last day (1061 days later) » 

5:03 PM
Welcome to chat for: Music Fans
This is a general discussion room, but please feel free to create more subject-specific rooms (a single room with every possible discussion isn't very helpful)
For playing with chat features:

Sandbox

Where you can play with chat features (except flagging) and ch...
and remember; please read the FAQ ;p)
 
Dom
Hello Music Fan's chat.
 
5:16 PM
Hello!
 
Dom
If you guys have any ideas for a name of this chat post it here:
0
Q: Let's name our chat room

DomLet's get things rolling in making this site our own and name our chat room. Post your suggestions below and be sure to vote on your favorite.

 
5:59 PM
Already posted my suggestion.
 
6:18 PM
Hello!!
 
Dom
@Unihedro Hi how's it going?
 
Very nice to see you, it's been well, thanks!
Allow me to promote a room full of links to tracks:

 JamExchange FM39.426

Featuring DJ Caprica. Room player: gist.github.com/CS1000/4553...
 
6:37 PM
@Unihedro lol
interesting site
why is the meta site not https?
 
Because the SE certificate is *.stackexchange.com.
meta.musicfans is not recognized as a host on the domain.
I like the idea of originality, but "Music Fans" is no fun. At least "The Music Fans Of Awesomeness". — Unihedro 3 mins ago
Support my proposal of naming this chat room The Music Fans Of Awesomeness!!
 
7:32 PM
@Unihedro sounds like a name I would make when I was 8 :P
 
7:46 PM
@ZachSaucier Or by Jack Black.
 
8:35 PM
-2
Q: Music Review Parameters

Noach mi FrankfurtConsidering that we are a community of music fans, critics, and so forth, it seems logical to discuss the parameters for music reviews. What are the guidelines for different media of reviews as they pertain to music, in particular, the written review? Does the manner in which one reviews differ...

I move to return this to the main site, where it seems on-topic, rather than in meta, where it is clearly not.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:31 PM
@NoachmiFrankfurt to be honest, it's a very poor, open ended question
it depends fully on what type of review, the audience reading, and the purpose behind it
as such, I voted to close because I don't think it's worth having on the site
 

  last day (1061 days later) »