« first day (4443 days earlier)      last day (349 days later) » 

Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
01:09
cv-pls real-analysis The community user just bumped this. It should probably be closed / deleted as "too broad" (IMO). Find the interior, exterior, and boundary of the sets‭ - combo student‭ 2017-01-18 20:43:27Z
 
1 hour later…
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
02:26
D1
Is-useful PSQ: C1
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
02:54
@Ѕᴀᴀᴅ When you see "is it useful?", can you please raise a flag or ping me?
 
2 hours later…
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
04:33
@XanderHenderson OK
D2
 
4 hours later…
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
08:24
D3
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
09:10
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (140): Time Complexity‭ by sexy mimiyang‭ on math.SE
 
1 hour later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
10:33
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer (89): Graph Theory :: Graph Conversion‭ by Андрей Стоим‭ on math.SE
 
2 hours later…
user21820
user21820
12:12
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.
D10, D11, D12.
 
1 hour later…
Jose Avilez
Jose Avilez
13:34
Very low quality contribution by high rep user
 
2 hours later…
rschwieb
rschwieb
15:21
VLQ math.stackexchange.com/q/4879675/29335
KReiser
KReiser
15:58
c1 c2
 
1 hour later…
Peter
Peter
17:07
please delete
Jakobian
Jakobian
17:19
dupe
Peter
Peter
18:19
please delete
 
2 hours later…
Feeds
Feeds
20:21
1
A: Requests for Reopen & Undeletion Votes (volume 01/2022 - today)

Qualcuno2The question Fractal separation was closed for not meeting the guidelines of Mathematics Stack Exchange. However, I asked here if it was good enough to be reopened, and got a good feedback. I think it could be reopened now.

 
2 hours later…
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
22:23
@Feeds should not have been reopened, imo.
2
Jakobian
Jakobian
22:58
@XanderHenderson seems like all the edits were superficial. It surprises me how this post got finally reopened...
clearly the community doesn't want it
> However, I asked here if it was good enough to be reopened, and got a good feedback. I think it could be reopened now.
I think this is phrased in a very manipulative kind of way
The OP didn't really change anything in their post
Moreover, no one was encouraging that the post should be re-opened, and the issue of having to watch the video to understand the post still persists
direct link to the question that was reopened

« first day (4443 days earlier)      last day (349 days later) »