« first day (4037 days earlier)      last day (756 days later) » 

0
Q: Some new properties of the zeta function on the critical line

leo limahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/367240704_PROPERTIES_OF_THE_RIEMANN_ZETA_FUNCTION_IN_THE_CRITICAL_RANGE In this article we will prove by reduction to absurdity that the Riemann zeta function admits at least one non-trivial zero outside the critical range. Help me verify these arguments!!!!

01:37
0
Q: Unsolved linear differential equations?

NikoIt appears to me that most of the (partial/integro) differential equations that we find difficult/impossible to solve (even numerically), are all nonlinear, like the Navier-Stokes equation. Are there many difficult linear (partial/integro) differential equations out there? The many-body Schröding...

 
5 hours later…
06:55
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin body (78): A problem from gonitzoggo‭ by Ībrãhîm‭ on math.SE
07:49
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin body (78): A problem from gonitzoggo ✏️‭ by Ībrãhîm‭ on math.SE
 
1 hour later…
09:12
@Semiclassical Because of the (unjustified) upvotes , 20K+users unfortunately cannot do anything either. Apart from the cheat aspect, this question should be deleted anyway.
09:22
@Semiclassical score 10:8 !
10:31
Silly answer to an old question.
PSQ with an accepted answer.
 
3 hours later…
13:25
please close - another contextless question answered by a high-rep user
14:12
please delete - even if roomba will eventually do that automatically ...
14:41
To summarize it : Tons of low-quality , but answered questions :(
@Peter seems that the same user is answering low-quality question
14:56
@SineoftheTime Too few and too slow or perhaps not consequent enough delete-voters. Everything has been said in the first comment , but still the answer (that should not have been given) received an upvote !
16:24
@Peter gone
@Peter gone
@Peter gone
Open for deletion Thanks, @Sine
I've attached the link in a comment in response to @Shaun
@SineoftheTime I've seen it; it's closed, but with two answers, it is possible it will be reopened by another gold-badger.
16:54
this suspicious post is not even closed.
 
1 hour later…
19:40
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body, blacklisted user (71): Is the Riemann hypothesis false?‭ by leo lima‭ on math.SE
19:58
The user leo lima continues to spam every few days post about the RH, claiming it's false. It seems, moreover, that his questions are generated by AI
 
3 hours later…
22:31
math.stackexchange.com/questions/4629873/… what do you think about this?
:62887252 It's deleted and after few days it appears again
22:46
@SineoftheTime A lot of eyes now are aware of that. We just need to continue to be observant, always flag for mod attention, since the user has now had four accounts deleted, and I suspect the mods are investigating, and perhaps escalating the issue to the network wide community mods, who have more tools available than do site mods.
@Sine Also, I very much appreciate how perceptive you are!
@amWhy ty for the information, btw I don't understand why he'd talk about such important "discovery" on MSE. clearly before publishing it, experts have to check if it's true
@SineoftheTime Folks asking for reviews of such efforts, on our site, is really off topic, and they usually, if submitted to a credible journal, are rejected. That's one of the reasons "review my paper" + link, are consistently off topic. But any user re-asking the same question over and over again, creating new usernames when banned from asking, is asking for deletion of their account, more or less.
@bobeyt6 Nice find.

« first day (4037 days earlier)      last day (756 days later) »