@user76284 Not sure but it might just not be sophisticated enough when it comes to such a weird integral. On the other hand even I can integrate that one:
@b3m2a1 Sadly I haven't seen anything about it in the livestreams or the prerelease. But perhaps if the video export is so much improved, I don't care about gifs...
@C.E. there is no real alternative, it's just super slow in the FE since the FE rasterization is so brutally slow. Sometimes you get better performance by pre-rasterizing, since then the FE doesn't pick some weird rasterization options, but the stitching is painstakingly slow
@b3m2a1 @C.E. Yes, the stitching itself is extremely slow. I normally generate my frames ahead of time with a ParallelTable or something, but Export["my.gif", frames] still takes forever (when compared with gifsicle or imagemagick or whatever).
And the output gif is normally 50MB+, when compared with gifsicle which creates a 45KB gif instead with no obvious loss in quality.
What's the difference between {{x1,y1,z1},{x2,y2,z2},...} and {pt1,pt2,...} when it comes to Tube? It does not seem to have any rhyme or reason. I can wrap my list of point coordinates in Line and it works fine. BUT when I try to use the same list in Tube it does this:
Tube is on the left & Line is on the right. What gives? I can ask a question with specific data, also, if this is recommended. Just seems like a simple misunderstanding of how Tube works. I thought I figured out the problem, but I really did not.
@kirma honestly the only way I find it breaks is with this data set that, for whatever reason, is enjoyed by Line, but detested by Tube. Would posting the data set here be productive? By productive I mean its a 100 length list of machine number triples & I don't know if it will post here due to length
@CATrevillian Just speculating. If I were you, I'd try to trim the dataset from beginning and end and see if at some point the Tube version starts behaving better.
I'll do this, and maybe just take an internal cut of the data, since, from my fiddling per your recommendation, it doesn't matter what part of the data is used! That way I don't have a huge code block of boring numbers haha!
I have a set of data that Line enjoys quite well, however, Tube seems to throw something of a tantrum when I deliver the same set of data. The data:
data = {{-1214.2199935658107`,-848.2705321806565`,-0.00001416666666666664`},{-1244.2463057872262`,-804.5024679750907`,-0.000013333333333333296`},{-...
@Kuba Does it actually work to keep persistent data in a variable like that between diffeent FormFunction calls? I get the sense that data will need to be kept elsewhere (a CloudObject perhaps) and written to & retrieved after submit
But I might be misunderstanding your intent
Is there some problem with this answer that I'm not seeing? I'm unsure of why it has gotten such a poor reception when the question has been viewed plenty of times. there are no other answers and it seems to me like it answers the (very sparse) question. https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/215333/how-to-test-upload-speed/215342?noredirect=1#comment550760_215342 I'm genuinely asking - it feels as though I've missed something really stupid and nobody wants to tell me :)
(I really don't want to come across like I'm fishing for votes - please don't take it that way!)