« first day (2077 days earlier)      last day (2417 days later) » 

2:39 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer, username similar to website in answer: A question concerning the Cantor (ternary) function by Abstract Classes on math.SE
 
3:39 AM
According to the room info, this was 1000-th message in this room by SD. Smokie seems to be among the more active users here :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:08 AM
@SimplyBeautifulArt I downvoted it in 2015, and it needs downvotes and deletion. So does this other answer.
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt Why not trying to make the title a bit more descriptive. For example, including something like "using complex numbers I get $\cos 2x=e^2\cos x$. And perhaps adding (complex-numbers) tag? Maybe also (fake-proofs)?
Bumping might either result in somebody noticing it and adding the missing deleted vote. Or - if it is not deleted and it says - it will be marginally more useful now than with the original title.
The above was about this question: Factoring things out of a trig function? New trig. identity??? (I should have used a reply to the previous message, so that it is clear what I am talking about. Sorry.)
I assume that loss of reputation was not the main reason why you wanted to delete it - I have added one upvote, so that if it stays you have $-1$ reputation from that question at the moment. (It is a question which I might upvote if I saw it coming from a relatively new user - the OP obviously tried something and they clearly showed what they have tried. Which is more that many new users do.)
Although I agree that this room was probably best shot to find some users who would vote to delete - since several users who are quite generous with delete votes visit the room.
From the past conversations it seems that there is quite wide range of users' opinions on deletion, ranging from strong inclusionism to strong deletionism, if I may borrow the terminology from Wikipedia.
 
5:45 AM
@MartinSleziak In fact, I would normally leave posts of the sort SBA asked to delete, since it shows some effort. But since he wants it deleted and there's little benefit for others to see it, I've nothing wrong with deleting it. =)
 
 
1 hour later…
6:57 AM
@user21820 Yes, that is rather consistent with the reasons I mentioned for my upvote. (And they are exactly the reasons why I am a bit hesitant to vote to delete - or at least let's call it that I am undecided at the moment.)
I agree that the fact that the OP wants to delete the post has some weight. (Of course, the OP's wishes would be not a sufficient reason in case of a post which is useful and adds valuable content to the site.)
 
@MartinSleziak Yeap agreed.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:00 AM
This poor question should be deleted in my opinion but that would necessitate reopening this better question first. How's that?
 
 
1 hour later…
10:06 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer: Euler's totient function and complex numbers by Rodrigo on math.SE
 
10:53 AM
This question needs one more delete vote. This user has posted like 50 PSQs in just 3 months.
 
 
3 hours later…
@SimplyBeautifulArt: What about those I pinned? =D
 
@user21820 :D Gimme a bit
@user21820 Deleted, leaving star up to you for user + 50 PSQ's
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt I think never mind I took a closer look and it seems users has something like 10%−30% of non-PSQs.
 
Lol, k
@user21820 That might take a while :P
 
 
2 hours later…
4:29 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin body: Is it a a non-singular curve in P^6? by user20107 on math.SE
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-Latin body: Is it a singular curve in P^6 of one node? by Rahul on math.SE
 

« first day (2077 days earlier)      last day (2417 days later) »