12:35 PM
@OliverDiaz In what way have I been partisan here? There is a standard that peer-review and verification of purported proofs of famous open problems are off-topic. I enforced that standard.
@OliverDiaz Pointing out that the question is wrong does not require one to post an answer. One can respectfully point out that the proof is wrong while also believing that the question is not appropriate for Math SE.
Again, the role of Math SE on the internet is not tutoring. It is to build a repository of questions and answers which have lasting value. In what way does a hopelessly naïve attempt at resolving the twin prime conjecture serve future readers?
@OliverDiaz The only person here who seems genuinely angry is you. You are insulting the people who disagree with you, and projecting emotion into those folk. Perhaps you should focus on the merits of the question, rather than your perception of those people who disagree with you?
@TeresaLisbon The problem with the question is not that it fails to meet the context standards. The problem is that it is fundamentally off-topic. It is a request for the community to vet a "proof" of a famous open conjecture. Such questions are fundamentally off-topic.
Finally, let me please remind you all that stars in this room should be used to indicate material which people may want to refer back to in the future. Stars are not for indicating "like".