@Holo I made this minor edit merely in order to bump this meta question. Instead of making malicious guess about others' thoughts, why not gathering enough evidence first to judge others?

@XanderHenderson Maybe using bold face is entirely polite? I don't know where comes this "entirely" thing.

Please make edits to improve posts, not to bump them. Thanks!

@user302797 You were not pingable, hence there was no way to know your motivation nor to ask you about it. That being said, I don't see anyone "judging" you; just speculating about your motivations.

@user302797 I don't follow what you are saying here. Are you objecting to the fact that I emphasized the fact that one of the three changes you made was actually incorrect?

@XanderHenderson Why using bold face as in wrong?

@user302797 Bold face is for emphasis. amWhy objected to the fact that the edit was trivial; I objected to the fact that it was not only trivial, but incorrect (you capitalized the first letter of a word following a colon; this was a grammatically incorrect edit).

The only other edits you made were to remove contractions, which are a matter of style, and were entirely appropriate in the original version of the question.

As to @Holo's comment, he was suggesting that it is rude to bump old questions via trivial edits. As stated above by @MikeMiller, edits are for improving questions, not bumping them.

NCQs: 1, 2, 3,

4, 5, 6.

7, 8, 9.

@user21820 I thought 5 and 8 were posted by the same user.

@Saad Um yea? You agree that both are poor questions, right?

no-context-questions, to be precise.

@user21820 I have no objection to that. I was wondering why this person created two accounts, both of which have 2k+ rep.

@Saad Oh they are different accounts? I totally didn't notice!! Time to inform @quid and @AlexanderGruber.

Multiple accounts are not in themselves against the rules, unless one is used to vote on posts by the other.

Or to circumvent suspension.

PSQ(math.stackexchange.com/questions/3047315/…)

Low quality question

@DevashishKaushik It's been edited before the answers were posted. Though it's still poor, it's likely a new user who is trying.

@DevashishKaushik Voted to close.

@user21820 I saw the edit, but still seems very LQ to me.

@DevashishKaushik Agreed.

It is certainly possible that this particular user tried genuinely but Problem Statement I want answer XX. I tried - <Multiply some stuff> = YY seems to have pretty much become a standard template to post such things.

Definitely if there is a pattern then it's bad.

@DevashishKaushik Accurate description of the phenomenon.

@DevashishKaushik Indeed. :-(

@XanderHenderson What's wrong with the capital? It's a sentence following a colon, so requires a capital surely?

@user334732 No. It is not a sentence following a colon; a colon does not end a sentence. It is part of the previous sentence, and should not be capitalized.

@XanderHenderson you learn something every day.

@Did @amWhy @XanderHenderson @MikeMiller: Not about mathematics (similar flavour to this).

Not about math, PSQ, clueless.

You comment here is spot on, @XanderHenderson

For deletion (sorry, I failed to link to two of the three PSQ's I intended to link. immediately above): Z, Y, X.

→ 1 message moved to ­Trash

@AlexanderGruber. I am anxious to see the next step with this question. I don't want to be a bother or rush you or anything like that but I hope you'll ping me if/when you decide to do something with it.

@Mason if it's about MO, I'd recommend to just ask it there if you want, with a link and maybe slightly modified. Migration is not all that useful.

The last comment is a general remark.

Most of the time a delayed and linked cross-post is better.

Bonus points for keeping the other version up to date.

Man. I wish I would have known this earlier.

@quid. Thanks.

I asked that question a while back here in Crude but heard only crickets so I ended up flagging it and asking for input.

@AlexanderGruber. Done

@quid. Done.