@amWhy Do you think mods will intervene if I flag such undeletion of PSQs?

@Saad Likely not, though depending on the mod, a few might respond. It is frustrating, indeed. You can find many of these undeletions (or undeletion attempts) in the chatroom "GENTLE".

@amWhy It's surprising that going against the community standard, i.e. undeleting posts that clearly fit the reasons in the closure panel, is not a punishable action.

@Saad The "community standard" is a consensus standard. There are disagreements about the nature of the consensus.

This has been annoying my in all the chat rooms for quite some time now. How can I "go to" a starred comment? The links are listed in the right margin. If I click one, I get to see that comment. BUT NOT IN THE CHATROOM I LOGGED IN. Take amWhy's comment on the top for example. If I click it, a new tab of my browser opens up with that comment clearly visible.

Is there a way to use that link so that clicking it scrolls me to it in the current tab?

More often than not I would like to see the preceding discussion. When the message is a couple of days old, finding it in this tab is a pain.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, +3 more (590): How Does Full Spectrum CBD Oil? by jeremyormier on math.SE

Very fake sounding psq. math.stackexchange.com/q/3723304/29335

Psq, math.stackexchange.com/q/3723314/29335

@XanderHenderson That's exactly why I explained this to be the reasons in the closure panel instead of some other community guide as those reasons are officially recognized by SE.

@JyrkiLahtonen In case it might be interesting for others, I'll just mention that I left a few messages related to this (stars, transcript) in another room. (It would probably be off-topic here.)

del-pls number-theory No Roomba: reopen votes What's the connection between the Heegner numbers and 37?‭ - David‭ 2020-06-13 21:45:22Z

@XanderHenderson Done.

The above was brought up on the Reopen / Undelete thread

@Saad Thanks.

c0607-01, c0607-07, c0610-02, c0610-05, c0610-07,

c0613-07, c0616-02, c0616-04, c0616-06, c0616-07, c0616-08

c0617-01, c0617-02, c0617-03, c0617-04, c0617-05

and

d0613-01, d0613-07,

d0616-01, d0616-02, d0616-03, d0616-05, d0616-12

d0617-01, d0617-02, d0617-03, d0617-04,

d0617-05, d0617-06, d0617-07, d0617-08, d0617-09

Consider closure DP1

@Saad I've asked you twice previously, to not request any more than 12 close, ditto for delete.

And yet today you post 16 of each type of request?? And when I see you overdo such request threads in any given day, I have to be honest: I feel inclined to ignore them ALL.

Please try to pace your postings: up to 12 per day, but if you miss a day, don't flood this chatroom with any more than 12 requests of each type, when you do make requests. Next time you exceed this quota I will delete the last of your comment-requests for each type.

DA, DB, DC, DD, DE, DF, DG, DH

DI, DJ, DK, DL

Thank you @RRL for restricting yourself to suggesting 12 deletions! I voted on them all.

@amWhy: Thanks. I believe @Saad is well-intentioned, but we should all agree on the policy.

@RRL I agree that Saad is entirely well-intentioned.