well think about it if another answer doesn't come up. i'm so not looking forward to giving that to the existing answer, and i always award the bounty so it doesn't just get wasted...it would hurt to give it to that answer though. just saying. keep an eye on it
that is then quite certainly an image (as a result)
@George: though right flash are not plain images. Often some people use flash to kind of not have directly downloadable graphic data in a website
And on that website posted the "image" seems for instace to be a kind of "transparent" animation png kind of stylish thing (which is displayed withing the flash object)
@karthick87 its possible to have a look in the browser cache.
Sometimes there is some caching done and some data of flash might(if no means are taken to avoid this) accessible
yes, that is quite true. Still it would serve the purpose to safe the data (in some respect)... for later extration for instance. I also assume its possible to use it on your own website (tough maybe not copyright legallly)
@GeorgeEdison it's all true what you say. But it's not me to say "what intentions lay behind the request". I would strive hard to avoid flash as best as possible. I don't like it
are there still cases when / where it is not the better alternative? I am so little imaginative
Does some circumstances occur to you where it would be the better choice? flash that is
askubuntu.com/questions/230992/… is a question I recetly tried to give an answer. I like my answer though I figured it is quite a lengthy thing to actually monitor/survey some programs behavior. I though somebody else would also answer with some alternative approach. Still up to know ,very little response :(
Indeed I would have though that video would be one of the simplest things to bput into a browser. In many ways a video is not so much different to a <img src="remotefile"> . Sure there need to be the right codecs etc. But many img formats are also "moving pictures" (gifs/pngs). Also I though Youtube offers some HTML5 only way of watching their content , already some time now. So is it right you actually mean the purpose is to cover the variatey of devices?
I used ogv container videos (I though forgot the acutall video codec I used, I have to admint;) but putting this video in a website and later seeing the video worked on UBUNTU systems "out of the box".
in some ways this live streaming would be quite similar (codesc, compression etc) but in others it would really seem to be different (caching, skipping etc)
also, there is a bug in chromium that i despise (or an oddity in my setup) where when a download completes, sometimes it tries to restart the download in a new tab - repeatedly - until all memory is consumed or i killall chromium-browser. it's quite irritating
@AbrahamVanHelpsing yeah, I saw that. I tried some experimentation today, but I don't have a tripod, so they where kinda ghosty... I don't really know what I'm doing ;)
right. That's what I meant. I don't have a tripod so the output was blurry because one of the pictures wasn't in line. I need to read its doc on auto aligning.
dear people that complained when google/youtube services were at the top of the search results... if i google: "movie name trailer" i should NOT get "news for xyz trailer" and imdb. i should get links to the trailer. thanks :)
yeah, it's when it tries to make a QNitroSharePrivate out of QObject. It thinks it's confused about QObject, but it's really confused about QNitroSharePrivate
i don't know if it's relevant, but: Missing Q_OBJECT macros and metatype cleanup http://www.kdab.com/porting-from-qt-4-to-qt-5/ Seems like it could be without looking at the code at all