« first day (5055 days earlier)      last day (93 days later) » 

06:11
@Criggie you are too humble 😊😊
06:54
-beam-
yeah nah, I'm no fast or powerful cyclist.
but leverage is a great equaliser :)
 
2 hours later…
09:11
a heavy cyclist is usually also a powerful cyclist
10:00
heh I am one of those things :)
10:54
Those track racers have very large chain rings. With a small ring you will have so much more mechanical advantage that a week cyclist can exert more force pulling the wheel forward. Especially a heavy cyclist just standing on the pedal. (But that is usually still enough for track ends that are in good shape.)
@Sam7919 aligning rear wheel with track ends is pretty easy. You get your rought chain tension, tighten the left nut a bit. Then set exactly the right chain tension on the right side and tighten the nut full down. Finally release the right nut a bit, adjust wheel for good tracking and alignment and tighten it again. Takes about 20s after the third time doing it.
Those chain tensioners on some bikes are more finicky though. I through them out on my bike because of that. Aligning with a QR takes a little more dexterity cause you close both sides at the same time.
I have a QR axle where I filed one side flat. By positioning the flat face forward or aft, I can change chain tension a bit. But that takes a little practice aligning right.
 
5 hours later…
16:26
A heavy cyclist standing on a pedal in a low gear ration produces a lot of torque to spin the wheel around its axle. Does that also necessarily create to a translational force that would pull the axle forward?
(it's been so long since I've really thought about this kind of mechanics -- i do sediment and water)
 
3 hours later…
19:46
Yes. If the dropout has any space for movement fore/aft then the chain is continually tying to pull the axle forward.
Thats why nuts/QRs etc have serrations
20:15
@PaulH yes the chain force is there :)

« first day (5055 days earlier)      last day (93 days later) »