« first day (2040 days earlier)      last day (2944 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

4:04 PM
walk away from an argument while you still can?
 
we don't want people to try to improve the site any more?
what do you think about the subject?
 
Quit trying to put shog on the spot.
 
???
ffs.
 
being put on the spot is kind of his job
 
4:10 PM
I'm asking a simple question
 
you have to admit that question contains a bit of straw
 
"what do you think about the subject?" contains straw?
 
crap, I started yet another tangent argument
 
He's not going to comment if he doesn't want to. You have all types, some types are going to put half-decent (if short) answers in the comments, and there's nothing you can do about it, except remind them that answers go in the Answers.
 
that's nonsense
people do all sorts of things wrong
and when those things have been officially decided to be wrong
we have processes to try to stop those people doing the wrong things
 
4:12 PM
There's just some things you can't control. I'm thinking this is one of them.
 
are those processes perfect? no. is that within the scope of deciding whether a thing is wrong? also no
then the site is doomed
it's Q&A not Q&C
literally the purpose of SE's creation
 
You're being hysterical. Snap out of it.
 
technically it's now Q&A&M&C&J&D
 
I'm blocking you for a while, Aaron. You're not being helpful in the slightest. You're just being kinda rude.
 
4:13 PM
(if it's not obvious: questions, answers, meta, chat, jobs, documentation)
 
@Ixrec don't forget TV?
 
SE has a TV channel???
 
not sure what happened to it but it was proposed
614
Q: An experiment: Stack Overflow TV

Matt ShermanStack Overflow is beginning an experiment called Stack Overflow TV, or SOTV for short. It will be a series of fast, smart videos for experienced programmers who want to learn a new thing. The videos will serve as a complement to Stack’s Q&A, and are intended for that community. Of course, they w...

 
Yeah, they were going to fly people to NYC.
or something
 
enjoy the comments!
 
4:14 PM
TIL
 
incidentally, one of the answers contains this from a CM:
> In 2008, Stack Overflow was a new idea, and a great idea - there was nothing that existed where:
>
> - I could actually edit things to improve them
> - I didn't have to scroll through 40 pages of 'me too' just to find a broken link that everyone was raving about
> - Questions I asked didn't get side tracked (or outright hijacked) with tangentially related bike shed painting
> - The best stuff actually rose to the top! - and that was magic. Why hadn't anyone thought of that before?
RIP to that.
 
-2
A: Answers in comments, revisited

Aaron HallI agree with you, sometimes the direct answer pops out in a comment, but there's nothing to be done about it except to write up the answer and flesh it out. (When I comment "Answers go in the answers" the response is usually agreement, but they didn't have the time to risk putting out content tha...

 
Thanks DS, you have a thought about that?
 
I like that most of the answers are hating on the tv thing
 
One day I'll master the meta answer. Today isn't that day.
But it was nice to kick off the answers.
 
4:17 PM
Just lurking doing my last upvote/downvotes until my support reads my little message thing
Hey, guys, answers go in the Answers. — Aaron Hall 23 hours ago
+1
 
I was quite pleased with that one.
enjoys the rare opportunity to be smug and self-satisfied
I'm reading up on DDOS attacks and defending against them.
 
I am reminded of -- have I ever told the story of Commentgate?
 
Get a VPN
-17
Q: Introduce flags for comments that half-answer a question

BarryTheHatchetComments are just for requesting clarification and arguing with people, right? ;) Yet lately I'm seeing this more and more often (no data available; sorry to pick you specifically, Barry): What happens is that someone FGITWs a mini-answer as a comment on the question, diluting the value of th...

Looks like your first question failed... Good luck on this one (even thought I just watched another downvote)
 
@KitZ.Fox I haven't heard this story, do tell
 
There is at least on CM who is very against deleting comments that answer the question. This CM is not one that is usually involved with our site.
About two years ago, he was reading a HNQ for EL&U and deleted at least one comment that he felt was an answer and therefore warranted deletion.
 
4:27 PM
That's a total contradiction..
 
Well, it happened to be written by a high rep user who then posted on Meta, accusing the mods and me in particular of deleting his incredibly valuable content.
 
everyone knows that comments are subject to deletion at any time.
 
And he threw a huge tantrum and there was a stand off and everything.
 
I'm guilty of often answering via comments
 
Stand off? tut-tut
 
4:29 PM
Keep in mind that this was probably commentgate #7 or something. He certainly wasn't the first user to get miffed about having a comment removed.
It also wasn't the first time he had a tantrum about it.
 
