« first day (3747 days earlier)      last day (1038 days later) » 

JimB
JimB
01:31
@bmf Not a stupid question. I think there are several situations when an answer addresses the original question and addresses deficiencies in other answers. I occasionally find answers to statistical questions "grammatically correct" but completely ignore or are ignorant of the necessary assumptions and requirements of the particular statistical analysis. (But maybe I'm misinterpreted your question.)
And not just for statistical analyses. I have to imagine that the same thing applies to physics, chemistry, and engineering questions.
bmf
bmf
01:50
@JimB thanks for the comment. I think there's a slight misunderstanding. I am always happy to see many answers either alternatives or just correcting previous statements. If you read the answers to the link I provided, they are not answers to the question essentially. So, I am wondering what do we do in situations like that one?
 
1 hour later…
Meta
Meta
03:01
0
Q: Cannot expand any MMA web page command details on latest Edge Browser

MooI just downloaded the new Microsoft Edge - Version 100.0.1185.50 (Official build) (64-bit). When I go to any MMA web command page like Table, for example, I cannot click on Options and get it to expand. I also cannot expand any of Scope, Generalizations & Extensions, Applications, Properties & Re...

discussion
 
3 hours later…
dtn
dtn
05:40
Hello! On the wiki, I found a table comparing deep learning algorithms and saw Mathematica there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_deep_learning_software

Because I am actively working in it now, I decided to take the time to try to study this issue as well. Tell me please, with what materials can I get deep learning in Mathematica?
 
10 hours later…
Chris K
Chris K
15:39
@dtn I know literally nothing about it, but did just see this book:
wolfram-media.com/products/…
C. E.
C. E.
16:12
@dtn You can learn a lot by simply perusing the documentation of functions. It is pretty great at showing not just what the syntax is but also what some applications are. And there is some tutorial style content as well, such as this: reference.wolfram.com/language/tutorial/…
rm -rf
rm -rf
17:01
You can do a few things:
1. Downvote so that it goes to the bottom of the pile. With enough downvotes, it will get slightly faded out to de-emphasize it on the page.
2. Leave a helpful comment explaining why it is not an answer and suggestions to the OP if it can be improved.
3. If it is entirely useless, you can vote to delete the answer if you have 20k+ rep. I believe you can only do this if the post has ≤ 0 votes.
4. Flag it for a moderator if it is spam/abuse or otherwise entirely unrelated (e.g. a rant about something else), but not when it is just wrong because of math/code/technical …
bmf
bmf
17:20
@rm-rf thanks for taking the time to explain all the above. I appreciate it a lot. I was under the impression that I could flag "answers" like those that appeared in the aforementioned link. Sorry for any inconvenience I might have caused to the moderators. I will take the above comments into consideration for future purposes
rm -rf
rm -rf
18:13
@bmf No problem! I'm sure there are other sites in the network where mods do cleanup answers like the ones you mentioned above, but on this site mods have generally avoided doing that because of the diverse nature of Mathematica usage — the questions often come from very specialized fields and we are not the best judges of whether something is technically correct within that domain or not :)
 
2 hours later…
Feeds
Feeds
20:01
Wolfram Blog: New in 13: Trees
posted on April 22, 2022 by Stephen Wolfram

Two years ago we released Version 12.0 of the Wolfram Language. Here are the updates in trees since then, including the latest features in 13.0. The contents of this post are compiled from Stephen Wolfram’s Release Announcements for 12.1, 12.2, 12.3 and 13.0.   Trees! (May 2021) Based on the number of new built-in functions […]


« first day (3747 days earlier)      last day (1038 days later) »