« first day (1653 days earlier)      last day (3129 days later) » 

Shutao Tang
Shutao Tang
05:56
@J.M. Hi, J.M., I sent an email to you just now.
 
3 hours later…
Szabolcs
Szabolcs
08:50
user image
kirma
kirma
09:15
@Szabolcs Any specific logic on that coloring?
Szabolcs
Szabolcs
09:37
@kirma Just random.
kirma
kirma
09:53
Thought so. :)
 
1 hour later…
J. M.
J. M.
11:13
@Szabolcs Went nuts with the complete graph, eh? :)
Szabolcs
Szabolcs
11:56
@J.M. Actually it's two complete graphs with no connections inbetween them. But yes :) It's done by Graphics[{Antialiasing -> False, ...}], then rasterize at high resolution, MorphologicalComponents, Colorize, downscale.
kirma
kirma
user image
2
My favourite work desk toys!
To continue this circular/spherical theme.
J. M.
J. M.
12:24
@kirma, Richmond's surface looks pretty here. :) That's bronze, I presume?
kirma
kirma
12:42
@J.M. Actually it's brass, but pretty similar indeed.
 
1 hour later…
JasonB
JasonB
13:55
Is there a duplicate for this question?
How can I get the actual plot range for a single inset object?
plot = Plot[x, {x, 0, 300}];
inset = Graphics[Inset[plot, {-5, 5}, {0, 0}], Frame -> True]
PlotRange@inset
Charting`get2DPlotRange@inset
user image
 
2 hours later…
Michael E2
Michael E2
16:20
19
Q: How to get the real PlotRange using AbsoluteOptions?

SilviaThe problem in general involves the unreliable behaviour of AbsoluteOptions when option values are implicitly specified (e.g. Automatic, All, Full, etc.), for example the graphics below clearly has a different plot range than the one reported by AbsoluteOptions: {g = Graphics[{}, Frame -> True],...

graphics graphics3d options
Wolfram Blog
Wolfram Blog
16:51
Wolfram Blog: Introducing Wolfram|Alpha Add-ons for Google Drive
posted on July 28, 2016 by Stephanie Oh

Wolfram|Alpha answers a ton of computational and factual questions every day—through our website, mobile apps, APIs, and from within the Wolfram Language itself. Now we would like to introduce a new way to harness the power of computation with the Wolfram|Alpha Add-ons for Google Drive. These free add-ons for Google Docs and Google Sheets enable [...]

 
3 hours later…
JasonB
JasonB
19:46
@MichaelE2 - it's odd that it won't work on a `Graphics` that is simply an `Inset`,
In[57]:= completePlotRange@inset
plotRange@inset

During evaluation of In[57]:= Last::nolast: {} has zero length and no last element. >>

Out[57]= Last[{}]

During evaluation of In[57]:= Last::nolast: {} has zero length and no last element. >>

Out[58]= Last[{}]
Michael E2
Michael E2
@JasonB Hmm, seems to work for me: 
completePlotRange@inset
(*  {{-7.60417, -2.39583}, {2.4, 7.6}}  *)

plotRange@inset
(*  {{-7.5, -2.5}, {2.5, 7.5}}  *)
JasonB
JasonB
are you using 10.4? Maybe it's just a problem with 10.3.1
Kuba
Kuba
20:13
I need a good explanation why this isn't just `"1+1"` but contains `Unevaluated`:

InputForm@Unevaluated[1 + 1]

please :)
 
1 hour later…
Meta
Meta
21:14
0
Q: documentation of mathematica : Part isn't mentioned in the documentation for Table?

user1952009(Sorry if it is not the correct place for talking about this) It is not the first time I have the feeling mathematica's documentation is a big joke. As an example, I just spent 10 minutes for understanding that after having built a Table : mu = Table[MoebiusMu[n],{n,1,100}] I need to use Par...

bug
andre
andre
21:43
Hello. For those who participate to the comments on the meta-question about Table and Part (now deleted), where does come the person ? Matlab universe, other... Apparently a lot of new comers are Table-centric instead of List-centric.
Rolf Mertig
Rolf Mertig
22:09
@Kuba It is written that InputForm acts as a "wrapper", which affects display, but not evaluation. So, since it does not evaluate and since Unevaluated only goes away if a function evaluates (check f[x_] := Hold[x]; f@Unevaluated[1 + 1]), this is all logical, or?
Michael E2
Michael E2
22:42
@JasonB Yes, V10.4.1.

« first day (1653 days earlier)      last day (3129 days later) »