« first day (2149 days earlier)      last day (2645 days later) » 

Why
Why
00:08
@SimplyBeautifulArt I downvoted it when it you first posted this (three days ago?), and went backed to check on it, saw it is open for deletion, and cast a delete vote. Two more delete vote and the question will cease to be! (o/)
Per @GabrielRomon's pinned post from Nov. 26, the third remaining question from the user is open for deletion: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2351999/…, as are math.stackexchange.com/questions/2472533/algebra-inequality, and math.stackexchange.com/questions/2537910/…
Why
Why
00:57
One more delete vote needed for this Bare Problem Statement Question
Why
Why
Just trying to update the owners who've demonstrated interest in the chat room, and invested time into it.
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt o/ :D
Why
Why
01:07
@SimplyBeautifulArt copy cat! :P
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt Just tried weeding out room owners. I think having like 14 room owners was a bit over the top!!
@Why Somehow still open for deletion.
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt I know... :-(
@Why The PSQ is still open for deletion.
@Why Deleted.
Why
Why
01:13
@SimplyBeautifulArt Ooh, thanks for pointing that out. I posted when it still needed to be closed. Just cast the third delete vote.
@SimplyBeautifulArt Thanks!
Hello, @JohnMa!
@Why Needs downvotes to delete.
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt Do you like my abbreviated username? I'm still trying to get used to it.
@Why Open for deletion.
@Why lol, it is strange.
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt Great, one more delete vote needed!
Why
Why
01:21
@SimplyBeautifulArt How'd they get this far??? dealt with first three questions
@Why Not too far, saw one that wasn't a PSQ, so maybe it's fine.
@SmokeDetector PSQ to be closed.
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt Problem; still need another delete vote on this question by said user: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2537089/…
@Why Yeah ik, already voted :P
Why
Why
@SimplyBeautifulArt Yeah, I agree.
@SimplyBeautifulArt So did I, :P
@Why Open for deletion
Why
Why
01:29
@SimplyBeautifulArt Yup... each of them needing one more delete vote. thanks for your votes!
01:48
Hot post, I think it should be closed as not a math question.
 
9 hours later…
10:51
in Charcoal HQ, 17 mins ago, by SmokeDetector
fp- by Glorfindel
11:26
@Why Yea I agree; they weren't using the rights anyway. By the way, historically apparently QED was the one who created the room.
@Why Can't help there. The issue is with the PSQ upvoters... =S
@SimplyBeautifulArt I saw it, and didn't vote to close it. It's been stuck at 4 close votes for a long time now.
But I don't really care if it gets closed or not.
@SimplyBeautifulArt @SimplyBeautifulArt: This now can be deleted.
 
3 hours later…
Why
Why
14:46
@user21820 The messages you moved do not belong in the math meta chat room (it had nothing to do with the math meta site), me thinks. It just confuses folks when you arbitrarily move items every which way, because no indication is left at the site of where a comment existed, in the whole scheme of things. Please use a bit more discretion before moving comments where they may not belong, or better yet, consult with another owner of the room, and preferably, if another owner is involved.
@Why The Math Meta chat-room was not intended to be for just the Math Meta site, but anything to do with Math Meta, and the issue with being unable to change username is indeed a Meta issue. Either way, those messages do not belong to CRUDE, but if you like it elsewhere please feel free to move them off from Math Meta.
Why
Why
@user21820 Since when have you become the police-person for CRUDE? It is entirely inappropriate for you to unilaterally determine if something belongs here or not.
15:03
@Why I made the move only after Martin suggested it, with the clear intention of tidying up and the assumption that you would be notified (in your inbox). You are free to tell us that you don't like it, but whether it is inappropriate is not for you to determine either. Anyway I don't wish to argue with you; I feel that you tend to misunderstand a lot of what I say or do. I'm sorry that it's this way; I never intend to annoy you.
Why
Why
@user21820 In fact, I do not "misunderstand" what you say, but it's only when I disagree with a comment you post, or with an action you took, you regularly fall back by pointing the finger at me, as "misunderstanding you". I happen to think that it is you who is impervious to feedback, but you're regularly willing to dish it out. You are not always right, and I wish you'd stop acting like you know better about everything MSE, MSE chat, and MSE meta than any one else.
@Why I don't know better about anything than anyone else. But I do not think it is fair to unilaterally determine that what I do is inappropriate. I'd apologize for any confusion, but I do not agree that it is inappropriate (at the time I did it).
Why
Why
@user21820 Martin asked about whether we should move, or keep, the thread. You took it upon yourself to take action, long before anyone had time to respond. I respect Martin's approach, as I've mentioned: Consult others. As opposed to acting your personal decision that you think they should go, again, without consultation or further discussion. And, of course you think what you say and do is by definition appropriate. That's part of what I addressed: you're impervious to feedback.
Of course, I expect what I've said here to be moved "somewhere else", perhaps you'll even take it upon yourself to move it to trash.
15:18
@Why I simply took it as agreement between two owners that it was off-topic. He explicitly said "It is not related to the topic in this room" and I thought exactly the same even before he came into CRUDE. I did not act unilaterally, contrary to what you have just implied.
To be honest, I think this whole conversation should continue in meta chat room and not here, but whatever.
Exactly as user21820 is saying, we both agreed that messages should be moved elsewhere.
And we were both aware that you should be notified about the move.
So it seems that you are actually blaming user21820 for something which was actually some kind of glitch or bug of the chat system @amWhy.
After all, you are one of the owners of the Math Meta chatroom. If you really think the whole conversation should be here (despite the fact that two other users think otherwise), you can simply move it back.
I really think this whole discussion is in fact a non-issue.
@MartinSleziak This discussion is indeed off-topic in my opinion. If we (including amWhy) agree, I'd like to invite amWhy to choose where to move the whole lot to. If we cannot agree, I'll just leave them. I've no vested interest in anyone's messages or where they go, as long as they are not posted with the intent of causing harm. Sorry for causing the whole debacle. =( =( =(
@user21820 And why can't you say this to me?
@amWhy I at first wanted to reply to you, but felt that it may come across as me repeatedly objecting to you. So I changed to replying to Martin.
Honestly, I get the feeling that I am frequently misunderstood on the internet, not only by you.
And please don't take that as a criticism. It's not your fault even if you misunderstand me. It's just that it seems so.
@MartinSleziak: What should we do now? Sigh.
15:37
Probably just let it be.
The whole conversation is probably interesting only for the few users who took part in it (you, me, amWhy). We know that it is partly here and partly elsewhere.
Re: Sorry for causing the whole debacle. Actually, it was me who suggested that the messages about change of the name should be moved elsewhere: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/41452314#41452314
 
2 hours later…
17:27
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, no whitespace in answer, repeating characters in answer: Designing a Turing machine for Binary Division by alfredo on math.SE
 
1 hour later…
18:48
All three of them are now deleted - revisions/timeline; revisions/timeline, revisions/timeline. Unstarring.
19:09
@amWhy All three of them are now deleted - revisions/timeline; revisions/timeline, revisions/timeline. Unstarring.
Sorry for duplicitous message, I've forgotten to add reply before.

« first day (2149 days earlier)      last day (2645 days later) »