I'm guilty of writing up a comment answer or two as a regular answer.
Only can think of one time where it was something I didn't already know.
 
"Why was my comment removed?" is one of the few questions that's a FAQ on every meta
nobody seems to understand comments
 
So then Grace had a talk with me and I went walkabout for a while.
 
I don't like having comments removed if they're a discussion that's still ongoing, or when only one side was removed, but okay fair enough it should have been in a chatroom
OR AN ANSWER lol...
 
I think I understand comments.
 
4:30 PM
I don't get why this is hard
 
He refused to believe that I had nothing to do with it.
 
Was he Kitbashing?
 
He also refused to believe that I didn't care about his comment.
 
I think SO's position is going to be: "Flags are for really bad urgent things - and this, while important, is less of a priority."
 
@BarryTheHatchet Ah, drama. He was another one of the many who doesn't seem to understand the definition of "passive-aggressive" and bandies it about in an ironic fashion.
 
4:33 PM
@AaronHall most of the existing comment flag reasons are very non-urgent
 
@KitZ.Fox lol, now that's passive aggressive
 
chatty is urgent because of the volume.
 
if they say "we won't give you a flag reason because it's not important enough" then fine I have to live with that
but I'd at least like them to say "yes you're right this trend is daft and we don't want people to do it"
so I can then link to that declaration in the future
 
@BarryTheHatchet You can judge for yourself.
 
OR if they say "no this trend is fine we encourage it" then I can shake my head and move on ... with protest
 
4:34 PM
there is an "other" with a text box - so you already have what you want.
 
You could try a custom flag and say that the comment offends your sensibilities.
 
hah, ELU. should've known
 
@AaronHall custom flags are not really "blank check" flags, the mod has to agree that whatever you're flagging is a bad thing
 
I notice that guy's used >> to create a double-bordered box for a section heading
 
so without a clear community consensus for the mods to enforce "you can use a custom flag" is not a solution
 
4:36 PM
i.e. formatting abuse
@Ixrec exactly
I'm not going to risk obliterating my flag weight by flagging before there's an agreement that I'm right
(which I am :P)
although I do occasionally use "Obsolete" for this when I'm really frustrated :)
and in totally clearcut cases (real answers literally dupe of comments)
> After reviewing some of the answers to this question, especially those which attempt to draw distinctions between what is and is not a "useful" comment (some related at great length and with a form of special pleading one normally might associate with legal briefs from the tobacco lobby), I have to say I still am unable to fathom the difference.
Wow, you weren't kidding @Kit
 
Well. The one he posted when he rage-quit after I returned was more interesting, but you need 10K rep to read it.
 
Well, so what we need is a clear statement of policy - redundant answers in the comments should be flagged for removal by mods. Otherwise, write it up, then flag it for removal.
I do like that idea
 
@AaronHall I like that plan.
 
redundant comment answers should be very easy to agree on
 
We had someone doing that on EL&U, but some users got pissed because he was cribbing other users' "answers".
 
4:40 PM
it's the regular comment answers that people have bizarrely strong and illogical feelings about
 
@KitZ.Fox aww
wow, 20GB of unused Docker images
 
updated my answer to suggest it
 
andddd they're on the wrong partition so I ran out of disk space on our shiny new server. whoops
 
Docker like the pants?
 
4:42 PM
20GB of unused pants images. considers UK context that's even funnier.
 
ugh who set this up
2TB on /home 50GB for everything else
but I don't want Docker images stored under /home
 
Where do you want them?
 
Oh, also, it's more fun if you read the edit history @Barry.
 
oooh
heh
a 111k user, too. :smh:
I'm hungry.
-6
Q: Is a loop containing over 250,000 iterations considered slow?

Samiul Islam SamiQuestion: In any programming language, are loops with more than 250,000 iterations considered slow. Yes. No. A specific class of programming language has this problem.

 
@BarryTheHatchet what we want and what we can force people to do are entirely separate.
2
 
4:53 PM
@Shog9 I agree.
I'm asking what you want.
 
There's a lot of low-hanging fruit here, questions that can be answered by folks who have some reasonable knowledge of the topic and can vet and post an answer provided as a hint or skeleton in the comments.
 
That's what I said! :)
 
But... If no one cares, we can't make it happen.
 
I think the hypothesis that "no one cares" has been well disproven by now.
We don't want spam, so spam is banned, and that is enforced. Clearly you can force a lot of things!
I don't know where this idea has come from all of a sudden that SE is necessarily an anarchy.
 
In an individual case, where an answer is provided in a comment and the question is ignored henceforth... It's arguable that no one cares. Heck, the system will happily delete some of these questions.
 
