Hello, @vitamind !

Please delete this answer

One more vote needed: D1, D2, D3, D4, D5

For deletion: D6, D7, D8, D9,

D10, D11, D12

For closure: C1

One downvote left for deletion

@vitamind The output is too few and far between, at least when I compare them to other people who have been suspended. It doesn't mean that a suspension shouldn't occur, but the lack of frequency plays a dampening role.

This is the question that I asked. I want an answer that is based on the approach that I gave. It's not complete so I cannot post the solution on the question linked as a duplicate. I request for reopening of this post. Please no further downvotes for being duplicate since I had used Approach zero but it couldn't find any question.

The linked question does not actually help me. I want a solution that is based on this approach that I gave.

C2

C3, C4

not an answer

Needs one more close vote

@NikhilKumarSingh I don't think there was enough emphasis on the fact that you wanted your approach to be taken by anybody wanting to answer the question. If you can edit this now and make it more clearer than it is, I may at least take a look, if not attempt the question. I don't think I can attempt it anyway.

Thanks, I have edited that question.

Ok, let me take a look.

@NikhilKumarSingh Far better, maybe you might want to push the original integral even further into the background by removing the blockquote. The truth is that you do not want to evaluate that integral , but you want to evaluate the last one. So blockquote and emphasise that last integral, and remove the blockquote from the first integral. Maybe you could say : "I was approaching [original integral] in the following way :" and go. Anyway, I'm convinced, but if people still aren't then you can...

... do this as well.

I have edited the question to emphasize that I want to evaluate the series.

@NikhilKumarSingh It would also help to avoid comments containing complains about a downvote. This happens all the time, to very good questions, and not always they are justified. You currently have a +3-score, no reason to be disappointed.

I improved the score to +4. I see no problems with this question.

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

C7, C8, C9.

C10, C11, C12.

4chan VS cantor...

Psq math.stackexchange.com/q/4195677/29335

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): How did Euler understand e? by SenZen on math.SE

cose

D

@XanderHenderson This clearly off-topic question on programming already had 4 votes for closure before the bounty started. Do you think it OK to take off the bounty status to finish the closure review?

@vitamind Now has some added context , and a self-answer. It's borderline, if not safe from closure.

c

@jasmine Just got deleted, but it's going to come back, probably with an added picture.

okay @TeresaLisbon Maybe

@TeresaLisbon Have you found some factors ?

@Peter No, still running. C195 at 1M.

You are right @TeresaLisbon user come back C

@jasmine But now, there is a source and an attempt, the first part is complete. So do you think we can close? I've asked the user to post the complete link to that exam, so once that is done the question is probably worthy of staying up.

PSQ with two up votes

PSQ

@Saad There's an answer here by a high rep user who should know better. I have downvoted, we can move for deletion.

@Saad Of course it is not. But the moderators are unfortunately the only instance that can do anything. I always hated the bounty-rules. This example show how absurd it is.

Actually ,what exactly is "mathematical programming"? Whatever it is, I'm sure it's well out of the purview of that question. I thought math programming had to do with deeper stuff than just programming the floor and gcd functions.

And one can flag the answer above^3, it's now on -3 votes.

@TeresaLisbon Do you see any chance that a moderator will react in the proper way (migrating the question would be something reasonable) ?

@Saad Please at least downvote this question. I would like to leave a comment , but I do not expect any result.

@Saad It's conspicuous that there have been three questions from ISI (?) during the past few hours (see closed C3 and C4 above).

@Peter I've used up all my votes :/

@Saad I mean all present users.

PSQ

@TeresaLisbon I think user should be asked question separately.@Saad Also,I Think ISI exam is coming up .

A few more votes to vote this duplicate

Please consider closing/deletion of this

@JitendraSingh open for deletion

D

D

c

Can this be solved at all ?

@Peter Why not? It's a cubic in √x. It's also closed in SE. =)

@jasmine Closed.

@jasmine Closed.

@user21820 In fact it is a quartic that could be solved with an extremely complicated expression (if $m$ is not known)

@TeresaLisbon 110 Curves with B1 = 22M revealed no factor of C195

@Peter Oops, don't know how I thought the square would become a cube hahaha..

@Peter Oh dear, it seems we will have to go further.

PSQ

@jasmine Ok, although that is ISI 2020's exam paper which is publicly available. So I don't think cheating applies, but there was a flood of ISI-related questions, so perhaps this was closed as a result of that stream coming in all at once. I actually don't think it's a bad question, although it is probably a duplicate as well.

@Peter On migration, not so sure. I think it's too elementary to be passed into any coding forum on stackexchange without being a duplicate. I'm not a programming buff, so I know the minute this question came through that it would be a duplicate elsewhere, if in parts.

@Peter gone

@Peter gone.

@TeresaLisbon But here it is definitely off-topic.

@Peter Without a doubt. I don't know where it can migrate, but I know we can close it once the bounty expires.

@TeresaLisbon Who will win the final ?

@Peter Italy!

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with a link in answer, link at end of answer, pattern-matching website in answer (219): A small-appliance manufacturer has plants in Baltimore and Philadelphia, each of which produces toasters and blenders. by Myra on math.SE

Please close this question

Please close this question

Please close this question Even if there is an attempt present, it's all in links, and lastly I believe it's a dupe as well.

This is a duplicate

Please close this question

Please close this question

Since when has math.se been a site to ask about vocabulary or usage? further vs. farther

^^^ Certainly it is for mathematical terminology...but....

C

This question and answer are both inappropriate.

Hello, @questionasker !

Darn, I can't figure out these links.