« first day (2071 days earlier)      last day (2722 days later) » 

SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
12:05
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Username similar to website in answer: Absolute continuity implies bounded variation by Abstract Classes on math.SE
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
Probably false answer
 
2 hours later…
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
14:19
Probably doesn't answer the question at hand
user12692
15:00
Vote to delete: math.stackexchange.com/q/2423619/9464
user12692
15:42
Vote to delete: math.stackexchange.com/q/2290235/9464
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
Ill-posed question
HNQ PSQ
amWhy
amWhy
@SimplyBeautifulArt I'll wait...for now.
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
15:57
@amWhy sure
amWhy
amWhy
@Jack gone, both.
@SimplyBeautifulArt I voted to put on hold as unclear; The posted "answer" is rather verbose, and could be boiled down to a comment, very easily, and a comment is what it should have been.
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
Yeah, I agree
user12692
16:40
Vote to delete: math.stackexchange.com/q/2285081/9464
user12692
and this: math.stackexchange.com/q/2291950/9464
amWhy
amWhy
17:13
PSQ: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2427702/…
And this one too: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2427878/…
amWhy
amWhy
17:29
And this one too! math.stackexchange.com/questions/2428089/…
amWhy
amWhy
18:03
@Jack Another "double" (both have been deleteded.)
 
1 hour later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
19:10
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, username similar to website in answer: Prove $\mathbb E \lvert x\lvert ^k \leqq (\mathbb E \lvert x\lvert ^k)^{j/k} $ by Dial Bro on math.SE
amWhy
amWhy
@SmokeDetector Nice job, @SmokeDetector
 
3 hours later…
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
22:17
@amWhy Open for deletion
@amWhy Also open for deletion
amWhy
amWhy
23:11
@SimplyBeautifulArt Thanks!
Simply Beautiful Art
Simply Beautiful Art
:)

« first day (2071 days earlier)      last day (2722 days later) »