« first day (12 days earlier)      last day (486 days later) » 

00:27
@DamkerngT. Hi, DT. I was off eating dinner.
01:05
@StoneyB Hello again! I was away from keyboard. How are you?
01:38
@DamkerngT. Drifting in and out ... I don't seem to be being pinged. Maybe I've -- yes, I had my audio muted. 'doh!
Is MAR getting ready for a major Eh exam?
LOL -- I'm in and out regularly myself too.
@StoneyB I feel like he is always ready for any exam. :-)
I have no doubt he feels he is!
It's what comes after the exam that's hard. My wife's favorite line to her freshmen: "You're not in high school any more."
LOL
Indeed.
01:42
It takes them about one semester to figure that out.
Exactly what happened to me, too!
I got all possible grades in my first U semester. :-)
I wonder if I should tell Catija that MAR writes better English than most NS freshmen ...
A, B,C, D, F, W, X, you name it. :P
@StoneyB Sometimes he made me think he wasn't really 16.
It was second semester tripped me up, when I relaxed and flunked (let's not tell MAR) Chemistry.
Hah! It was chemistry for me too!
01:45
But I retook it over the summer and got a B.
I had to retake it a year later, but the lab hooked me up with a pretty girl. :-)
That was my excuse for that C.
My excuse for the F was girls, too: that's when I hooked up with two chicks named Thalia and Melpomene, the muses of Comedy and Tragedy.
Wow!
Melpomene reminds me of the name of a city in Asimov's novel.
I didn't get out of their clutches for 30 years.
01:50
Which Asimov? I used to know all of his stuff.
His autobiography is fascinating.
I think it's in Foundation and Earth, when Trevize looked for Earth all over the galaxy.
Oh, it wasn't a city name, it was a planet name. Sorry!
I remember that it was Melno-something, maybe Melnopomia.
Oh, the planet name was Melpomenia! (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_and_Earth)
That's a late one; I read it when it came out but haven't seen it since. --Heavens, that's almost 30 years ago! I'm really getting old.
Hehe!
I can't remember when I read it.
Maybe about 10 years ago.
I'm a v e r y s l o w reader these days: I think I've been reading Game of Thrones for the last ten years, and I haven't caught up yet.
Oh, I thought Game of Thrones was more recent than that!
Maybe because it just became so popular only recently.
I wonder how long an average landmark novel has to wait before it's become a big hit.
01:59
The first volume was published in 1996.
George Martin is even slower than I am.
Wow! That's almost 20 years!
Wikipedia says he is 67 this year.
My age. And still has two volumes to go.
I wonder maybe I might've read some of your work. :-)
Only what's on ELL/ELU. Unless you've been training as an insurance agent.
Oh! Hehe!
02:06
@DamkerngT. LotR was published in 54-55, and didn't take off until 63.
Do AIA life insurance contracts count? -- Hmm... but all the contracts I made with AIA are in Thai.
@StoneyB That's almost a decade!
American Institute of Architects?
Hehe! Oh, wait... Is it AIA or AIG over there?
Ah, AIG -- they were the folks whose reinsurance subsidiary got killed in the crash.
Yes! The branch over here had to readjust their structure a bit, iirc, but it turned out that the company here survived the crash fine.
02:12
Dunno about Thailand, but in the US life insurance is just about the most thoroughly regulated financial instrument there is, so it was largely untouched by the crash.
I believe it's quite similar here, which is quite fortunate for me. I don't want to think what would've happened if AIA here had crashed!
02:25
According to Wikipedia, the Fed made AIG sell out of AIA -- it's now owned by a UK group, Prudential plc.
No, I'm wrong. The Pru deal fell through, and AIA bought itself with a $20.5B IPO in 2010.
Oh! I didn't know that!
0
Q: Take Her By The Arm To Some Place

meatieI have a question about usage of "take". In this dictionary, definition 1 for "take" reads: to move something or someone from one place to another In the same entry, definition 7 for "take" reads: to reach out and get something, especially with your hand Then, on google, th...

