« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (482 days later) » 

00:08
Hi
Yes, I read that!
But now I am not satisfied with it. Because I can't tell if the singer is singing Whaddya waiting for? or WhaTTaya waiting for?
She's English, so its possible she's keeping the T...
Here is my analysis.
32 mins ago, by Damkerng T.
I think she meant to sing "waddar you waiting for", but a) her /r/ is basically not there in this one (/r/ is there in other occurrences of "What're you waiting for?" in the song); b) she rounds her lips before /y/ in "you" and this co-occurs with the schwa of "dar". Results? This "waddar" of hers sounds like "waddo", as our OP's heard. (I think this is also related to our case that Jim heard my "neural" as "neuro".)
I think she was trying to blend American /r/ into her vocalization.
00:12
hmmm. very interesting analysis.
!
Did you put it as an answer yet?
No, I saw yours, and I'm satisfied. :-)
Hmmm... maybe I should concentrate on her lip-rounding more? :)
Hehe!
It's hard to imagine how she actually vocalized it. I mean, we can't see her lips when she was recording the song.
Yeah but what do you hear?
I've listened so much I am hearing what I want to hear...
I heard as I mentioned in my analysis.
This one at 1:17 is the most ambiguous one, imho.
Other "What're you waiting for?" of hers are easier to catch.
00:17
yeah it was that instance, I was listening with the song in the background and suddenly thought, wait she just sang "WhaTTayou"
nods -- That's what I heard too. Something more like a schwa which sounds a bit like the "o" vowel of "do".
So I repeated it, and came up with my analysis (why this "d"+schwa sounds like "do").
Maybe I can try listening to her song with my headphones (which allow me to pick up more subtleties)...
On my headphones, I can hear her /r/ of "waddar you waiding for", but it's so subtle.
Is it even possible to say WhaTTa(r)you? ... Of course, I ask that as an American, who would not pronounce that with a T :)
Oh, I see. I think she wanted to make a flap-t.
I imagine her tongue glides quickly from [ɾ] to [ə] to [ɹ] to [j].
([ɾ] = flap-t)
Because the time is too short in that verse, I think she had to squeeze everything, so [ɹ] is hardly there, and [j] partially coalesces with [ə].
00:33
yeah I am with you there, that stuff all ellides
Maybe if that verse was longer by a few milliseconds, we would be able to hear the [ɹ] more clearly. :-)
nods
I still haven't watched that movie. :D
ah, me neither; ive no interest
Oh! I have. :P
It made a buzz at Oscars anyway. :D
<-- rarely watches the Oscars
Understood!
00:45
Oh is @Jim Reynolds here or not?
His avatar is here, but I think he's not here.
Perhaps not until a few hours later.
He's in Taiwan?
He's an American in Taiwan.
Like an American in Paris...
Hehe!
Indeed!
00:47
And you are in Thailand?
Yes, I'm Thai.
I thought I remembered correctly. I guess I'm going to listen to the song in my headphones, FWIW....
nods
Does "Ago December it snowed forty four inches in Buffalo" in your profile means that you're in Buffalo?
Oh, Austin. I watch concerts from Austin on WPR sometimes.
Umm... I mean WPT (video.wpt.org).
Gotta go. See you later. Bye!
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
02:56
@DamkerngT. Hmm, it's ungrammatical, but I think it's supposed to be an example of English rather than something directly related to the user
Anonymous
03:44
Anonymous
This is my new snail! :-)
Aww!
Looks like a levitating snail. :-)
I am not very sure, but I think from is a good option, and I think using through there is not correct. — Man_From_India 12 hours ago
I guess that Man_From_India must've thought that it's not about money saving tips, but it's the tip money itself! (I thought that myself, too. Is Alex a waiter?)
@snailboat Oh, I forgot to ask: What's the name of this little one?
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I'm still not sure! Maybe Pliny :-)
Oh, nice name!
What does it mean?
Anonymous
Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23 – August 25, AD 79), better known as Pliny the Elder (/ˈplɪni/), was a Roman author, naturalist, and natural philosopher, as well as naval and army commander of the early Roman Empire, and personal friend of the emperor Vespasian. Spending most of his spare time studying, writing or investigating natural and geographic phenomena in the field, he wrote an encyclopedic work, Naturalis Historia, which became a model for all other encyclopedias. Pliny the Younger, his nephew, wrote of him in a letter to the historian Tacitus: For my part I deem those blessed to whom,...
03:51
Ahh
Oh, I pronounced the name wrong!
Anonymous
04:07
@DamkerngT. There's another common garden snail called the Roman snail
Anonymous
They aren't common around here though
What do they look like, these Roman snails?
Hmm... (got some pictures on Google)
Anonymous
Fairly similar! :-)
Anonymous
Anonymous
That's from Wikipedia
Anonymous
04:09
They have the same general shape but they're a little bigger and their coloring and such is different
I thought they might've carried the Eagle or something. :P
Anonymous
You know, giant snails are a common motif in fantasy artwork
Anonymous
I don't know if I've seen any snails carrying eagles
I found this in my Roman snail search results:
@snailboat Roman ones, probably. :P
Anonymous
04:13
@DamkerngT. Oh, wow :-)
@snailboat Gigantic snails!
Loch Snail!
0
Q: 'except if' vs 'if not'

Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit [ODO:] unless {conjunction} = Except if (used to introduce the case in which a statement being made is not true or valid) Source: p 139, Introduction to Logic (2 ed, 2010) by Harry J. Gensler (see Linguistics or ELU) “Unless” is also equivalent to “if not”... 1. The above two defini...

