About 256951 @MichaelE2 the user may be experienced, but that is not a good question. It's open-ended, off-topic, doesn't share neither context nor effort. It's not a personal attack, it's an evaluation of the question.
We have been discussing that new users should receive an explanation for the apparently harsh response to a bad question, but that doesn't imply a change of policy on what a reasonable question is, does it?
(BTW, I didn't down vote mainly because your comment dissuaded me, and I want to understand your point better before I cast a vote.)
@rhermans No, it's not a good question yet. I believe that issue should be handled on math.SE, though. If the question is migrated, the issue of quality here, that is, whether it is a good Mathematica question, becomes irrelevant for this site.
Math.SE criteria are probably different from ours. It may be acceptable to assume users know the context (it clearly is on MathOverflow). Any efforts on this site to improve the question may be misguided if the question belongs on another site. Further, a point I forgot, I don't think a question with a negative vote total can be migrated.
I'd also say a good way to respond to a poor question is to ask them to improve with some constructive criticism. If they don't, then downvote. Unless it appears to be spam. Then downvote immediately and flag.
I don't suppose anyone who's been watching the event has heard anything about process limits being increased? It kinda sucks that home licenses only have 4 available threads.
Leaders in many top organizations and institutions have played a major role in using computational intelligence and pushing the boundaries of how the Wolfram technology stack is leveraged for innovation across fields and disciplines. We recognize these deserving recipients with the Wolfram Innovator Award, which is awarded at the annual Wolfram Technology Conference. We are […]
