« first day (4046 days earlier)      last day (736 days later) » 

00:03
@Feeds I've been playing around a lot with ChatGPT and other new-age models - Stable Diffusion etc - and I honestly can't wait to see if and how they get integrated into Mathematica. I never used all the crypto functions that were added in that heyday, but I'm really hoping for a similar amount of support offered to LLMs and generative AI in general.
Have had a few thoughts about feeding the WL documentation into eg gpt-index.readthedocs.io or into some magic LangChain stuff (langchain.readthedocs.io). It's really fun at the moment, because it's such early stages into the applications of these things, and what it might be like in three years is really exciting.
Or, it'll turn into self-driving cars and we'll never really see it perfectly executed. Who knows. Exciting times, though.
 
9 hours later…
08:39
@rhermans I'm not sure why you deleted your answer: mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/279995/12 I didn't mean the upside down bars past the point where bars cross the x axis, which you can see in your answer. Those are easy to deal with using PlotRangeClipping -> True. I mean that everything is upside down.
I'm still mostly stuck on macOS 10.14, meaning being stuck with 13.1 ... I wasn't sure if 13.2 is better at this.
09:08
@Szabolcs Sorry, at the time, I didn't have head space to articulate a comment, and then I forgot. I was indeed using 13.2.1 when creating that plot. After your comment I tried in 13.1 and, as you say, my solution didn't work. So, I thought there was no point on my answer, if in reality didn't make any difference to you.
09:51
@Dunlop just a small piece advice, if you are making 3 comments within the 5 minutes were you can edit the comments, probably it would be best to edit the first to consolidate them into a single comment. We have too many questions with long list of comments which end up very sparse in content.
10:43
@bmf No problem, I just wanted to clear things up and express my frustration :) As for another recent example (mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/280051/…): This question is not really about how to calculate the length of elliptic arc, because the user already knows it. All (s)he needs is to use N[] and read about symbolic vs. numeric expressions – something that is explained many times on this site ...
bmf
bmf
11:05
@Domen yes, I can see your point of view. And of course, it makes sense. I was just trying to point out that roughly 14% of the questions are either unanswered or with no upvoted and/or accepted answers. In some cases, there are answers and the person who posted a question cannot even be bothered to press a button. But in some cases there's a simple answer that is left as a comment.
Anyway, I am not sure if we should care for the percentage of unanswered questions, but I was searching on Meta about this subject and it seems that there have been discussions in the past.
 
5 hours later…
15:59
@ChrisK I really think the above causes significant shivers when dealing with computational geometry. Square roots of five are an invention of the devil for comparisons!

« first day (4046 days earlier)      last day (736 days later) »