Possibly close this question as a dupe of this newer question which encompasses the previous question and more?

ouch

nvm I forgot that I have the calculus dupe hammer...

For deletion: D1, D2

For closure: PSQ

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (161): Function Transformations - how do I find the invariant points? by lara on math.SE

@SimplyBeautifulArt The older question asks for a construction by “elementary functions, or by integral formula ...” and is answered in the negative. Your answer to the newer question is positive. Are the answers to the older question wrong? Or does your answer use more operations than the above mentioned? In the latter case, it would not be a duplicate. – (I am not an expert on this topic, so I might be overlooking something obvious.)

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly dots in answer (34): geometric interpretation of Taylor's theorem by Sean Cobb on math.SE

@MartinR my series is by no means elementary :P

Well

Whoops

@SimplyBeautifulArt Then it is not a duplicate.

@SimplyBeautifulArt Roughly speaking, the older question asks for “elementary functions” and the newer question for “piecewise elementary functions.” If the answer for the newer question were “NO” as well then one could consider it as generalization and close the older one as a duplicate. But actually you link back to the older answer, and then provide a construction with is neither “elementary” nor “piecewise elementary.”

I would suggest to reopen the older question (which has good answers which actually answer the question).

For deletion: d1, d2, d3

@Saad All deleted.

G'morning/(oops) G'afternoon! @quid!

Hello! I had just been stopping by briefly.

@ArnaudD. Thanks!

c1

d4

PSQ with 4 answers in 15 minutes post submission.

@Saad I didn't do anything actually, I just wanted to signal that it was done for others :p

@Saad gone (d1-d4).

Another PSQ, in need of closure.

NCWQ: "No context whatsoever question".

NCWQ?

@Holo Did you read what is written in the quotation marks?

@amWhy Sorry, for some reason this last few days I can't finish a full sentence :/

@Holo :-) I've had days like that too!

@amWhy First PSQ closed now

@RRL Thanks!

@amWhy The PSQ is gone. The NCWQ doesn't deserve to be described like that anymore, but I think that it is still a very poor question. What do you think?

@JoséCarlosSantos I agree with you.

@amWhy It is no longer fitting to describe this question as a NCQ; however, the question remains poor. Perhaps a helpful comment describing to the asker how to further improve the question is appropriate. The asker seems to be responsive to feedback. That's a big plus!

delete 1, 2, 3

delete 4, 5, 6

delete 7, 8, 9

delete 10, 11, 12

@Lord_Farin 1-6 inclusive are now gone.

Wow, that's fast.

Note that we managed to close the gap: the "focused attention query" is now emptied except for the daily influx!

@Lord_Farin Only 11 and 12 remain, each in need of only one more delete vote.

@Lord_Farin Awesome accomplishment!

delete Last year's crap

@Lord_Farin ^ Proposal of what we could take on next @amWhy @Saad @RRL @JoséCarlosSantos @Did

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] No whitespace in title (61): ihfeokdwbvkjdbvkjdsbvjkbdsvjkbdjkv ✏️ by nipohc88 on math.SE

Sometimes you just encounter titles like... "Hard advance level question on number"

Maybe I need a break.

@Lord_Farin I "feel your pain" too!

@Lord_Farin Open for deletion from 20K+ users. It seems I've already used up my delete votes for today :(

@AlexanderGruber Thanks for the deletion!

@amWhy what an awful question

@AlexanderGruber Indeed!!

closureContest-question-PSQ's (two in one post) by a >6K rep user. (And answered by the expected user when PSQ inequality questions are asked)

@AlexanderGruber If you're around, anytime soon, please review the question linked immediately above.

@amWhy Downvoted and voted to delete.

@JoséCarlosSantos Thanks!