13:06
4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d99e5/d99e5c7165ce28df4c4465d04c9f27b9f2eb203a" alt="Mathematics Meta"
I think that a separate thread might be a reasonable idea. I feel that we're running close to the end of the current reopen/undelete thread. So having two fresh threads, one for reopening and undeleting, and one for duplicates, should be fine.
Next year, or early 2018, when we run the cycle of t...
For example, should a suggestion to change direction (duplicate target) be included as a possible post in that thread?
I have started a kind of general introduction to the thread here (there is certainly a place to improve):
3 hours later…
15:39
@Martin These should go in the reopen etc thread, Bifurcating such related requests into multiple threads will create too much noise and defeat localization. I will vote to close any such thread as a duplicate of the reopen thread - which it surely is. — Bill Dubuque 3 mins ago
@BillDubuque Dully noted. But this is not the place for discussing this, there is a separate question about this. — Martin Sleziak 5 secs ago
@Martin: All that changed in the past few days was one more vote on my answer and the removal of a bunch of comments from the main question. I doubt the weekend will bring any new blood into this conversation. — Asaf Karagila 3 hours ago
@MartinSleziak Yes, nonsesne prevails on Meta these days. Whats the point of even trying... good luck. — Bill Dubuque 26 secs ago
3 hours later…
18:15
[ SmokeDetector ] Email in answer: Does there exist a function that is differentiable but not integrable? or integrable but not differentiable? by Shubham kumar on
math.stackexchange.com
…
2 hours later…
20:25
That (finite) geometric series question is covered by answers to this (infinite) geometric series question, listed in Meta's List of generalizations of common questions. I have added a comment, but not flagged as duplicate. It might actually be better to add the new Q (with currently 8 answers) to Meta's generalizations list.
20:39
An answer in the generalizations list also links to this (finite, induction) question. Might be good enough for dup-closing, but by now amending the meta list seems to be more appropriate.
« first day (1653 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3137 days later) »