« first day (2473 days earlier)      last day (2024 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@Holo thanks for the back up on the duplicate lol. I was at dinner.
 
@RushabhMehta Haha, no problems :), I got annoyed seeing them replying without understanding what they are talking about. Btw, I didn't flag that comment because I think it is up to you, if you think this comment should go I will flag it
 
@Holo I'm not sure. I don't think he's malicious, he just reminds me of those kids on that /iamverysmart subreddit.
@Holo I also get annoyed when people find obviously flawed things to be "discoveries", but I guess it's natural.
 
@RushabhMehta if so I won't flag it for now
 
@Holo Also, take a look at his question record.
I'm gonna invite him into the general convo to discuss
 
@RushabhMehta maybe it is natural but don't they think that people tried things in the past? A good question can be: "did people tried this, if so what are the results?" not "I created this, this is a thing 'cause I said so" :P
 
12:13 AM
@Holo agreed. Removing the pretentiousness makes me more willing to help.
 
1:39 AM
The hell @RushabhMehta ... Wow
I have so many things to say to that OP...
 
@Holo Yea I found that by looking at the question history of someone who posted a PSQ in MSE
 
This post is just saying (1)=what I want and thus...
 
@Holo I legit was staring at it for 10 minutes laughing
 
@RushabhMehta I'm still unsure how to react... Sad? Amused? Mad? Lol
 
@Holo idk either. It's memey 4 sure
 
1:57 AM
Indeed
 
 
12 hours later…
1:42 PM
d1, d2, d3, d3'.
d4, d5, d6.
d7, c1, c2.
 
1:58 PM
d8, d9, d10.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:21 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] No whitespace in title, repeating characters in body, repeating characters in title (207): ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ✏️ by Alireza Esmailzehi on math.SE
 
@SmokeDetector Good bot
 
 
2 hours later…
6:16 PM
Helloo. What to do if OP changed the question after someone else posted an answer to the first version? Now the answer has no sense
 
@Isah Post a comment to the question that if they have another question they should post this at a different post. Also you can flag a mod
You can also send to here a link, if this is very bad I can roll it back
(Although I prefer that the OP will roll the question back by themselves)
 
ok, someone else asked OP why did he change it, but OP didn't answer
@Holo the question is \2954642 question
 
@Isah are you talking about 2x vs x?
 
@Holo no, it was x=1/2 and OP modified to x=2
that changes the answer completely
 
@Isah I will edit it back to the original
 
6:28 PM
ah ok, mmh but I flagged it already
 
@Isah it is okay, I changed it to 2x and to x=1/2. The mods can see my edit
 
Did you roll back the edit, @Holo? That's the best way to "undo" a question alteration after receiving an answer.
 
yes that one was another change the x by 2x..
 
@amWhy I justed changed 2 into 1/2 and x into 2x like it was in the original question :)
 
@Holo It's just a lot easier to document when it's done through "roll-backing" an edit. You assure you revert the edit to it's pre-edit state. Here, there wasn't much edited. The asker probably carelessly wrote the problem incorrectly, but once answered, tough for them. Isah: it was good to flag! The question is as it should be, and three users support you. You likely are not the only flag. Flagging here was probably the best course of action.
 
6:42 PM
ok I retracted the flag now :) Thank you
 
7:35 PM
@Isah You could have kept it. When I said flagging "here" I meant flagging the post for moderator attention being the best course of action. No matter now. But that move was spot on (to flag) when you see that happen in the future.
 
7:46 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in title, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (100): A question of arithmetic regarding erection cost of a structure. by math maniac. on math.SE
fp feedback on autoflagged post: A question of arithmetic regarding erection cost of a structure. MS (@ArtOfCode @ByteCommander @quartata @CalvT @WELZ @Hexaholic)
 
@SmokeDetector Not a good question, Smokey, but "erection" isn't a dirty word.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:47 PM
ok @amWhy, I'll keep in mind next time:)
 
@Isah Glad you brought it up here to, though!! Stop by, anytime!
 
@XanderHenderson Indeed!
 
10:44 PM
@gimusi Why answer the question if you don't know what it even means? Wouldn't it be better to first ask for clarification, and then, once you have that clarification, answer the question? — Xander Henderson 12 secs ago
 
11:02 PM
Ugh...
@XanderHenderson It seems that my guess was right! Please try to be not so skeptic and relentless with the askers and with who try to help them to clarify their doubts. If my answer was not fitting the asker needing of course I would have deleted that by myself. As I explained before, I was sure of his doubt at the moment I've answered and then I've asked a question to sollicit a confirmation by the asker. Anyway thanks for your suggestion, I understand that you try to act for the benefit of the community but please try also to consider some friendly suggestion from other users! Bye — gimusi 42 secs ago
THAT'S NOT THE POINT!
 

« first day (2473 days earlier)      last day (2024 days later) »