« first day (2697 days earlier)      last day (2094 days later) » 

00:14
But not to get side-tracked once again:
The missing context is the source of the problem and whether methods like Lagrange modifiers are acceptable or not.
(The latter would usually be given implicitly by mentioning general background, as OP of course cannot be expected to know about what they don't know.)
I don't think that this is asking for all that much. Nothing about failed attempts etc.
 
3 hours later…
 
4 hours later…
07:56
One more incarnation of a basic inequality. Masquerading as a solution verification request, but the answerers treat it as a duplicate, and, particularly the "trusted users", IMO deserve a downvote.
 
3 hours later…
11:07
For anyone interested, robjohn has posted this detailed self-answered Q&A.
2
C1, C2, C3.
C4, C5, C6.
C7, C8, C9.
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.
 
3 hours later…
13:49
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, no whitespace in body, potentially bad keyword in body, repeating characters in body (262): Two symmetrical plots ✏️ by Constantor on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, no whitespace in body, repeating characters in body (261): Find the roots of equation based on some geometry hints ✏️ by Constantor on math.SE
14:16
@user21820 Even worse, C5 is an exact duplicate of this one
 
2 hours later…
17:10
Oi vey...
If you would want to do anything better, you should first stop your massive content destruction by closing and deleting posts on crap reasons, like "unmotivated" and "problem statement". Instead, you should explain your real motives, so you could gain maybe even supporters. Silently closing, deleting posts from the background, without a reasoning or with a crap reasoning, particularly the ones' complaining their deletions... I don't think you could explain it. On other sites, even mods were de-modded for such rampages. — peterh 2 mins ago
@XanderHenderson Exactly. What are you motives?
I explained my motives, @peterh.
The questions are unmotivated and lacking context.
@XanderHenderson Where?
@XanderHenderson I asked your real motives.
@peterh I have explained my "real" motivations. You are choosing to accuse me of lying. I am done talking to you. Goodbye.
2
@XanderHenderson No, I accuse you with power misuse.
@XanderHenderson The false and obviously meaningless "reasons" for this rampage serve only as an excuse for this power misuse. I asked you the motivation for the power misuse.
 
3 hours later…
19:53
This abysmal PSQ has been reopened. It is the subject of previous remarks in CRUDE. Minimize $a+b+c+d$ given $\text{LCM}(a,b,c,d)=1000$‭ - peterh‭ 2018-07-10 18:29:29Z
20:14
For the record, yet another starred post critical of an active CRUDE member has been unstarred (the post above by peterh expressing his opinion that Xander Handerson is misusing his powers) @quid Ytet another example of the extreme bias by the room owners.
Oops, typo, should be "Xander Henderson is misusing his powers"
@peterh See my prior comment. Due to the above it will be impossible to know how your critiques are received here.
@BillDubuque I would not describe it as critical comment, but as an insult. Anyway, I don't think the unstarring is helpful, as your comment shows.
21:09
I will move the above messages to Math Meta Chat. If you want, you can continue the discussion there.
@quid Seriously? Since when is it an "insult" to express the opinion that a CRUDE user is misusing their powers? (as many surely do) Much worse has been said here, e.g. Jyrki's rants calling many prolific teachers rep wh*res motivated by overblown egos. But you didn't call those insults (and they were highly starred). The mind boggles..
22:14
For the record, I have not unstarred anything.
And I do not appreciate the continued unfounded accusations, both from you @BillDubuque, and from peterh.
2
@XanderHenderson Please be more careful - I have not accused you of anything - I merely quoted peterh's remark
@BillDubuque Then what is this, then?
Oh, wait... I apologize.
I did not see that you were correcting your own typo.
@XanderHenderson I spelled your name wrong so as a courtesy I corrected it (some users get really peeved by that - it was not intentional).
The bolded comment "yet another starred post critical of an active CRUDE member has been unstarred" followed by "Oops, typo, should be "Xander Henderson is misusing his powers"" confused me momentarily---I didn't grok the line in between.
Again, apologies.
I appreciate the correction.
@XanderHenderson No problem. Btw the discussion continued in Math Meta Chat. peterh seems to sincerely want to understand the motives of CRUDE users but I couldn't point him to anything written on that. Perhaps you could?
22:19
Yes, I just found that discussion.
Thank you.

« first day (2697 days earlier)      last day (2094 days later) »