« first day (90 days earlier)      last day (3599 days later) » 

00:11
Certainty level 1.45
This is definitely off-topic as defined by the help center. However, it would probably find a good home on programmers.stackexchange.com. — Jon 50 secs ago
00:29
2015-04-20T00:29:00.113Z Quota has been reset. Was 8560 is now 9999
 
3 hours later…
03:00
Certainty level 0.45000002
Thanks for the '-' votes. I thought this question was quite descriptive and other programmers shouldn't have any problem understanding my question. Someone who understands the 'Update Command' would probably have no problem of how and where to assign a session variable... — ME2 36 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
Better safe than sorry (yes, I know the original version). For most modern systems, this is no issue at all and some extra checking has none to negligble performance impact for far by most code. Safe code is much more important for this. Highly optimized code is already encapsulated in few modules and there optimizations are certainly justified. However, this should be applied intentionally; the default should be to play safe first, Especially to get this into the mindes of novice programmers! There is enough unsafe software in the world. — Olaf 57 secs ago
03:29
Certainty level 0.4
Creating a Java package from Matlab code (if you're using Matlab Builder JA or similar) just wraps your M code up in a JAR and runs it inside an embedded Matlab runtime, so it'll perform basically the same as the same code in regular Matlab. This is too broad a question to answer directly. The performance in each language will depend on the specifics of how it's implemented and the choices of the programmers implementing it. — Andrew Janke 1 min ago
04:11
Certainty level 0.65000004
Google "technical phone interview questions", and a bunch should come up. It really depends. Some of the normal interview questions apply- "tell me about a time when...", "...you worked as part of a team", "...you had trouble with a teammate", "you had multiple deadlines and could only meet one". That kind of thing. They'll also probably ask about what projects you've worked on / some code you're proud of. This question doesn't really seem like an SO thing, by the way. More of a programmers.se question. And it's probably been asked before a bunch of times. — Parthian Shot 51 secs ago
04:49
Certainty level 0.68
@ Trey: And it says, right there in the tag: "Questions about licensing should be asked on Programmers.SE. If you’re using this tag here, your question is probably not appropriate for Stack Overflow." Your best bet for an answer to this question is to ask your lawyer. Taking legal advice from non-lawyers is asking for trouble, and even if someone is a lawyer, unless they're your lawyer (e.g., a professional-client relationshpi exists), you have no recourse if they're wrong. — T.J. Crowder 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
Your question about the definiton of a microframework can be found in the below link hope it will help you. stackoverflow definition of microframeworkHarigovind R 1 min ago
05:09
Certainty level 0.4
@tee: If you can do some Java then you should find the official Python tutorial fairly easy to follow, since it's really aimed at experienced programmers rather than raw beginners. But be aware that Python does some things quite differently to Java. — PM 2Ring 43 secs ago
06:07
Certainty level 0.71999997
@Jon this question is a very poor fit for Programmers - it would be quickly voted down and closed over there, see meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6483/… Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 54 secs ago
 
1 hour later…
08:22
Certainty level 0.43
But it at least is related to it isn't it? And it also is a vital question for programmers right?! — Backfighter 25 secs ago
 
3 hours later…
10:55
Certainty level 0.4
I'm not sure this is really a question for SO. Sure, it's about installing and configuring Python and/or vi, which only programmers (or maybe sysadmins) are likely to care about, but I think you might find better answers on SuperUser. — abarnert 39 secs ago
 
3 hours later…
13:51
Certainty level 0.4
Java or JavaScript? If Java, programmers exchange might help more — William Isted 1 min ago
 
