But then I changed my mind
I thought it could be a native speaker in a rush.
Anonymous
I think I thought that because "Cant put anything in user folder?" looks like a strange first sentence
Anonymous
14:10
But I think it was intended as a subject line for a forum post, or some such
Anonymous
And we just don't know that because the OP didn't tell us
It looks like an echo question to me.
Anonymous
Seems unlikely
Hmm... I guess it's a reply to someone saying "I can't put anything in my user folder. Help!"
Anonymous
If only because the sentence it echoes would have to be ungrammatical
Anonymous
14:13
It looks more like a subject line, since people leave out articles and such in those, like in headlinese
Anonymous
Yep, looks like I was right: eightforums.com/general-support/…
Anonymous
I should've just searched for it in the first place :-)
That's a weird title!
Anonymous
Well, it makes sense to me as a title, but not as a sentence
(I )can(')t put anything in (the )user folder(. What should I do)?
Anonymous
14:16
That's how I was able to figure out it was a title :-)
Anonymous
Or, if I may be permitted to stretch it a little: [I] can't put anything in [my] user folder? [What's up with that? Halp!]
Hehe!
Oh, we can make it front-heavy ellipsis!
> (I can't believe I) can't put anything in (the) user folder?
Anonymous
Hah!
Anonymous
Of course, that form of ellipsis doesn't exist in English
Anonymous
14:19
But sure, why not? :-)
Anonymous
I like adding words to stuff.
Anonymous
As you can see from my version.
Anonymous
[Halp!]
14:55
Language used in my book sucks!
"cancer of blood"
lol
one more "car for race"
user116848
Hi guys
@Arrowfar hola
long time!
user116848
Aloha @Freddy!
user116848
Yeah I visit here sometimes.
How is your day going?
user116848
15:04
Hello @snailboat!
user116848
@Freddy It is going okay. Just the routine stuff going on. How is yours?
till now good :D
user116848
user116848
@Freddy Good! :-)
noodles reminds me of maggie
user116848
15:09
Here we eat maggie too.
user116848
It is good. But it seems a bit plain to me. Do you like it?
BTW I like Biryani more than maggie
user116848
Same here. Biryani rocks!
I think we both are from India
user116848
I'm from Pakistan.
user116848
15:10
But dishes are pretty same :-)
yup
15:21
@Catija HOLA
 
3 hours later…
17:53
Someone got this msg from an official.But he is not sure whether he can obtain three certificates from any one of the four authorities? Or he have to get it from any three of these four authorities?
> you should bring three satisfactory character certificate either from:
1)head of the college
2)gazette officer/bank officer
3)present employer
4)person who is not related to the candidate
Form the sentence does it make clear? I think as far as the sentence goes, it can be either three certificates from one or three certificates from each one out of the four mentioned authorities.
 
2 hours later…
20:12
Hallo!
20:38
Hello!
@MARamezani Are you from Iran or Italy?
@Iplodman Hello
@snailboat Hello Veh!
I am alone :(
See you all later!
Bye!
20:54
@Man_From_India It's not very clear to me, but if I remember correctly, the common practice is you get three letters, each from any of the four. (So, it's possible that all letters are of type 4.)
Good evening, @Iplodman!
Evening!
How are you?
Not in my perfect shape, but good enough. :-)
How are you?
Good thanks!
Wrestling with LaTeX :)
Haha! That sounds like fun!
Well, kinda' c:
I'm about to make a nice title macro.
21:03
:D
@DamkerngT. You there?
Hello!
Hello!
New bug:
in Mos Eisley, 3 mins ago, by Lamart
Unstar as interesting
@DamkerngT. Though it looks stupid.
21:14
:D -- I think it's been like that for so long.
:)
But its incorrect english right? @DamkerngT.
I'd say it could use an edit. :-)
So shall I go back to Meta.SE for this? Its gonna be scary
Um... it's up to you!
@DamkerngT. Just posting it in their chat room. Safe
21:20
For one thing, it succeeds in communicating, which is probably the most important thing.
@Lamart :D
21:39
@DamkerngT. Made a mistake by posting it there. :(
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 4 mins ago, by Lamart
@tchrist I am sorry to have it posted here. Actually, I was even scared to do so.
21:56
@Lamart It's debatable, though we could debate on something else too. ;-)
Pointless message ;p
@Iplodman Oh, no! What was it?
I was wondering about toeing the line in an entry I'm writing. I'm not sure if it's a bit iffy.
But it's your writing, isn't it? :-)
Thanks, if I read that right :)
I meant ethically :P
> (On politics:) I've been brainwashed to care about something I can't yet participate in, like war, or legalization of marijuana.
22:12
Hmm... I read your toeing the line as an idiom. Now I'm thinking maybe you used it literally. :-)
:)
I'm just not sure if it's appropriate.
@Iplodman That sounds fair.
Ah, good :)
22:53
Moin
Hullo @Choko!
23:23
> Which would you prefer? (Let's say it's a discussion on two sentences or two words.)
a) Their meaning is the same.
b) Their meanings are the same.
B :)
A-ha! Thanks!
No problem!

« first day (20 days earlier)      last day (478 days later) »