@JyrkiLahtonen If I understand how the LQ queue works, automatic "disputed review" flags are meant to be handled by moderators. I don't see how posting links to those posts (I assume they are answers?) in the room will help. We can't vote "not to delete", only to delete. And if the answer has nonnegative score, we can't vote to delete, either. This has to be a moderator's call.
(The above is written under assumption that you are asking about answers in the LQ queue.)
@Behaviour: Thanks. I guess you're right. On some of those answers I would like to see the expertise of the users enter. I will ask Arthur for more advice (he should be back at the helm today).
@MartinSleziak I was going to propose a change in room name/description to make the purpose more apparent. Unfortunately it seems that the only room owner is QED who doesn't even exist on main site anymore.
Yes. I did not mean my message as a suggestion to add them. (I don't remember whether I saw them in chat.) But, as I explained, they recently mentioned idea of using chat for this purpose.
BTW do you know whether anorton is he on she, @Jyrki? (I see you wrote that you would like to hear from him.)
Hi, all! Responding to questions/comments about me: 1) Sure, I'd love to be a room owner (but that's already been done).
2) Yes, I'm a he (and, yeah, I'm not anonymous at all).
3) I agree that renaming the room could be helpful... the first time I stumbled upon this room, I thought it was actually for some kind of formal jury process on SE. :P (Granted, I was new to the site, but still...)
room topic changed to Reopen? Undelete? Close? Delete?: Sorting things out in cases when the usual review process does not work. [close] [delete] [reopen] [undelete]
room topic changed to Reopen? Undelete? Close? Delete?: Sorting things out when the usual review process does not work. [close] [delete] [reopen] [undelete]