@SmokeDetector I have asked this on meta.SE: What is the right place to ask questions about the SmokeDetector?

@MartinSleziak Sorry I neglected this room for a while. The right place would be the Charcoal HQ chatroom:

@NajibIdrissi reopened

@MartinSleziak Generally, it means that the user previously posted something that was confirmed as a harmful post. In this case, it means someone fat-fingered their response to a SmokeDetector post.

(Blacklisting Georges Elencwajg was an obvious error, which was corrected before I saw this message.)

Thanks for the reply @Normal! In any case, I think that meta.SO post might be useful for other users too, so it is good that it was posted. (So far there is one answer, Awesome Poodles suggested the same room and mentioned also some other possibilities.)

BTW in my message above I wanted to link to link to this and not to this. I.e., I wanted to reply to this message:

I should check my messages in chat while they still can be edited. (Is the grace period in chat 3 minutes?)

2 minutes.

Now I found in SmokeDetector wiki that there is a command why which "Shows the reason that SmokeDetector caught a post. Note that why data is only kept for the last 50 reports."

To use it, I just reply the SomkeDector post with the reply containing nothing else, only the commend why, is that correct?

In principle, yes. But it will not work in this room, because SmokeDetector does not listen to this room.

Listening requires maintaining a separate websocket connection for each such room. At present, the only rooms where SD listens are Charcoal HQ, The Tavern on meta.se, and SOCVR on meta.SO. One on each chat server.

I have tried it here.

Thanks for the explanation that it only works in some rooms.

[ SmokeDetector ] Few unique characters in answer: Prove that these 3 points are in a straight line. by mathsgenius on math.stackexchange.com

[ SmokeDetector ] Manually reported answer: How many three digit number can be formed? by bubba shortcake on math.stackexchange.com

anyone here?

Yes. What's up?

reopen How are partial derivatives in multivariable calculus different from the ordinary derivative?