What is meatie's problem?!
It looks like AIA Thailand is now a company under a new group, AAGIY, a listed company on Hong Kong stock market.
@StoneyB I think meatie was trying to understand (or substitute) the meaning of words or phrases according to definitions in dictionaries.
And it seems like they think definitions are always mutual exclusive.
2. [transitive] to cause someone to move somewhere take someone into/out of/up/through etc. something: My old job took me into the city a lot.
7 [transitive] to reach out and get something, especially with your hand take someone by the arm/hand etc.: Her mother took her gently by the shoulders.
I reely wanna ask these folks if that's the way their languages work.
If it's 2, it mustn't be 7, and vice versa.
@StoneyB I wonder how it works in their first language too!
Oh, I think I picked the wrong definition meatie had picked
1 [transitive] to move something or someone from one place to another take someone to/into/around something: What time do you take Amy to school?
I think it's 1 vs. 7 for them.
I know their problem but I don't know how to address the problem, nor how to fix it.
02:37
Maybe it's because so many SE folks are computer guys and think English was designed by somebody fiendishly clever like Niklaus Wirth.
Hehe!
Oh, I miss Turbo Pascal.
I loved that language. It was almost impossible to compile anything stupid.
Hehe! Absolutely true!
I've designed a small language for telephony applications, so I can say that designing a good language is not easy. There were too many loopholes in my design, but it was application specific, and its user-base wasn't large (I wonder if any of them still running), so it did its job sort of okay.
I never tried to write an actual language. My most ambitious project was Hebrew word processor -- without knowing a word of Hebrew!
Hah! How could it be possible?! Oh, maybe Hebrew alphabet is enough.
I wonder if my small language is really qualified as an actual language. Maybe it's Turing complete, but only defectively!
02:52
The tricky part was bypassing the MS-DOS character display and substituting my own design of the Hebrew alphabet and vowel points. I got that working, but I never could figure out how to get it onto a printer ...
@StoneyB You should've contacted me back then. :P
If the computer does what you tell it to do, it's a language. Pidgin-Turing, maybe!
Getting Thai characters onto printers was my main job during the first year of my career.
@StoneyB I like it! Pidgin-Turing!
Was that pre-Windows and pre-Unicode?
It was before Windows.
02:55
Happy night! Cards win! I can sleep tonight!
Hooray!
In those days, getting things to print on one printer was trivial, but I never did master how to talk to whatever-driver-came-along.
I remember we had a huge table of escape codes! :-)
Ahh... gotta go. It was a nice chat, as always. Talk to you again soon!
And you guys have like 40-something characters, distinguished by tee-niny little circular squiggles, right? Not real easy.
Sleep tight -- or, no, I guess you're in the working part of the day. Be brilliant!
@StoneyB Yes, some characters have to be displayed above others, some have to be displayed below!
03:01
Good night! I shall go dream of pennants.
We used 8-bit code back then. The character set is now included in Unicode range 0E00–0E7F.
Good night!
 
