« first day (2253 days earlier)      last day (3034 days later) » 

07:55
^^^ no wonder they think so...
16
A: Let's Plan the Second Iteration of the Stack Exchange Quality Project!

gnatAs far as I can tell about 15 millions views at Stack Overflow are on inappropriate (historically locked) questions. (285 locked questions have views between 10K and 100K plus 158 questions with views between 100K and 1M plus 3 questions with views over 1M) Visual difference between historicall...

08:49
09:44
In a "..." CSV field also line breaks may occur, maybe not CR-LF but LF. Check that there is a next field "bisexual". Check the data in a programmers editor (Notepad++ or such). — Joop Eggen 35 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
12:01
Can we institute a "no US politics" rule in this room?
5
 
2 hours later…
14:01
yes?
14:43
@MetaFight I don't see much (any?) political discussion here. We already have rules that protect from disruption. Let's only create new rules when there's multiple (or at least one) compelling (preferably not hypothetical) reasons.
If people want to talk politics and it's out of order, we can tell them to take it to agora or politics.SE.
If they're being disruptive, they can be kicked or put in a longer time-out by a mod.
15:44
So. About that Hillary fellow...
hits ignore action
user114359
@RobertHarvey Iseewhatyoudidthere
16:01
Now now...
16:48
relevant to yesterday's convo:
17:01
Reference too obscure. Meesa no understanding.
@ThomasOwens: Can we get this question migrated to Stack Overflow?
@RobertHarvey Is there a reason why it's off topic here that I'm not seeing?
Technically it's an "Explain this code" question.
I have no problem with it being here, but people are already downvoting it.
Oh, OK. I see now.
Yeah, I can migrate that.
I thought it was about design at first. One sec.
OK, I just sent it over to SO.
Sweet. Already has three upvotes.
sigh
at least 2 before the migrate, only one down before the migrate too
I don't think we should be so anxious to migrate.
17:06
I think it will get better exposure over there.
that's possible, but they asked it here, and I don't think it was off-topic.
A very well written, "Why doesn't this code work" question.
We're supposed to be jealous of our questions. stackoverflow.blog/2012/03/…
Well, you can blame the downvoter. The OP has a very good track record on Stack Overflow, and is probably not used to this kind of reception.
@AaronHall We explicitly say that explain this code is off-topic here in the Help Center.
17:11
ok, but it kinda looked like a fundamentals of JS kind of question to me.
It's entirely about that object prototype declaration; the OP was very specific about that, actually stating that it wasn't about FP.
ok, I'll allow that you're right, I'm just concerned about our questions here, and I don't want to lose good ones.
It was a good question. He's asked several good questions on Stack Overflow.
Here's some more spurious info: after accepting my answer and unaccepting an old (and poor) one, a question earned twice as many upvotes in the month after as it did the month prior.
Changing the accept must bump the question.
17:22
it may have, it got 2 on the day of the change, versus 3 the month prior, and 5 more the rest of the month.
People vote on questions in the context of their answers.
So annoying.
Tom
Tom
butter up anything and it'll move fast and slick. doesn't mean its any good though.
I tried to click the x
would be nice if individual posts had a "hide post" option.
I'm not responsible for latent senility. :P
Tom
Tom
With all the promotion of Edge MS is doing, I can't help but wonder if they're panicking over the market share numbers and not thinking clearly: computerworld.com/article/3137373/web-browsers/…
17:32
Firefox gains. Not surprising, given that Chrome is such a pig with memory and disk space.
They're right to promote it, strategically.
That doesn't mean that I want to see it promoted.
I wonder how I'd do if I bought stock in RedHat and shorted Apple and Microsoft.
Short Samsung instead... Though it's probably too late for that now.
Video on the interwebz is still a terrible experience. 30 second commercials for 2 minute videos, multiple videos playing simultaneously.... Bleaugh.
17:48
I love it when people post comments on my canonical answers, like, "this is the best answer" - which happened to me again today.
+1 would upvote again
Those little signals are very helpful when confused readers are wondering what they should upvote.
> One little thing can revive a guy
And that is a piece of rhubarb pie
Serve it up, nice and hot
Maybe things aren't as bad as you thought
 
2 hours later…
19:57
trying to put my slides together for my panel discussion
Need to get them approved in advance. :(
5 pages or so
(slides)
20:26
I figure I'm at 40 points for the mod elections on Stack Overflow, if anyone wants to talk me out of it, they're running out of time. :)
20:48
I'm trying to read the history of Simula and Smalltalk at the same time. :/
21:15
kinda neat that they assumed a Fortran implementation of Simula, in spite of implementing it in Algol 60.
21:30
although they wound up integrating it in the Algol compiler.
Tom
Tom
21:41
is it a bad thing that I have no idea what you're talking about?
Not if he's just making shit up.
22:10
From an project management perspective, it's very interesting how much they put on paper before actually starting to write the implementation.
Tom
Tom
Ok, I'm back after a break, and understand it now :)
They actually wrote it on the Univac.
Tom
Tom
22:27
hmm... univac... one hoover to rule them all?
UNIVAC is the name of a line of electronic digital stored-program computers starting with the products of the Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation. Later the name was applied to a division of the Remington Rand company and successor organizations. UNIVAC is an acronym for UNIVersal Automatic Computer. The BINAC, built by the Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corporation, was the first general-purpose computer for commercial use. The descendants of the later UNIVAC 1107 continue today as products of the Unisys company. == Univac history and structure == J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly built the ENIAC ...
Tom
Tom
yes, i know. i'm just tired
I'm going home! Cheers!!
Tom
Tom
see ya

« first day (2253 days earlier)      last day (3034 days later) »