@quid If you keep censoring helpful comments I will raise a meta question about this.

@BillDubuque you keep ignoring instructions given in the question. This has nothing to do with censorship. I will not tolerate in that thread what you propose in the comments in that thread. I devised that thread as a tool and will use it as I intended it. You are free to discuss the merits of this in a separate thread yet you will not be allowed damage the tool as intended.

The idea you propose is arguably not bad in itself but it would lead to discussion that's for sure.

And the point is to have no discussion there.

@BillDubuque

it's fine, another thread it's not a big deal

@quid seriously?? You are censoring the useful information I added to help people quickly see the questions with such keywords in those titles. Unbelievable Ok, now is the perfect time to discuss censorship on meta. This is the worst I have ever seen on this site.

@quid As a courtesy I will give you a few moments to reverse these unconscionable censorship actions. Otherwise I am going open a thread mentioning all of the recent censorship concerning those whose views differ from a couple mods; I can't believe my eyes.

@BillDubuque I enforce the rules I outlined;

@quid This is close as closest to dictatorship that the site have ever become. How very sad... If this is the way you are going to behave I will never speak to you again.

@BillDubuque yes your conduct is sad indeed. I created a thread and explain the rules in this thread. You think you can simply ignore them. That's rude. Even if I were not a moderator.

@quid Where do your "rules" say that one cannot add this info? And why do you think you get to make rules that others cannot add helpful information?

@BillDubuque I told you in chat here.

@BillDubuque This is how I see it. Mods started this thread, they established their rules.. fine. Lets respect it. Even if one of them don't deserve our respect

You are way out of line.

@quid Unbelievable. This is very far from "democracy". Very sad to see you go down this course.

@BillDubuque your conduct is rude.

Just that you think your idea is great does not give you the right to push it through against the wishes of the user that started it.

This is what you do since years, and that's the root of many problems on this site.

@quid Yes, I see, adding useful information is "rude". I have nothing more to say.

@BillDubuque don't twist my words.

@BillDubuque what the... I've just seen you profile

@Magic_Isa I agree, whole heartedly.

@amWhy i'll appreciate if you don't ping me, thank you

Not a problem, @Magic_Isa (I had to ping you one last time to make sure your get my response to your ping to me.)

BTW is status-review used correctly on Autofilters for Hot Network Questions? I thought that this tag is added to automatically escalate an issue to the CMs. So that probably should come only after the discussion on the local meta. (Even the post says that escalation comes after the discussion phase, which is to be held until April 30.)

Meta Stack Exchange: Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response process (March-April 2020)

@Magic_Isa You can ignore me in chat, in which case you won't get pings from me. Else, I will reply to comments you make when and where I find it appropriate to do so.

@amWhy you know what, you can do anything that you want, ping me here and there.. say anything you want, here and there... I don't care.

@Magic_Isa :) Glad you agree! $\ddot\smile$ :) :)