2:04 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, repeating characters in answer, toxic answer detected (239): Can any Polynomial be factored into the product of Linear expressions? by sdadsadasd on math.SE

5 hours later…
6:56 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, blacklisted website in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, +1 more (261): Mistake in plato.stanford.edu/entries/type-theory/#2 by alishainardo on math.SE

1 hour later…
8:00 AM
@rschwieb You need to be nice and quit trying to start problems in chat.

8:50 AM
Unusual discussions there: On the surface of the sphere, if two points are moving east, are their trajectories not parallel?. I have voted to close, but maybe moderators should take a look.

@JoséCarlosSantos: Regarding your comment here: Questions are not put “on hold” anymore but “closed” directly. The template at math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/9407/42969 has been updated accordingly.

9:11 AM
@MartinR Thank you. I will take that into account.

3 hours later…
11:44 AM
@user64742 I did say I was done. And don’t worry, despite what you might think looking at this single instance, you’ll see the pattern I’m highlighting over time.

2 hours later…
1:26 PM
@rschwieb I see you trying to antagonize Bill. I don’t believe this is the first time I’ve seen you do that. I may be mistaken. Still, please refrain.

2:14 PM
@user64742 I welcome your oversight! good day...

3 hours later…
5:44 PM
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.

6:23 PM
@rschwieb Please stop making ad hominem insinuations that are based only upon your imagination. The volume of your unfounded ad hominem attacks on your political opponents far exceed anything I've ever seen anywhere in the many decades I've been on the net. That should give you pause.

6:47 PM
A meta issue worth highlighting. Many regulars here claim this room is welcoming to everyone. The above shows how wrong this view is. The above unfounded ad hominem attacks have apparently sparked a downvoting spree on my answers. There were 5 downvotes placed over that period, in sets of two spaced 10 seconds apart (normally it takes months to get that many).
The downvotes were not placed on "extreme presebtation style" answers but rather, apparently, to send some sort of message (e.g. one was the first downvote ever (1/330) on an inactive 10-year old highest-voted answer). What message is intended is anyone's guess. The actions are certainly not constructive. Such are the detriments of gamification.
I hope that the room owners will work better to prevent such ad hominem attacks and promote better understanding. If there is any hope at all that this site will flourish once again it is through better understanding - not stronger attacks.
And, btw, the unstarring of critical comments is once again happening, sigh. Some things never change...

7:22 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in body, repeating characters in body, repeating characters in title, blacklisted user (301): Clash of Clans is POOP 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩 by Julian Tiemann on math.SE

2 hours later…
9:34 PM
The question $\frac{x^2}{y+z}+\frac{y^2}{x+z}+\frac{z^2}{x+y} \ge \frac{1}{2}(x+y+z)$ was closed as a duplicate of If $x,y,z\gt 0$ and $xyz=1$ Then minimum value of $\frac{x^2}{y+z}+\frac{y^2}{z+x}+\frac{z^2}{x+y}$. However, the constraint under which the expression is to be minimized is different in those questions.
The former (newer) question might be lacking context, but is is not a duplicate of the latter (older) question.