« first day (45 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) » 

12:03 AM
Certainty level 0.4
Certainty level 0.43
Asking a 3rd party api or any off-site reference is still oft-topic here. However, this is not really a question for programmers but rather for a security specialist. Have you considered contacting those banks and ask why they consider your website a potential security risk? — walther 1 min ago
 
12:45 AM
Certainty level 0.65
Incidentally, I might be missing the obvious, but I honestly don't see how this question is off-topic. This site's help center FAQ indicates that the following topics are germane to this site: "a specific programming problem, or a software algorithm, or software tools commonly used by programmers" (e.g. third-party APIs which have been discussed extensively on this site). As I clarified in my comment above, I am looking for a coding solution or referral to an API that could help with detection of fraudulent credit cards. If no such solutions are available, then I can accept that. Thanks again! — cjo30080 1 min ago
 
 
7 hours later…
7:53 AM
Certainty level 0.4
dear camickr thank you so much for your feedback, i want you to know that i really appreciate you taking the time to review my program. I am new to programming and its probably very aggravating for real programmers to see the same mistakes over and over and for that i am sorry. I will study very hard so that someday i am able to give back to the community. Again thank you so very much — Abraham Esparza 13 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
9:15 AM
Certainty level 0.4
We're programmers here - not lawyers. I suggest you read the Ts & Cs of use of the YouTube API. — Squonk 2 mins ago
 
9:37 AM
Certainty level 0.4
You have a legal question, so you figured you'd ask programmers ? Interesting thought process... Do you go the the barber's when you need bread ? — 2Dee 20 secs ago
 
9:51 AM
Certainty level 0.4
I'm asking YouTube programmers and sure you are not one of them. — imorad87 48 secs ago
 
10:19 AM
Certainty level 0.4
It appears to be called the "avalance effect". programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/273809/…Millie Smith 1 min ago
 
10:33 AM
Certainty level 0.4
 
10:58 AM
awwadawwdw
 
 
3 hours later…
1:39 PM
Certainty level 0.45000002
My thought is that this question would be better received at programmers.stackexchange.com where such conceptual matters are regularly discussed. Here, among the horny-handed sons and daughters of toil, we just type in a string of ill-thought, ill-spelled, words and move on to the next function point — High Performance Mark 22 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
2:49 PM
Certainty level 0.4
You are welcome Abdullah. — Sabri 22 secs ago
 
3:33 PM
Certainty level 0.4
 
4:09 PM
2015-03-06T16:10:00.628Z Warning: Retrieved 100 comments. Might have missed some. This is unlikely to happen
Certainty level 0.4
@Delphius Two things: 1) Your externally linked question appears to be a reasonable length for the format here, your fears of it being too long are unfounded - in any case if we're going to read it anyways we might as well read it here instead of there, and 2) SO is more for help with specific coding issues; your question is a fine one but you may have better luck on one of the other sites as your question is about interpreting an algorithm in a published paper (I'm just not sure which at the moment; there is math, cstheory, cs, and even programmers). — Jason C 56 secs ago
Certainty level 0.42000002
@Delphius Two things: 1) External link: if we're going to read it anyways we might as well read it here instead - however you may want to try to shorten your question; most importantly because doing so may help you understand the problem more, and 2) SO is more for help with specific coding issues; your question is a fine one but you may have better luck on one of the other sites as your question is about interpreting an algorithm in a published paper (I'm just not sure which at the moment; there is math, cstheory, cs, and even programmers). — Jason C 1 min ago
 
4:33 PM
Certainty level 0.4
 
4:55 PM
Certainty level 0.4
Thanks for helping me put a name to what I'm trying to do. For a while I was considering using Prolog to implement this: programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/266205/…. But, there is too much risk of "unintended consequences". Do you know of any PHP implementations of ABAC/XACML? — alexw 52 secs ago
 
5:19 PM
Certainty level 0.45000002
This is a good answer, but it would be better if you'd used the word "delegate". The object that you give to the Thread(Runnable r) constructor becomes the Thread object's delegate. The difference between inheritance and delegation is the difference between saying, "A foo is a bar" and saying "a foo has a bar." The latter form is a much more powerful tool, and programmers should get into the habit of using it. Probably the only reason why Thread has a public run() method is that delegation had not yet been named as a design pattern when Java first rolled out. — james large 2 mins ago
 
5:47 PM
Certainty level 0.4
I'll second Michael. programmers.stackexchange.com is more suited to discuss concepts — Tom Toms 30 secs ago
Certainty level 0.42000002
@EugeneSh. good point, I don't know why new programmers very often use global variables instead of passing parameters to functions. — iharob 1 min ago
 
 
1 hour later…
7:11 PM
2015-03-06T19:12:00.416Z Quota has been reset. Was 9252 is now 9999
 
 
2 hours later…
9:17 PM
Certainty level 0.43
"converted to a pointer" - false, and likely to be confusing to programmers coming from languages like C#. An array in C/C++ is two things. It is a block of memory containing N instances of a given type, and a pointer to that memory. The ABI provides no mechanism to forward such data so you can only achieve it by perfectly matching the argument you wish to pass - either an explicit, hard coded fingerprint or in C++ a template to make one for you. int f(char (&arg)[64]) or template<class T, size_t N> int f(T (&arg)[N]). — kfsone 53 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
10:23 PM
Certainty level 0.4
Real programmers use butterflies, I'd go with that. /joke — BradleyDotNET 55 secs ago
 
11:01 PM
Certainty level 0.4
Don't sweat it. I tend to apply the basic sniff test (programming or development). Others apply the "tools used by a programmers (which is effectively everything). The community likes to provide a home for all questions. I've even suggested that Super User and Stack Overflow merge :) — jww 51 secs ago
 

« first day (45 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) »