https://github.com/yangofzeal/riemann/blob/main/A%20Refined%20and%20Rigorous%20Approach%20to%20Proving%20the%20Riemann%20Hypothesis%20(1).pdf
(feedback and comments are welcome. Theorem checked with automated theorem provers using Chat-GPT 3.5 and Google Gemini)
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/820927/holomorphic-differentials-on-a-non-singular-curve Suggest edit: In @user729424 's edit (on Apr 8, 2020 at 9:21) changed degP−3 to degP=3, so he changed the minus sign to equal sign. But I think the original minus sign is correct.
the usual machinery here - duplicate is answered by a super-high rep user and this answer (of course!) is upvoted to heaven. This site does not work anymore !
I am 99.9% sure this is extremely wrong but I don't know why.
The functional equation is:
$\zeta(s)=2^s\pi^{1-s}\sin{(\frac{\pi s}{2}})\Gamma(1-s)\zeta(1-s)$
We know that there are trivial zeroes and non-trivial zeroes. The trivial zeroes come from the sin term and I understand why. $\Gamma(1-s)$...