1 hour later…
15:11
Certainty level 0.45000002
Stack Overflow isn't really for "advice" per se. It is for dealing with issues encountered when implementing features and applications. While the programmers exchange does deal with a more broader scope, this question will still be off topic there. Please look around for this information using google or piece wise looking at various implementations or tutorials online, because any answers here would end up being largely opinion based or link based which is not desirable. — Travis J 1 min ago
15:33
Certainty level 0.4
Since there are not many programmers on the topic collision-detection, may i just ask if you got something like skype or facebook where i can reach you more like in a chat? I write code in javascript so psuedo still makes me a bit confused. What does the enqueue function for instance mean? — Murplyx 25 secs ago
16:06
Certainty level 0.4
Would it be better to post this on [Programmers](programmers.stackexchange.com)? — lloydm 57 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
I did add a question on programmers, but didn't see a lot of attention there. Is it appropriate to add a duplicate on SO? programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/279299/…Joshua Goldberg 56 secs ago
16:30
Certainty level 0.4
The section on co-routines of David Beazley's PyCon UK 2008 presentation titled Generator Tricks for Systems Programmers might interest to you. — martineau 45 secs ago
17:06
Certainty level 0.43
Note that your question is not phrased in a way that means what you intend, if your audience is Python programmers. In Python, you can do a, b, c = f(x), f(y), f(z) and evaluation of f(x) happens before evaluation of f(z). (This is relevant if the function has side-effects.) So evaluation of the right-hand side is left-to-right. But the RHS is always evaluated before binding anything to the LHS. — John Y 22 secs ago
Certainty level 1.4
I think you should enjoy programmers.stackexchange.com for this type of questions (you've got many questions, I see). stackoverflow.com stands for more like for coding problems not conceptual questions/problems. — Andritchi Alexei 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.43
Picking which software to use is not on topic at programmers.stackexchange.com... — enderland 21 secs ago
18:07
Certainty level 0.45000002
still sound like wront technical design. Maybe data structure that was selected for data description is wrong. As programmers we can define something more complex than arrays. — Krzysztof Safjanowski 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
@sfk And in fact, enable compiler warnings, make it as annoying as possible, this rule applies to beginners as well as to experienced c programmers. — iharob 25 secs ago
Certainty level 0.63
@AndritchiAlexei see above ^^^. Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 1 min ago
 
2 hours later…
20:34
Certainty level 0.43
Might be better question for programmers.stackexchange — NESPowerGlove 53 secs ago
Certainty level 1.6
This is almost a good question for Programmers.SE but is too broad. With some editing to hone its focus it would be a good candidate for migration. — Snowman 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.4
@curiousguy: The C language specifications are insufficient to allow practical non-trivial programs to be written that do not rely upon things which the standards did not specify. Further, many C compilers have historically documented their behavior in situations that were left "undefined" by the C standard. IMHO, there should be an effort to allow programmers to specify their platform-related assumptions, so as to allow compilers to either behave appropriately if they can, or refuse compilation if they cannot. — supercat 21 secs ago
Certainty level 0.43
21:29
Certainty level 0.63
Likely, this is overly broad question for SO. Try to ask it on programmers.SE. For general discussion of solutions to fault tolerance, see, e.g., Principles of transaction processing by Bernstein and Newcomer. Good articles: book.mixu.net/distsys and engineering.linkedin.com/distributed-systems/…Victor Sorokin 32 secs ago
21:56
Certainty level 0.4
The memcpy knows nothing about C++ objects and doesn't care. It is a bull in a china shop -- you can't stop it from doing what it does. There comes a time when you have to trust that your programmers know what they're doing. — PaulMcKenzie 49 secs ago
Certainty level 0.4
22:36
Certainty level 0.68
@VictorSorokin if it is too broad for SO, it is too broad for Programmers.SE. Furthermore, item 4 in the list is a resource request which is off-topic on both sites. — Snowman 1 min ago
Certainty level 0.41
1) Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. 2) See Detection/fix for the hanging close bracket of a code block for a problem I could no longer be bothered fixing. 3) Are you sure the IDE is set up for J2SE development as opposed to (for instance) Android? — Andrew Thompson 53 secs ago
Certainty level 0.78000003
This question is probably better suited for programmers.stackexchange.com — Rick Smith 35 secs ago
22:58
Certainty level 0.4
@KeithThompson: I wish someone would standardize a C-like language that better let programs specify what they actually want from their integer types. On many processors, int32_t is much more efficient than int16_t for variables held in registers, but int16_t is more efficient for variables held in RAM. There should be some way of saying "Give me the cheapest thing that's at least 16 bits, but I won't mind if it's actually 32". I find it curious that compiler developers do weird and wacky things with Undefined Behavior, but can't let programmers specify what their code requires. — supercat 1 min ago
23:57
Certainty level 1.4
This sounds like it might be a better question for programmers.stackexchange.com ; although you should be sure to read their help to make sure before posting.. — Blorgbeard 1 min ago

« first day (90 days earlier)      last day (3599 days later) »