4:55 PM
priorities...
 
I would love to encourage more answering in some way; aging out or archiving comments, providing something of a wiki that folks could expand on as they had time, perhaps even auto-bountying these based on heuristics...
But, first I'd want to do some research to see how many cases exist where an answer clearly exists, is clearly of interest to others, and yet hasn't made it into a bonafide answer as of yet.
 
So you fundamentally agree that having answers as answers is a worthy goal?
 
'cause... My suspicion is that a decent number of these are the sort of ultra-specific questions where the answer isn't particularly useful to anyone other than the asker at one moment in time. IOW, the stuff Too Localized was originally aimed at, back when that existed and no one knew what it meant or used it that way.
yes, having answers is sorta the entire point of running these sites
 
I like fruit.
 
I like waffles
 
4:58 PM
 
Waffles are good too.
 
I like turtles.
 
Bacon waffles are surprisingly disappointing.
 
@Shog9 At this point, the mere confirmation of this idea means a lot to me. It seems like that's not the general consensus any more.
 
4:59 PM
Bacon is usually best cooked separate from what it is combined with, then combined
 
Baking salmon on top of bacon is great
 
user15026
@Shog9 this.
 
The drippings can then be used to flavor in interesting ways, while the bacon itself is allowed to get crispy
 
ew crispy bacon
 
@Shog9 Yes, I agree.
 
5:00 PM
I'm helping
 
The exception I'll make there is burgers, where I grind the bacon in with the beef and cook them together
 
user15026
Yeah, if you go with adding raw bacon to a food you usually get sad limp bacon.
 
this is what bacon should look like!
 
wtf? You're Canadian?
 
Still, the usual technique of attempting to cook bacon on top of patties is lame; it produces stringy bacon and greasy burgers
 
5:00 PM
this is terrible bacon:
80% fat and burnt to a crisp. Shame!
 
@BarryTheHatchet that looks suspiciously like chicken
@BarryTheHatchet not burnt, fried
 
burnt in a fryer
 
user15026
Nah, peameal bacon and bacon bacon are different. I like them for difference reasons.
 
and that 80% fat means you can render off plenty of drippings to flavor other things
 
Hi Shog. I'm almost done with your hat, now that the season is over. Your head will be the same size next year probably, right?
 
5:02 PM
just terrible! all that fat! ew!
 
Uncured bacon is really tasty.
 
user15026
@Shog9 like making sawmill gravy with the bacon fat and then putting that on things. I find that quite delicious
 
see, again, trying to cook them together
 
5:02 PM
yeahhhh now we're talking
dangit, need bacon now
bbiab :D
 
eggs cook in like 40 seconds in a big pool of bacon grease. So, cook the bacon first, slow and careful to render off plenty of fat, and then use that grease to cook the eggs & serve while everything's still hot
 
user15026
@Shog9 yes. That sounds about perfect.
 
lol now I'm getting downvoted for putting my answer in the answer section
things are getting out of control up in this gaff
let's delete all users other than me and start again
 
ok, I have an appointment I need to get to; I'll catch up on all this later
 
And then make your pancakes on them.
 
5:05 PM
waffles
 
No, waffles go in an iron.
Bacon and pancakes on a griddle.
 
Will they lend to the unemployed? — verve yesterday
 
you can totally cook bacon on a waffle iron
 
^ OP after asking how to persuade a bank to lend him money because he ran out because he maxed out his credit cards
@KitZ.Fox No, waffles go in the answer section!!!
 
@KitZ.Fox unless someone makes the mistake of complimenting me on something, yes
 
5:07 PM
that guy doesn't understand how money works
 
GOD DAMN IT! flips over desk, storms out
 
wait, you guys get desks here?!
that's not fair...
> Worker dies in haunted house at Disneyland Paris resort
internal sources are calling it a "transfer"
 
creepy
 
Fruit machines?
 
5:37 PM
yep
 
user41796
6:11 PM
room topic changed to The Whiteboard: General Discussion for programmers.stackexchange.com Pants optional when telecommuting. [coffee-day] [horror-stories] [my-code-is-compiling] [scotch] [the-other-monitor]
 
Happy April Square Day.
 
6:46 PM
8
Q: Is the significance of data structures or algorithms exaggerated in a modern world?

8protonsThroughout college and spending many hours on Quora or Stack Exchange, it's quite common to hear from professors and some experienced professionals alike that data structures or algorithms are key to being a successful developer. Yet, despite my desire to be mindful of them when I code in my fre...