2 hours later…
05:05
@DamkerngT. Wake up!!
@JimReynolds ?
Nothing. I was just lonely.
O.O
o_O
"..."
What happened? You were left alone?
Oh, you mean in the room.
Well, actually, there are 14 legs in my apartment.
Not counting any insects.
Eww...
05:10
You are grossed out?
Or do you mean Awww . . . ?
I guess there are several thousand legs in my room.
(I've got a bee hive above my room.)
Honey bees? How cute!
In a minute, see if you get a present dropped on you from the universe.
Yeah, until they fly right at you, and sometimes sting you!
05:12
You are programmed to be stung? Bee stung.
I guess I'm getting better at it: getting stung.
How did you find my puzzle? Super easy, or just easy?
Which puzzle? I am not caught up at all. :"(
Oh. Lemme look.
An audio puzzle. Intriguing!
Uh. Is the .wav file silent?
I am a little puzzled.
? It's not silent!
05:22
Hmm..
Oh, you sent me an email?
Yes.
Wa HAHAHA I just turned my volume down to get a phone call (And I did this after starting to talk with you just now!!) O.O
Puzzle solved!!
Hahah.
Hmm.. On first play, I think I hear xx serial killer(s?) xxx isn't (ain't?) that gross?
Interesting!
05:26
serial killers tend to xxx within their own ethnic groups.
Second play
third time the charm.
And a southern (US) accent.
I can speak like that. :D
lol
I can't speak like that!
:D
05:28
It's quite fun to imitate, if you've heard it enough.
I spend half a summer in Dallas, Texas once. I came back to California with a semi-southern accent!
Oh, within just half a summer!
Remember, people don't always take well to humor (or even recognize it as humor) if they feel they're on opposing sides of something
Oh, +2 now.
It's so true. It's a strange phenomenon. I think if we get the slightest indication that we -click- with a stranger, or like them, or have something in common with them, we may assume that we share the same views on all matters.
Oh, I like snailboat, and she's so smart and funny. Obviously, she, therefore, has the same religious and philosophical views as me. O.O
05:32
In reality, snailboat may not be that advanced. O.0
What kind of reverse psychology is that?!?
Hm... I think it's a sort of cognitive error.
Social psychologists would be familiar with it.
I'm sure I've heard something about it academically, but at the moment, I just relate to it from personal experiences, having noticed it in myself and in others.
And when I notice it in others, it's "not smart". When I notice it in myself, it's simply human. :D
Hahaha!
05:35
There's a well-established psychological bias (at least in US Americans) called the self-enhancement bias.
"We're only human," said Robocop. o_O
Surveys regularly show that something like 80+% of people think they are better than average!
@JimReynolds curious!
More intelligent than average, better looking than average, taller than average, etc.
LOL.
The best paradox I've ever heard!
05:36
Some psychologists debate what's "better":
Some say that this kind of error helps us to be more confident, deal with difficult information about ourselves, and maybe be more willing to try things and persevere.
Oh, that does sound like Positive Thinking (TM).
Others think that the more realistically we see ourselves, the better we can navigate through life.
:-)
I made up the TM, BTW
Your trademark application is being processed.
05:39
I'm paranoid about malware.
Wraps condom around PC.
Quite reasonable.
o_O
That's unreasonable!
Hahaha.
You already called it reasonable. Too late!
MAR was desperately pinging me, I see.
Cute!
You even starred it!
@JimReynolds Like fish gasping for water!
Yes. I enjoy being pronounced reasonable.
Hahaha
There also seems to be a strong inclination for us to assume that a certain song, for example, should impact others the same as it does us.
@JimReynolds That's also reasonable.
Though I know that the same song doesn't always have the same effect for me every time I hear it.
05:46
In reality, what brings me back to say, wonderful memories of my early 20s or late teens is unlikely to do that for people who don't share my age and cultural background.
True.
I just had to stare at your "effect" for about 8 seconds, asking myself if it was right, or should have been "affect."
I think either works okay. Maybe in this kind of context, affect will be likelier than usual.
No. Affect wouldn't work, exactly.
Hmm... I remember that psychologists seem to like it.
Well, you could say does not evoke the same affect in me each time.
But "have the same effect" is a common expression.
nods
Oh, they aren't quite exactly the same thing. (after looking it up)
05:51
I think we would normally avoid "have the same affect" unless we were either playing with the language or maybe in an especially clear context.
Yes. Source of common errors.
Hi @MrTheWalrus
06:16
hola
Hi @Freddy! And bye!
(Gotta go)
@DamkerngT. Bye see you later
Later!
@snailboat え
|ω・`)チラッ
(I don't know how to say チラッ in English)
@Choko Does チラッ means "glance"??
06:23
Hehe, yeah I think it's something like that
|ω・`)sneakingly peeping into the chat room
Google translator says that but it is not always correct
I think it has a few different meanings
the pole stands for a wall
or a door
this one → |
May I ask a probably basic question
Is this double negative? → None of them are neither XXX nor YYY.
Should it be more like "None of them are either XXX or YYY"?
With neither we always use nor
Okay
Ahh for example "I like neither hot dogs or burger" does not make sense
06:32
Yeah, and here there's a "None"
What should I do with that
You wouldn't say "Any of them are neither XX nor YY", would you
@Freddy ahh your profile photo is scary!
none we can't use with neither. (I can't think any sentence containing both none and neither)
Yes it is scary, but trust me I am not scary :D
Fred "Freddy" Krueger is the main antagonist of the A Nightmare on Elm Street film series. He first appeared in Wes Craven's A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) as a burnt serial killer who uses a glove armed with razors to kill his victims in their dreams, causing their deaths in the real world as well. In the dream world, he is a powerful force and almost completely invulnerable to damage. However, whenever Freddy is pulled into the real world, he has normal human vulnerabilities. Krueger was created by Wes Craven, and had been consistently portrayed by Robert Englund since his first appearance...
Ahh that Freddy
(I've never seen the film, though)
Me neither
First time When I came into chat room everyone where asking me about Freddy Kruger, so i changed my profile pic
@MARamezani Hola
Hullo!
@Freddy Don't remember the film.
I do, But I have not seen it like other actor who watch there own film. :)
06:43
@MARamezani Are you saying you don't remember it, or telling Freddy not to remember it?
@Choko I don't remember it.
Okay
It's called ellipsis.
I omitted the obvious subject: I.
It's still hard for me
@Choko This kinda ellipsis is very informal.
06:45
I still don't know where it can be left out
Don't worry.
Now you're telling me to not worry. hehe
@MARamezani you always confuse me
@Choko In a written document, Don't remember it hardly is conceived as ellipsis.
@Freddy Mission accomplished.
Heh
@MARamezani haha
06:46
I meant your name and display pic
I mean, if you're writing an email to your professor don't remember it is perceived as an imperative sentence.
@Freddy Why?
So your display name happened to be the same as the character, or did you take it from the film?
Does MARanezani means cyclohexane? Yours name and display pic does not suit each other
@Freddy MAR is my name.
Real name.
MA is the abbreviation of my first name
@Choko my display name happened to be the same as the character. My full name is Freddy Thobhani
06:49
and Ramezani is my last name.
But that's just a disguise. I am a cyclohexane!!!
Benzene > cyclohexane
:)
I ate benzene alright. Don't tell the police.
Chemically you cant
you can ask to @Choko
But in real world...
@MARamezani You mean chemistry which we are learning is not real!!!!!!
06:54
Of course it isn't. Ask the water molecules present in the room.
Water molecules in English chat room?? Is he mad like cyclohexane :D
He's crazier!
@MARamezani You should try to dissolve in water
@Freddy This water refused me. :'(
I know because he is polar and you are non polar
07:00
Screw polars!
Screw non polar too. So there is one less topic to study
@Choko We'd probably say: None of them are X or Y.
@JimReynolds Hullo!
@JimReynolds Ohhh I see!
07:06
Hi!
Long time, no see.
Thank you!
Do you want to know for writing or speech, and in what kind of situation (how formal)?
We can say "Viruses are neither plants nor animals."
@JimReynolds You aren
Around!
It's a bit formal. For writing, it would be fine.
Yes. I've been working more. :'(
And crying more, respectively.
07:08
Exactly.
@JimReynolds I just happened to see the sentence in JLSE
I'm not going to correct/edit their post,
I was just curious
I thought maybe it would be okay in casual, colloquial speech to say "None of them are neither XX nor YY"
I wasn't sure
(But you just said 'neither ~ nor' is formal)
As Freddy said, we won't use none along with neither.
I see
Not in standard language.
We might colloquially use it.
So "None of them are ~ or ~"
07:15
Or is ok with None.
None of the neither of his messages make no sense nor have some value...
Yeah this makes more sense to me
Some people won't like it, or would argue.
But it's common in speech, and acceptable to at least some "experts" in writing.
I think there is something in many dictionaries about it. Let me take a quick look.
As a conjunction neither is properly followed by nor, not or, in formal style: Neither prayers nor curses (not or curses) did any good.
Ohhh
Actually I often used 'neither ~ or ~'
It's common in ordinary use. At least in AmE.
07:22
@Choko Your funeral.
hehe
@JimReynolds Thank you for your help, sir
I'm stepping out now,
See you!
Ciao everyone
07:23
Either I am right, or MARamezani is wrong.
@JimReynolds Perfect conclusion.
lol they practically mean the same
 