Oh, no! (I feel sorry for LawA51PC that they couldn't get it intuitively.)
Anonymous
04:49
I don't think the approach Law Area is taking to language is especially productive
Anonymous
But to each their own, I suppose
Anonymous
0
Q: Fall/Come Under Investigation

meatieI have a question about "come under" and "fall under". These: He came under suspicion for fraud. He fell under suspicion for fraud. are standard English. Could I then write these: He came under investigation for fraud. He fell under investigation for fraud....

Anonymous
I guess investigations don't loom over stuff like suspicion does!
Anonymous
But we do say under investigation, so it's a reasonable question
Anonymous
I don't really have an explanation, I guess
Anonymous
04:58
(I'm sure someone else can write one, though :-)
Anonymous
05:18
Hey, contrary to my intuition, there are corpus results for come under investigation!
Anonymous
Of course, they're much less common.
Anonymous
> He had come under investigation by postal and legal authorities as early as February, but they appeared to be making little progress in their efforts.
Anonymous
I wonder if that's a blend of be under investigation and come under suspicion like the one meatie is making
Anonymous
It sounds strange to me
Anonymous
I think under investigation is typically a predicative complement, most commonly as a complement of be but with other verbs as well
Anonymous
05:23
Hmm, be under investigation is fine, but become under investigation is strange
Anonymous
Maybe because it's something people actively do? was placed under investigation
Anonymous
Ahh, I can't explain any of this. :-)
Anonymous
Well, that's okay.
05:57
@snailboat Come (to be placed under) investigation.
Or come into the spotlight (?)
Anonymous
Snails are fun to watch
Anonymous
It's very relaxing
Anonymous
They take their time :-)
Anonymous
The little one is surprisingly fast, though.
Anonymous
I've already forgotten about that came under investigation stuff.
Anonymous
06:16
Snails have come into the spotlight :-)
Anonymous
1
Q: How to intuit 'unless'?

Law Area 51 Proposal - CommitI already know, and so ask NOT about, the meanings or proofs of: A unless B = A, except if B = A if not B = Either A or B. I ask only for intuition; do NOT prove formally or use truth tables. My problem: I want to avoid memorisation. So whenever I see unless, I always need to pause for 5 mi...

Anonymous
Hmm, I don't think doing extra analysis is the solution to that problem
Anonymous
I think Law Area just needs to practice
Anonymous
Until it becomes natural and not something that requires thought
10:11
Hi!
@user62015 Hola
I want to ask you one question.
When you use 'etc' we always use '.' right?
yes
So after the '.' we should use the capital letter?
"." is used because it is short form of "et cetera"
it is not used as full stop
10:15
So we should use a small letter?
Yes if it is not last word of sentence
Okay.
I understood thanks.
your welcome :)
 
1 hour later…
11:39
etc.
 