^^^ would appreciate help in deletion of this bikeshedding
 
user41796
It's already got my VTD on it
 
my delete votes regen in 5 hours, so if I'm still awake I'll do it
 
Oh, I guess I can vote delete now. :-P
 
user41796
10k VTD on questions, 20k VTD on answers.
 
user41796
7:01 PM
And you get an extra VTD for every 1k past 10k up to 35k in rep
 
1
A: How do I make a fried egg with completely cooked white but completely runny yolk?

Aaron HallI make myself a breakfast of bacon and eggs every Saturday morning. I feel I have perfected my egg cooking, and I will attempt to tell you how to replicate it. Preparation Materials: One Cast Iron Skillet, 12 inches diameter A wooden spatula with a rounded corner on one side A wide pancake f...

I keep reloading StackOverflow, but no new points... :(
(unrelated to the link above, which I wrote probably 2 years ago...)
I suppose I could write new answers, but I'm trying to finish a bit of code...
 
@GlenH7 what changed?
 
user41796
I dropped the xkcd and mourning references
 
7:19 PM
now I'm mourning for the xkcd and mourning references
 
user41796
mourn away
 
I xkcd what you did there
is there a default licence for Gists?
hum no
 
8:04 PM
Code to this.
ooh I'm in the "Featured On Meta" panel
how exciting, and what could possibly go wrong?
 
You could get tempted to go read the new answers/comments there.
 
yeah :(
 
I've said more than enough on that thread so I'm going to try and resist the urge to read any more of it lest I feel the need to correct more people.
 
same
I'll read new answers as I'm notified about them but that's it
 
at least for a while, obviously we need to see what the "outcome" is at some point
 
8:35 PM
pfft FB group admin tried to share something that had insufficient rights - i.e. comes up as "attachment unavailable" to most of us because we're not in the original rights group
pointed it out
admin screenshots the thing and reposts as image
pretty sure you just completely violated the entire purpose of the original privacy setting
but I'm not going to say anything. had quite enough battles today.
 
@BarryTheHatchet Speaking of privacy, I asked my friend about that email thank you, he says he'll tweet it tonight so I can retweet. :P
 
@AaronHall hah awesome :)
well done
see, Barry knows best
 
♪ "Barry in charge, of our days, and our nights. (Barry in charge) Barry in charge, of our wrongs, and our rights..." ♪
 
I didn't know you could get the Mortarboard badge on a meta site
 
Maybe you can't
 
I got it just now for my MSO post on the comment answers thing
 
@Ixrec you said you didn't know
LIARZ
 
I didn't know until I got it just now
 
my docker images have finished rebuilding
six hours later
I need to get that on a faster storage engine
 
9:09 PM
I was sure the Barry in Charge song would be at the top of the charts. Platinum even. But no love. No stars. :(
is a sensitive soul
though he seems thick skinned
 
♪"Hakuna Matata..."♪♪
 
Questions that ask "where do I start" are typically too broad and are not a good fit for this site. People have their own method for approaching the problem and because of this there cannot be a correct answer. Give a good read over Where to Start, then address your post. — Kyll 31 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
10:46 PM
"Up until now I have done all operations within my main function. Well, apparently my main function is now too large (390,000 lines currently)" I stopped here. — BarryTheHatchet just now
 
Many years ago, I had the misfortune of working on software with that attitude. The original developers ran into that exact error, though at the time the limits were much lower. They had a "fun" solution:
`process();`
`}`

`void process() {`
 
And yes, to make this work, they had to make variables with names like i global
 
all the database accessing functions in the 4GB Fortran god executable at work involve global variables, typically hundreds of them
 
delicious
yay, my Jenkins job invokes my "devenv" script that instantiates a Docker container that builds my project's RPM and ISO outputs
finally
when did I come in here starting to look into this?
Oct 19 '15 at 19:06, by Lightness Races in Orbit
Docker looks like what I was hoping for, too. c.f. VMs
^_^
guess that means I can leave now
 
10:57 PM
rewrite it in rust
 
hmmm maybe later
 
11:38 PM
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it would be a better fit at Programmersjmoerdyk 31 secs ago
 
11:49 PM
@jmoerdyk: I just reposted it over there, but as there's no Capacity Planning tag available it would seem that even there it's considered off-topic. I've also noticed contention in the past between the two groups: "This doesn't fit here at SO, so we'll just dump it over on P." "Hey, quit shuffling your junk off on us!" That sort of thing. — InteXX 2 mins ago
heh, OP schools the commenter
 
but cross-posted it anyway
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (2040 days earlier)      last day (2944 days later) »