« first day (4000 days earlier)      last day (792 days later) » 

Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ
05:08
C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
D1, D2, D3, D4, D5,
D6, D7, D8, D9, D10
 
3 hours later…
Feeds
Feeds
07:51
2
Q: Collatz Conjecture Inquiry

M.LI recently decided to look into the problem for fun, and I came across a pathway to a proof, and, though it's rather long, I was wondering if it has been investigated before. So, for the Collatz Conjecture, to prove it, we just need to prove that applying the corresponding operation to every numb...

collatz-conjecture
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
08:49
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body (41): In a book on stochastic processes, the following equation is given without derivation, can someone show a proof?‭ by Bill‭ on math.SE
Peter
Peter
09:35
The level of censorship in this room is getting grotesque. First , I received a complain that "C" and "D" are too short requests (why?) and then , every discussion is nipped in the bud. This way , we won't increase the quality of this site !
Peter
Peter
10:10
please delete
Paramanand Singh
Paramanand Singh
10:46
@Peter just to make myself clear, I have mentioned the problem of single letter links as they are difficult to click on a mobile device. But I have not nipped any discussion in the bud. Discussion relevant to room topic are welcome.
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
10:56
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer (85): Bounding the distance between roots of a polynomial?‭ by Danil Kurenkov‭ on math.SE
Peter
Peter
@SmokeDetector should be deleted
@ParamanandSingh I have not claimed that you did that. But it happened with a reply to a claim that a particular question would be fine which is not the case.
Paramanand Singh
Paramanand Singh
11:37
@Peter thanks, since I had mentioned the problem of single letter links earlier I thought to clarify my stand.
Merry Christmas to all!
 
2 hours later…
Peter
Peter
13:23
please downvote/delete
Peter
Peter
14:07
answer to a question with no context
amWhy
amWhy
14:24
@Peter You already linked the question. Yes, the second link is a link to the answer to the above link. I see no request regarding the second link.
Goku カカロット
Goku カカロット
14:46
math.stackexchange.com/q/4605352/1092912 Vague question, should be closed. The math ain't mathing here.
Goku カカロット
Goku カカロット
15:39
math.stackexchange.com/q/4605401/1092912 He doesn't edit in his own proof. Needs to be closed
Peter
Peter
15:55
almost reopened - quick final delete vote needed.
amWhy
amWhy
@Peter gone
Peter
Peter
16:25
@amWhy Thank you !
amWhy
amWhy
@Peter np :)
 
2 hours later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
18:01
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, potentially bad keyword in body, toxic body detected (105): To the Mods, and people in this community:‭ by student 828382‭ on math.SE
amWhy
amWhy
@SmokeDetector It's been deleted.
 
1 hour later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
19:27
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body (41): I have a topology task, it has to be not difficult, pls help‭ by UrDad‭ on math.SE
 
2 hours later…
amWhy
amWhy
21:36
@SmokeDetector Now deleted.
Goku カカロット
Goku カカロット
22:06
math.stackexchange.com/q/4605526/1092912 Negative effort question
amWhy
amWhy
@Gokuカカロット A good way to summarize today would be "a torrent of very low quality questions or bare-boned-problem-statements.
Goku カカロット
Goku カカロット
22:31
math.stackexchange.com/q/4603982/1092912 super low effort

« first day (4000 days earlier)      last day (792 days later) »