Background: (required for Collatz novices and maybe well-known by Collatz experimenters)
Let $f(x) = |3x + 1|_2(3x + 1) = \dfrac{3x + 1}{2^{\nu_2(3x+1)}}$ be the accelerated Collatz function, and we define (this does not match the standard definition) an odd Collatz $n$-loop to be a tuple $(x_0, ...
This question was likely wrongfully closed due to the author deleting away all context making it look like a PSQ. (I've since rolled it back.) OTOH, since it's not the most interesting or original question, I hesitate to vote to reopen.
@ryang For such questions, we would need the "too-basic"-button.
@user21820 D12 needs a fourth delete-vote. I wonder how this could get such a score. Even for standards of this time, the effort is nonexistent and there is neither other context whatsoever.
Let $\zeta$ denote the Riemann zeta function. My question: is $\frac{1}{\zeta(1+it)}$ bounded as $t \rightarrow \infty$ ?
The motivation of my question: It seems if the answer is yes, then there exists a sequence of zeros of $\zeta$ whose real parts converge to $1$.
Indeed, let $\Theta \leq 1$ b...
@user21820 I think this attitude is akin to making it illegal for someone to get behind the driver's wheel without a license, and forbidding people to get a license without driving practice. I don't want this concept of "a gate of qualification" to exist for providing solutions, and besides, there is nobody to enforce such a gate, and probably no way to detect qualification anyhow. I don't see that the proposed bar solves any problem we have.
This question boils down to a question seeking advice, for their final (undergrad) project. Seems to want us to lay the groundwork and tell them what to read, etc. No evidence of any research they've done before asking.