It seems that ToolPurger's answer was unaccepted before the question was deleted.

@MartinSleziak can moderator see , who voted whom ?

@skullpatrol , whats going on ? is there a issue with a mod /

there is now

I don't like to be repeatedly threatened with a ban hammer

:)

@MartinSleziak why do you think think so? (I ask as on deleted posts IIRC no accept checkmark is typically present; so just that there is no acc ans does not mean it was onaccepted before. )

@skullpatrol I've just sent some words to Richard saying that the manner in which he entered the math chat room was not particularly moderate, and didn't do much to calm the situation down. I'll try to keep an eye on things.

@ArthurFischer thank you :)

@Jim Not quite. Moderators do have access to some broad voting statistics, but not at the post level. We cannot tell whether userA up-/downvoted a specific post by userB, but we can see whether userA has up-/downvoted at least a certain number of userB's posts (where that certain number is strictly greater than 1).

@skillpatrol We'll see what comes of it. The math chat room has been a bit insane for a couple days now.

@ArthurFischer having this room immediately available to deal with the "overflow" has been helpful.

@skullpatrol It is not a ban hammer.

You named it that, apparently.

@quid a) They mentioned 15 rep loss. b) Google cache shown accepted answer when I looked at the time.

In fact it still is: webcache.googleusercontent.com/…

@MartinSleziak yes, but the Q&A got deleted by votes. So they'd loose the points also if there was no unaccept.

@quid You're right about that. The part b still stands, though.

@ArthurFischer so if I upvote someone twice say (just by chance, because they've posted 2 good answers) you can see that?

@AlecTeal this is not what Arthur said, he said there is a number which is greater than 1, so it could also be 6321. Anyway the details of this are not public.

@quid so the details as in number of votes are not public?

@AlecTeal it is not public what exactly moderators can see.

@quid I have heard that obscurity is the best form of security you know

How is this not a "ban hammer?" @PedroTamaroff

@skullpatrol a ban hammer has a wooden stick and decorations in black leather.

Ok, thanks for the clarification @quid Now I feel so much better :P

Echo?

@skullpatrol I guess they might get out the ban hammer for real if we start to play "echo" here. :-)

:-)

@skullpatrol have you got that picture I linked?

Nope.

I'm putting him on ignore.

Case closed.

@skullpatrol Again, you're giving it that name. As I see it, the moderator was just being slightly funny about his arrival to the room.

I don't know why you're making a fuss about this, since you're usually facetious yourself.

Three times?

What are you asking?

Nothing.

OK.

Good luck on your final pal :-)

Yeah, date hasn't been confirmed yet.