It is not a good idea to titleize names and validate names against simple regexp. Nice read: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names — spickermann 35 secs ago

Welcome to SO. I'm having trouble seeing how you are answering the given question. More fundamentally, you've chosen a bad question for your first answer. Our ultimate motive is to create the canonical Q&A for programmers. In this case, Fabrício Matté wanted to create a canonical question to encompass all javascript asynchronous questions. This is why the other answers (including when Fabrício Matté answered his own question) are extremely thorough and trying to explain the concept. To summarize, I think you're getting downvoted because your answer is too brief and only code. — Teepeemm 56 secs ago

you could also try programmers.stackexchange.com — Transcendence 53 secs ago

...there are many cases where programmers would be e.g. happy with having overflow yield a partially-indeterminate value or recognizable trap, but cannot accept Undefined Behavior. Forcing programmers to write code to prevent overflow will make code programs run more slowly than they could have been if overflows had been allowed to yield a partially-Indeterminate value. Likewise there are many systems where a slightly relaxed version of the aliasing rule could have been adopted, which would say that aliasing effectively creates additional variables, and any particular write or read may... — supercat 30 secs ago

"I'm learning to construct a JApplet" Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. — Andrew Thompson 29 secs ago

every student should read that : meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6166/… — Amxx 1 min ago

There are still programmers who need and use such features. Nordic countries haven't yet sunk into the sea, for example. — Peter 32 secs ago

I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems more appropriate for codereview.stackexchange.com or programmers.stackexchange.com — Peter Duniho 40 secs ago

std::string, is technically an extension. I can create a data type of string and pass that in just fine. What I'm trying to do is get other programmers to be able to pass in a string literal. The data type of a string literal is char[]. — C_Rod 55 secs ago

Thanks again @AliSoftware... But I don't know why down vote, anyway this will help to other programmers.. :) — Anand Gautam 1 min ago

...This is really an "opinion-based" question. What will most programmers think if they know I'm using GUI builder? SO is for objective questions. — Cinch 1 min ago

@ddriver So, the asker is expected to know whether there is a standard term for this particular paradigm in order to know which site to ask the question on? If there is a standard term, then the question is a fit for SO and if not, the question is a fit for Programmers? This is a bit of a catch-22, don't you think? This question is not asking for a discussion on what to call this paradigm--it's asking if there is a name for it, and if so, what is that name? To me, this seems a perfect fit for SO. If you don't agree, you could leave a better explanation as to why it's not a fit for SO? — nhgrif 32 secs ago

@GingerHead I'd rather not retract my comment.. If he's interested, he'll look into it and allow himself to decide whether or not it's too difficult. I know programmers who were aware of lambdas before they were aware of anonymous classes. It's beneficial in many ways, and should be mentioned to anyone still using anonymous classes for functional interfaces. — Vince Emigh 41 secs ago

Just wondering whether this question might be better asked in either cs.stackexchange.com or programmers.stackexchange.com — cup 1 min ago

@cup Thanks for the suggestion. I think cs.stackexachange might not be proper. But probably programmers.stackexchange should. — Hongxu Chen 1 min ago

@cup Can I keep both or migrate to programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c%2b%2b ? — Hongxu Chen 25 secs ago

@cup - This would be off-topic for both Programmers. Asking for examples like this generally falls into the category of being a poll and therefore off-topic. — GlenH7 55 secs ago

Plase read this (It will help you understand why you are being downvoted) : meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6166/… — Amxx 1 min ago

@cup ^^^ see above. Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflow — gnat 1 min ago

Thanks Ken. You've been not only very helpful but quite affable. A rarity on SO. More senior programmers and admins should take a page from your book when answering questions from new programmers. — Edward II 23 secs ago

Glad you got it working, but I'm closing it as a dupe. This pitfall has been collecting unsuspecting programmers since it was introduced - I remember a long time ago I had to find my climbing gear as well ... :) — Maarten Bodewes 1 min ago

@jdphenix I thought the question answers it. Partly because of curiosity and partly because of limiting nasty programmers to prevent them from doing something bad. — IllidanS4 23 secs ago