« first day (4773 days earlier)      last day (19 days later) » 

00:19
0
A: Requests for Reopen & Undeletion Votes (volume 01/2022 - today)

Patryk CzachurskiClosed, Deleted, Undeleted, Deleted again Discovered a generalization of the age-old pairing function $2^{y}(2x + 1) - 1$: in higher bases, it drops the exponent and approaches multiplication. I would love some insights on what is still wrong with my question. I have shortened it as advised by m...

00:33
For your consideration, closing votes: C1, C2, C3.
00:53
D1, D2, D3,
D4, D5, D6,
D7, D8, D9
 
6 hours later…
06:29
Consider deleting the following incorrect answer
07:16
close solution verification
 
3 hours later…
10:07
I think this question should be closed. It is better suited to MathOverflow, it is over 10 years old with no answers, and it mostly outlines a serious-but-known-to-be-false proof of an open problem.
 
2 hours later…
12:24
Jan 29 at 21:17, by Sine of the Time
Also this one, SV which was reopened; I can't anymore vote to close
 
4 hours later…
16:19
0
A: Requests for Reopen & Undeletion Votes (volume 01/2022 - today)

userI ask to open the question: $\alpha \arccos(x_1) + (1 - \alpha) \arccos(x_2) \geq \arccos \left( \alpha x_1 + (1 - \alpha)x_2 \right)$ if $\alpha x_1 + (1 - \alpha)x_2 < 0$? The stated reason for closing the question is invalid. The question is clear and does not require additional details or cla...


« first day (4773 days earlier)      last day (19 days later) »