I know mods might have been less active in this room nowadays but could any mod take a look at the abnormal interaction I mentioned in a recent pending flag? Now the OP is leaving negative comments under my post that accuse me of not doing something that I have the right to choose not to do (and I've flagged that, too).

@amWhy The catch-22 situation regarding NAA/VLQ flags that regular users appear to be in certainly needs to be addressed. Perhaps a meta post could be helpful to gather more input?

Oh, I see that the question about how long before these flags enter the moderator queue is addressed in this old Mathematics Meta post on flagging:

@TheAmplitwist @amWhy That would be really helpful. Unfortunately I'll be incredibly busy over the next two weeks so perhaps @ArcticChar can post (maybe on behalf)

another upvoted riemann proof trial with a borderline comment as a reply to my comment.

Someone keeps asking the same question over and over again: math.stackexchange.com/q/4197358/588038

@Peter, @ShiveringSoldier, your last comments here would be better placed in CURED? Just a thought.

@amWhy I saw a discussion about sock puppets above, and I feel like this is a similar situation.

FWIW, recently someone named Jenny asked a question from the same textbook:math.stackexchange.com/q/4188210/588038

@ShiveringSoldier That's fine then. It would be more helpful to include the reason your link and message is useful, in terms of suspecting .sockpuppets. I'm with you, this person who keeps creating such posts NEEDS MODERATION INTERVENTION.

@amWhy Thank you. I will keep that in mind for the next time.

Tomorrow it well be a full week of no-shows from Mods in their very own Math Mods' Office.

SYN