2 hours later…
09:40
I wonder where @Dam is today.
 
4 hours later…
13:14
@MARamezani Behind you, lurking... :P
13:32
The underlying assumption of this appears to be that ELL is for the easy questions and ELU is for the hard questions. THIS IS NOT TRUE. Both sites frown on very easy questions, especially ones that would be easily answered by a dictionary or thesaurus. The difference is that ELL is for questions that wouldn't occur to a native speaker, not because they're easy, but because it's something that a native speaker Just Knows(TM). — Martha Jan 25 '13 at 19:34
Now, the problem is how to help learners to "just know" as well.
2
A: If vs. Whether?

Maulik VThey are not always interchangeable. If you are confused what to use where, here is a tip: We generally prefer 'whether' after prepositions. Said that, don't use 'if' in such cases. I asked my friend about if whether she had an affair. I am only interested in if whether you are working...

Hmm...
> We generally prefer 'whether' after prepositions.
Sort of true. Macmillan asserts it much stronger: "Use whether, but not if, after a preposition: There are doubts about whether the system is safe."
Which leads me to the example jumped out of the answer to me:
> I asked my friend about if whether she had an affair.
I think I will delete that about as well.
This is another example from Macmillan, which I think whether after a preposition sounds right:
> There was a debate over whether or not to send troops.
Hmm...
> While using 'if' or 'whether' take care if you are including 'or not' as another option.
An uncommon use of if (in take care if) in an answer to question If vs. Whether.
13:54
1
Q: The concise way to say "I don't know Python"

xptI want to say that I don't know Python (a programming language), whose precise meaning is that I have zero knowledge on Python. If I want to say it in a concise way, i.e., using it as a construction part in a longer sentence, can I say, I am Python-agnostic or I am Python-blind or something like ...

Reminds me of "total noob" and "absolute noob".
But "noob" usually implies "knowing a bit" or at least "wanna learn" or "wannabe".
Anonymous
Yeah, the concise way would be "I don't know Python"
Indeed! The OP already answered their own question.
Morning!
Anonymous
Morning!

« first day (12 days earlier)      last day (486 days later) »