2 hours later…
13:17
Wow! It's really deserted here!
yup
hola
Hullo!
@MARamezani Due you like programing?
Depends.
On what
13:24
On depending.
depending on what
It's, in short, depending on the depending on the dependence of the dependent independence of ...
oh cool :)
your dependence on depending is cool if dependence of your depending is independent of dependence
This phenomenon is referred to as dependensificationicizationiticizationificationism.
@DamkerngT. CONTEXT!
I think she says the pin though.
and study of this phenomenon is called dependensificationicizationiticizationificationising
13:32
We're getting to great depths.
Yes soon there will articles on this room's achievement. We will be famous all over the world.
Aren't we already?
I thought there was a film about us.
Namely, Hotel Do|tivania.
not that way. We will be famous for our contribution to English language
English is already thanking us.
BTW @Fred have you studied organochem?
Now whole world will thank us
nope
13:40
What about in school?
We have organic not organo. I think they are different, isn't it?
Organochem is the IUPAC name for organic chemistry.
Sheeeeeeeeeeesh.
Ohh okay thanks for sharing secret
Yup i do learn that
How deep have you gone?
Do you study reaction mechanisms?
Yes but basics, like markonikov and aniti-markonikov. I think we will have it in more detail this semester.
13:45
Hmm.
Do you study IUPAC nomenclature?
yes
OK OK.
What exactly are the topics you study?
Name them.
5 pts.
Solutions(currently learning), electrochemistry, organic, solid state, p block(most boring)
wbu?
Oh, in 10th we have 1) Atomic theory 2) Periodic trends 3) Ionic compounds 4) Covalent compounds 5) Organochem
@Freddy What topics do you study in organochem?
Haloalkane and haloarene compounds, alcohol, Phenol and ether compound. 2 different chapters for all this, i will learn this semester.
13:52
Halorene?
You mean alkenyl halides?
@Freddy This semester you're talking about = 11th?
12th
11th is over
O.O
I'm having my 10th over.
haloarene is Aryl halide
it is aromatic compounds don't know much more
Haloarene! You typoed back there...
yes you are year younger
yes I did
13:55
@Freddy You're gonna study haloarenes in this semester?
yes a whole chapter on it
You're screwed.
you have very good syllabus. Actually your 10th stuff i had learned in 11th
solid state...Tell me more about it.
You study Bravais lattices?
@Freddy [Emoticon for bragging]
emoticon
Solid state on chemistry point of view. Different crystalline structure, arrangements, semiconductors and much more
@JimReynolds hola
@MARamezani What you meant by "you are screwed"?
14:02
@Freddy It means you're dead. Slanguage.
I mean why?
Because you'll be studying aromatic + reaction mechanism.
@Freddy Hmm...
Oh, BTW I've studied the books for 11th and the 12th grade.
I know but it will be easier because i will only have MCQ's.
I mean our 11th and 12th, of course.
@Freddy Em Cee what?
multiple choice question
14:05
Oh!
Is there different blocks(s p d f) in 11th and 12th?
In our 11th, we'll be hit with 1)Stoichiometry: A little more advanced 2) Thermochemistry 3) Solutions and colligative properties.
Not much organochem.
:(
Theremo is my favourite is physical chemistry
Orgo is best because you only need to understand least mugging up
In our 12th, we have to deal with 1) Kinetics 2) Chemical Equilibrium 3) Acid & Bases: Different theories and 4) Redox
Okay equilibrium is also good to many numerical problems.
14:08
@Freddy Figures out, many students love high school thermodynamics because it doesn't get scary.
I mean,
many students that actually like some part of their lesson.
I pretty much guess @Fred you haven't seen the aggressive part of thermochem.
Hullo @Jim!
I am glad there is no periodic table. You are lucky
nope only 3 laws
@Freddy There is.
@Freddy And a hell comes outta those three laws.
Or rather, breaks loose.
that chapter will screw you trust me
@Freddy There is atomic theory and periodic trends.
10th.
What is it about periodic table that you study?
Different blocks one by one in detail
14:12
Tell me some details about those details.
uses, chemical properties, physical properties, trends, exceptions, allotropes :')
of each group
S*it!
Somehow looks like our periodic trends, but worse.
Yes
I need to go
bye
We study trends and exceptions and chemical properties.
TTYL!
@Jim now you can talk.
The scary part of the speech disappears.
 
1 hour later…
15:40
@MARamezani Well, you're right!
@DamkerngT. I'm always right!
Hullo!
Hullo!
How have you been doing?
15:41
I've been doing great!
Chat's been lonely without you posting random questions.
How was your exam?
@MARamezani Aww
@DamkerngT. What exam?
Bio?
You mentioned something 400 pages.
That was math, yesterday.
It was biology today morning.
15:42
Oh, so it's the exam season? :-)
I somehow thought I already typed was there
@DamkerngT. Just before the exam season.
@MARamezani It could've happened to anyone.
@MARamezani Oh, so the math yesterday and biology today don't count?
Our school is basically killing us with exam preparations that are worse than the exams themselves.
15:44
Apparently, you've survived the prep, so far.
Noticed that Study.English.Well's account exists no more.
Oh, no!
@DamkerngT. Well, I wouldn't call it surviving...
But I'll hit a 95 in math and 90-95 in bio.
Not too much for a nerd.
Their questions are actually interesting, even though a bit localized.
@MARamezani That's near perfect!
I scored a measly 92.5 in chemistry.
:(
15:47
Umm... are you sure that's measly?
But all my mistakes were arbitrary stupid thingies...If we can actually call them mistakes.
Like I did the comma in naming organic compounds in the IUPAC way the English way around.
@DamkerngT. I'm the chemistry god of our school, and our school is among the ten top schools in Iran.
So, 92.5 is very "measly".
Aww...
[Emoticon for bragging even when I fail]
Answered an ELL question today.
15:49
I guess sometimes it happens to everyone in tests. To be human is to err.
And a chemistry question.
@MARamezani Yay!
@DamkerngT. I'm not a human.
My chemistry answer is rather...Well, I personally love it!
> ...provided by Sidgwick...
15:51
@MARamezani Thallium says, Thank you!
This is too awesome to be the wording of a student.
@DamkerngT. Meh...I got the answer with Google searches and understanding a Wikipedia article.
Yeah, but I think the "why" part is yours.
The ELL answer is about conjunctive adverbs...Woo I'd forgotten that cool name.
At least you after reading the article.
@DamkerngT. We can say that...
Ahh...The random downvote striker back at chemistry is back!
15:56
Oh!
Someone's been randomly downvoting a lot of high rep users in chemistry.
Hullo @Catija!
I see you recently have been active on ELL!
Hmm... lemme think... Are both although and nevertheless conjunctive adverbs?
Keep up the awesome work.
Morning! @Catija
@DamkerngT. I thought so.
15:58
Traditionally, although is a conjunction, and nevertheless is an adverb.
Hi guys :)

« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (482 days later) »