« first day (3693 days earlier)      last day (801 days later) » 

12:06 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (34): Create Absolute Value Equation from 2 lines‭ by MyGoodSir‭ on math.SE
 
 
7 hours later…
7:14 AM
0
Q: Can we, from the accelerated Collatz map $f(x) = |3x+1|_2(3x+1)$ derive a Singular Homology theory (or would strictly Cohomology be needed)?

PenAndPaperMathematicsBackground: (required for Collatz novices and maybe well-known by Collatz experimenters) Let $f(x) = |3x + 1|_2(3x + 1) = \dfrac{3x + 1}{2^{\nu_2(3x+1)}}$ be the accelerated Collatz function, and we define (this does not match the standard definition) an odd Collatz $n$-loop to be a tuple $(x_0, ...

 
 
1 hour later…
8:38 AM
PSQ with an accepted answer.
PSQ with four upvotes.
 
9:33 AM
This question was likely wrongfully closed due to the author deleting away all context making it look like a PSQ. (I've since rolled it back.) OTOH, since it's not the most interesting or original question, I hesitate to vote to reopen.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:36 AM
@ryang For such questions, we would need the "too-basic"-button.
@user21820 D12 needs a fourth delete-vote. I wonder how this could get such a score. Even for standards of this time, the effort is nonexistent and there is neither other context whatsoever.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:00 PM
@Peter It's gone now, and thank you for your votes!
 
1:55 PM
 
 
4 hours later…
6:08 PM
@ryang Even after your roll-back to the original question, the question was correctly closed.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:09 PM
2
Q: Is $\frac{1}{\zeta(1+it)}$ bounded as $t \rightarrow \infty$?

user697626Let $\zeta$ denote the Riemann zeta function. My question: is $\frac{1}{\zeta(1+it)}$ bounded as $t \rightarrow \infty$ ? The motivation of my question: It seems if the answer is yes, then there exists a sequence of zeros of $\zeta$ whose real parts converge to $1$. Indeed, let $\Theta \leq 1$ b...

 
8:22 PM
needs to be closed for improvement: math.stackexchange.com/q/4387867/29335
@user21820 I think this attitude is akin to making it illegal for someone to get behind the driver's wheel without a license, and forbidding people to get a license without driving practice. I don't want this concept of "a gate of qualification" to exist for providing solutions, and besides, there is nobody to enforce such a gate, and probably no way to detect qualification anyhow. I don't see that the proposed bar solves any problem we have.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in answer, link at end of answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (143): Printer toner coverage‭ by ibmaxjack‭ on math.SE
 
 
1 hour later…
9:49 PM
This question boils down to a question seeking advice, for their final (undergrad) project. Seems to want us to lay the groundwork and tell them what to read, etc. No evidence of any research they've done before asking.
 
@rschwieb It's gone; @Xander added his vote!
@rschwieb Yours as well!
Thanks to our almost-omni-present @Xander :D
 
10:18 PM
What did I do?
Oh. I see. Yeah, they were on the front page. :/
 
@XanderHenderson ;P
Whatever the case, thanks! It just shows you met the standards set my me and @rschwieb ;P
Non question posting as a PSQ. Also note it has an answer. Too many 1K to 90K answerers these days answering vlq questions.
 

« first day (3693 days earlier)      last day (801 days later) »